Oh , for the record. And me..
A [i][b]Non sequitur[/b][/i] ([url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin"]Latin[/url] for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument with a conclusion that does not follow from its premises.[sup][url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_%28logic%29#cite_note-1"][1][/url][/sup] In a [i]non sequitur[/i], the conclusion could be either true or false (because there is a disconnection between the premise and the conclusion), but the argument nonetheless asserts the conclusion to be true, and is thus fallacious. All [url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy"]invalid arguments[/url] are special cases of [i]non sequitur[/i]. The term has special applicability in law, having a formal legal definition. Many types of known [i]non sequitur[/i] argument forms have been classified into many types of [url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_%28disambiguation%29"]logical fallacies[/url].