SpondonBassed

You'll only know then. The initial report sounds promising

Yup. It looks fine with the strings on. How's it sounding?

Well done. It is odd to see an ibby headstock on a warwick shaped body. Well worth the effort just to see that.

Be thankful that it is the only place it lodged.

Not quite the same as a neon pink G string so, pass. Sorry. It's completely the wrong gauge for my cleft.

Welcome Membo

Clean and simple. It's a beaut.

Welcome Nrthnr.

Welcome Yaumegui.

Welcome back Dave

Welcome Sara.

I set the intonation for the new strings yesterday. Two strings needed minor adjustment. My fat fingers aren't sensitive enough to sound tuneful with guitar strings, especially finer strings like these but I was still getting a sweeter sound with chords above the twelfth. I didn't touch the nut. @OldG's advice sounds fine. I just don't want to cut the nut until the lad has tried these strings. He might want to go back to the 10s. In either case, I will keep that in mind for further down the line. His granddad has bought him a stand. He had a wall hanger at the old house but I think that was partly why he dropped the instrument in the first place. It was too much of a stretch for him when he was little. If nothing else comes of this refurb, it's got his granddad talking about having a another go on his 3/4 classical guitar so I am glad I made the effort.

Cool. (Hello again)

Welcome Patrick.

I've just bought a used Ibby SR605. Fastest neck I've ever owned. I haven't particularly short fingers but I haven't had years of stretching exercise to help span the first four frets equally well with each finger either. It's easier on this neck somehow. I think the string spacing is about right for me. I am happy to recommend you try one for yourself.

I'm looking forward to it. It'll be interesting to see how good the body is beneath all of that

I'm pretty sure it was a set of tens he had on before. They were getting badly tarnished and the first string was missing so without digging out my micrometer I am not sure. I am interested to see what he thinks of the nines by comparison to the old set regardless. Thanks for the suggestion anyway. As the suggestions have consistently been for tens I am quite prepared to replace the string set accordingly once the lad has tried them out and decided for himself that he preferred the older strings.

Thanks yet again. I'll add that to the check-list for later today.

We've been talking about jamming bass and uke on a number we both know - Another Brick in the Wall pt2. He has a friend of his own age who plays bass with him on that among others. We think it is a good place to start the ball rolling when we see him next. He's like most teenagers, very hard to pin down because he is into everything. I must set up my old Fostex x15 with some new drive belts and a spruce-up all around now that I've got most of my stuff in the same room after years of storage here and there. We might multi-track him on uke and guitar. The old TR606 will serve as a metronome. I will take your suggestions for suitable tunes for novice guitar. Thank you.

Playability is the main thing, I agree. In this case I think the the guitar will benefit from looking slightly leaner too. Not that it was porky looking or owt before... heeheehee. Refinements are what you're good at my friend. I have every confidence in you.

I will check the tuning again today after a play-in. In my head I sound like Jimmy Page but at the same time I can clear a whole room in under ten seconds. I want to re-check the intonation with the new strings. The tuner is showing that a couple of strings don't have the same pitch for the harmonic as the note at the twelfth fret. The saddles are in a straight line. It looks to me as if the last set-up was to make the saddles line up nicely at a slant to the bridge for cosmetic reasons rather than for accurate intonation. When the strings are settled it's tweaky-tweak time. Thanks for the helpful replies. I appreciate the suggestions for 10 thou string sets and I reckon that's okay if you've broken-in your finger tips. He'll learn to make his own string choices later if he gets off the ground with it and I will pass on the advice from here.

Welcome Brendon. Talk about hitting the ground running. Nice collection.

Given that he's not done a lot with the guitar since it was dropped a couple of years ago I've decided to go with 9s. I spoke with my mate Feritt at Foulds in Derby. After we'd talked through the merits of 8s, 9s and 10s he sold me a set of machine heads for around £15 and some strings for £5. The machine heads are of a good standard he says because he's used them before. We reckoned it would be better to go with the light strings and make it as easy for the lad as possible. The set shown has a spare top e. Not a bad thing since the 0.009" is the most likely to break. Whenever we asked him about getting the guitar fixed he would go quiet about it. I have a feeling he got a severe telling off from his dad about it and has been reluctant to go near it since. Today is his fifteenth birthday so it's time we got it fixed for him so he can have a proper go and if it isn't for him, he's got a good guitar to sell and put the money towards some of his sports activities. The old tulip machine heads are packed up in the pack from the new heads and will do for spares. The lad's granddad Jack says he might have them for a uke build. The new ones pop in nice and snug after I clean out the holes with a 10mm auger bit. It turned out that the older heads had a slight taper down from 10mm and there was a bit of crap in there from paint prep at build. 9 to 42s with a spare 9 thrown in Replaced full set of machine heads Full restring Polished frets Cleaned fretboard with lemon oil Checked wiring (good) Tightened nuts at each pot as one was quite loose and the others finger tight only Cleaned, polished and buffed entire instrument It sounds great and that's just through my bass rig. A light refurbish for £20, not bad.

Sorry for the confusion, my mistake.