Doctor J

Is the wagging finger a sign from the T1000 to walk away?

That looks incredible. Top work.

There has never been more variety or options for a bassist, so it's a great time to have this choice to make but it can also be bewildering. That's a lot of money to spend on something you don't know whether you want or not. If it were me, I'd start with the basics: What size neck do you like? Chunky or slim? Precision sized nut or Jazz sized nut? If it's not right for your hand, you're never going to love it no matter what it sounds like. What kind of pickups do you like? P, P&J, J&J, J&MM, P&MM, MM, single coil soapbars or humbucking soapbars? Probably the most important consideration after neck size, in my opinion. You can change individual pickups but changing the type of pickup can require surgery. Is weight an issue? If you're uncomfortable with a heavy bass, you need to rule out heavy basses straight away. How many strings? Active or passive? Again, a massively important consideration. Like pickups, this can be changed afterwards but you're better off getting it right first time. Ergonomics - an extension of the neck consideration, I suppose, but do you need a forearm contour, for example? It's fine lashing out brand names at you but you need to figure out what type of bass you actually want first and then start looking at the options within that kind of specification across the range of brands. Only you know what kind of neck you like. If you post examples of the kind of tone you like, it would be easier to make recommendations on how to get that kind of sound.

or Æon Spoke

O is for Obituary

And the JV Squiers, Grecos, Japanese Ibanez and much, much more

E is for EMF

Add one of the last few years to your search string and you'll probably find more. Just his name will return results from long before his affiliation with Sire

Fantastic work, can't wait to see how you fit it out inside.

BB1100s from 85

Exactly what I was thinking and maybe a bit closer to the bridge.

@NancyJohnson How are you getting on with this now that you've had some time to live with it?

That looks very nice, congratulations. Red is a bugger to photograph, is it the same in real life as the pics? I've never considered new strings an upgrade, though, changing the strings is the first thing I do on a new instrument 😂

There's a very, very large space between hate and fawning over them and it's possible for people to be in that space. It's not a binary thing, you're not necessarily one or the other. This thread is a discussion about the mythology surrounding vintage instruments, no?

Where's the hate? They were and remain absolute genius designs which have stood the test of time. They were mass produced items, though, and suggesting there could be something better, due to an accumulated knowledge and skill buildup over the last 70 years of electric instrument manufacture, is not hate.

I don't recall shouting anything. I'm just engaging in the discussion, no need to be so aggressive. A Richard move? Seriously? Chill out, fella. I don't know these data points don't exist, that's why I'm asking. I'm interested to see if there actually is anything behind it. I recall an interview with Eric Johnson where he said he believed the steel used in the 50's was a better quality than the steel available after that. That's very interesting. I'd prefer to see something which actually backs it up though, that's all. It's something which can be verified, surely? If so, has somebody actually done the verification? That's what I'm asking. It's very easy to check on the unequal appreciation I mentioned, just compare the original list prices to the going rates now. The information is out there. Very clearly. If I'm sceptical, it's because I'm conscious there's a very lucrative industry built about creating and sustaining the myths around vintage instruments. There is so much hot air around this topic, I would love to get to the bottom of what is actually real and what is mojo 😉. I'm not interested in myths or guesses, I want something tangible. It should be possible for real information to be out there. I think it's a very interesting subject and I'd love to fully understand it. If that upsets you, well, I'm genuinely surprised.

Nice! Is there a block down the middle or is it fully hollow?

I don't think I missed the point at all. When you're using terms like "I imagine the trees used..." and "there was likely..." it just feeds into the vintage mythology without any basis in fact. That is the point. Unless there's some evidence that was the case, before we get into analysing whether that makes for a better instrument body or neck and, even then, how much of a factor that makes to the sound heard by a magnetic pickup of an electric solidbody instrument, we're all just random dudes guessing. It would be so nice to read some facts, for a change, instead of the endless conjecture.

Some documentation on historical and contemporary wood sourcing would make for interesting reading, were it available. Let's be honest, when people talk about vintage basses, most of the time they're talking about Fenders. Fender were, of course, a user of cheap and plentiful rather than any carefully selected wood and not above gluing random offcuts together to get the most out of their wood budget. It would be interesting to see how the wood they used in the 50's and 60's (let's not go into their financially driven decision to use Northern Ash in the 70's just yet) compares to the stuff they use today in the likes of Custom Shop and Masterbuilt instruments where there actually is a bit of consideration given to the quality of the wood used - that is, of course, giving a massive benefit of the doubt to the pre-70's instruments as having any better quality wood than what they use now in standard production instruments. Is there any data for how long there is between felling and instrument manufacture even for modern day Fender. Without any kind of source material it's just conjecture on both sides, though. Outside of Fender, of course, in the boutique realm, there are quite a few builders who source and use very old wood stock if requested. There's still a lot of old wood out there, it's just not really in the supply chain of the mass producers. The point I made before, either in this thread or the recent wood one, I can't be arsed looking, was that if the effects of ageing apply to Fender then it must also apply to all the other old basses out there and logic would lead me to think that an instrument that started out as really good should still be better than one of the same age which was not as good - but the market does not reflect that. The vintage bass market is heavily weighted towards Fender (and now even Squier), substantially more-so than Gibson or Rickenbacker. It's wonderful that all the effects of aging - the wood crystals, the weaker magnets, the missing finishes letting the wood breathe, whatever, they all seem to be a positive thing. That's great, but it must surely apply to all old instruments, even the unloved Kays, Tiescos and relics from behind the Iron Curtain? The likes of the very highly rated early 80's Japanese stuff (Squier aside) has not appreciated to the same degree as the big F (or S). You don't hear this kind of talk around old Aria SBs or Yamaha BBs to the same degree at all but the ageing factor must apply equally to all, no? I picked up a now 36 year old BB1100s for €300 a few years ago. Nice bass, yes, but I bet it started out as a nice bass too. Pickups are an interesting one. The old hand-wound method of manufacture by largely unskilled labour was charmingly inconsistent and scatter-wound is indeed a way of recreating that type of pickup. Given the inconsistency, though, they're never all going to sound the same, either then or now. There can't really be, by definition, a scatter-wound sound. Also, you'd have to imagine that, with some experience under their belts, that labour force would start getting more consistent as they skilled up, no? Instruments are a funny thing, what people read into them. I once had a guy complain I had undone the factory seal which could never be as good - after I had taken the neck off an instrument. His argument was that the neck could never be put back on as well as the first time. Amazing conversation. Could you imagine buying an old Fender these days and not having a look at the neck pocket? 😂 As was said, whatever floats your boat, it's all good once the player enjoys what they have in their hands.

Got any source material for that? How old was a tree in a 63 Jazz before it was cut down?

The long face is Ric Ocasek from The Cars, I think.

It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets three chords again.