[quote name='Meddle' timestamp='1499539109' post='3332108']
I find it ironic that that is the [i]standard[/i] model. Gibson intended the Custom to be the top of the heap, but the Standards are considered the ultimate Les Paul to own, and to many it is the ultimate guitar.
A production line guitar that took archtop construction methods, reproduced them in solid mahogany, and kitted out with weak microphonic humbuckers? A furiously heavy guitar with poor ergonomics, that feels like a headstone with a guitar neck attached. Limited upper fret access. Because it is vintage it will have worn out frets, with an army of angry nerds wanting to hunt you down if you consider replacing them. Crackly pots, worn out switch, intermittent output jack, worn finish, tarnished metal hardware, slippy tuners with crumbling buttons, worn out nut.
I'm always wryly amused that people actually modified and upgraded the 'bursts' back in the day. a Northern European retailer fitted Hagstrom vibratos to a number of them (drilling out that precious maple top) to make them more marketable.
And then there is the 'Bad Coconuts' Les Paul:
If you ever feel bad about slipping with the screw driver or dropping solder on your bass or guitar, take solace in the fact that somebody took a 1959 Les Paul and gave it a second cutaway. ignore the 'Collectors Choice' stuff, it is just a joke. Now that Photobucket have changed their policy it is hard to find photos of 'Bad Coconuts' that I can link to.
[/quote]I'll never un-see that