Geek99

You adjust your nob while playing ? That’s not very cool

Isn’t he taking his hands of the strings, whilst his other hand remains on the neck ?

They don’t know the difference even the jazz ones are too small

Jazz set ....

In my experience it takes time as people have the annoying habit of being polite and tolerant of “foreign people” learning their language and totally omit to point out grammatical errors. Muppets....

For which bass ? Maybe someone has one spare...

It’s not that bad honestly

I never could get on with P basses when younger, now they work for me. You’re not alone

Then she is a bigamist and should be jailed immediately. Unless she is an MP and solicitor in which case she can be married to you still from within a cell and continue her duties from there until released after a sentence of a week or so

That’s a very good drawing of a sofa, and more so with crayons

I honestly don’t think either player knew for certain about any given track. Motown often has each player record a version then they used the best one. Story from babbitt was of him and Jameson arguing in a bar about who had played on a tune they could hear on the juke box. Even they couldn’t tell when it was somewhat freshly done

I read that also, in guitarist mag many years ago

Ooh - pass me popcorn RIGHT now

Wood expands and contracts - paint cracks off. I did my research looking at a lot of old fenders and looked at the way the grain sat in mine

That’s not what Steve Vai says

To clarify, “some good awful lot rubbish” cant that be said of any genre ?

Could that not be said of any genre ?

Three years to a higher court is actually pretty good going

see my mod, you don't need to get the hang of anything except putting the pin in the right way

but the OP describes the problems he had from doing this. If you try my modification, those are alleviated

no, the House Of Lords judgement allowed only future royalty claims. Their decision on the delay in bringing a claim was found on the fact that no harm had been caused to the defendant because the complainant had take so long to act and that in the contrary, the defendant has been benefited in that time by a full share of the royalties. The loss due to delay fell only on the claimant

yes, as long as you can prove co -authorship you can take as long as you like to claim, but don't ask for back royalties, only future shares are allowed. I do not honestly think that is fair, but their Lordships were unanimous in the House Of Lords judgement. It might be fairer to allow back royalties at some reduced rate to allow for declining future royalties

The original sole beneficiary (A) has had all the benefit already that rightly belonged to someone else (the now-joint beneficary (ies) B) , should A be be allowed to keep it, or its proceeds ? That does not sound like justice. The complainant B has gone out on a financial limb to get what he believes to be a rightful share, and had convinced a court who have agreed that B has been short changed. If A is allowed to keep 10m£ when he only rightly deserved to get £5m that is unfair. B should be put into the place where they would have been . If A has to sell a yacht to achieve that so be it.

i honestly never thought he was an admirable at all.