Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Rowbee

Member
  • Posts

    765
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rowbee

  1. Bump. First post amended last night.
  2. May trade upwards with cash going the other way, interested in an EHX Bass Microsynth.
  3. Back on the list.
  4. I bought this recently from the forum, it is in perfect working order and has been sat on my pedal board. The feet were removed but I can supply them, one of them is ever so slightly damaged but all will glue back on. I've not been using it because I recently changed rig and realised that compression, however transparent, was not part of the sound I was trying to achieve as I'd rather be at the mercy of my technique. I'm looking for [s]£45[/s] £40 posted, pics can be available if there is interest. More information here: [url="http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/dec04/articles/aphexpunch.htm"]http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/dec04/arti.../aphexpunch.htm[/url] and here: [url="http://www.aphex.com/pedals.htm"]http://www.aphex.com/pedals.htm[/url]
  5. That's a good idea, I may well do that, thanks.
  6. Bump! I really want to get rid of this, please somebody take it off my hands!
  7. [quote name='OldGit' post='448666' date='Mar 29 2009, 01:40 PM']ha ha of course not! Any bass player that thinks anyone other then them and maybe the one other bass player in the audience cares a hoot about their sound is deluded.[/quote] Even if it's down to how you cut through the mix better with one than the other or you think the sound of the instrument sounds better with the set of songs you'll be playing? I understand why say an originals band might feel that having the right haircut, wearing the right clothes and holding the right looking instrument is just as, if not more important than the sound produced, but as a musician who isn't interested in "making it" I find that viewpoint a little skewed. I know that the bands I play in take an interest in what gear each other is using for the sounds we're trying to achieve. Just an opinion.
  8. [quote name='josh3184' post='448285' date='Mar 28 2009, 07:29 PM']glad someone agrees! We're evidently more confident in our self image [/quote] +1 - Isn't the sound you produce infinitely more important?
  9. You know, that's not a bad idea but my good lady wouldn't go for it - it's already in the way in kitchen, I think I'd be dead if it gravitated into the front room!
  10. I can't believe this is still around!! Have you considered selling it and then buying when what you're looking for comes along? If I didn't already have two Sterlings I'd be snapping this up!
  11. That is a beautiful looking fish - what's the RRP on a brand new one?
  12. Still available... £15? I really have no use for this.
  13. Just out of interest, how much for collection instead of postage?
  14. [quote name='uzzell' post='443136' date='Mar 23 2009, 09:22 PM']Someone please buy this amp before i do [/quote] Indeed!!
  15. [quote name='dave_bass5' post='440468' date='Mar 20 2009, 04:57 PM']Rowbee. The difference between the LMII and LMIII is more than just having a DI switch. In fact the LMIII also has a level control on the DI (same as our SA450) plus MB have used a new limiter circuit so the LMIII will sound slightly different (better by all accounts).[/quote] Thanks Dave, I was just really going from the product blurb on their website which does mention the level control but not the new limiter circuit. I bow to your superior knowledge on this.
  16. [quote name='GreeneKing' post='438920' date='Mar 19 2009, 08:52 AM']I use a LMII and 2 x GS112's (one NT) and I'm totally happy. In terms of lightness I would argue that if the cabs are a one handed carry how much lighter do they actually need to be?[/quote] +1 I'm using the same cabs as Greeneking but with the SA450 and I couldn't be happier with my tone and the weight - I can get all my gear into a venue in two journeys tops or one if I use my sack truck.
  17. I'm also surprised this is still for sale - if I had the money I'd buy it as a backup for my SA450. I think the only difference between the II and the III is the pre\post EQ option and if you prefer the pre-EQ (which I do) you can get the II changed to this.
  18. [quote name='ahpook' post='438706' date='Mar 18 2009, 09:52 PM']indeedy ! but as far as i gather, nobody really wanted the sabres way back then...at least not as much as the stingrays[/quote] I had a go on Legion's Sterling HH before he sold it - an HH is now on my wishlist.
  19. That blueburst one look pretty special! Seeing that Sabre makes me think they've kind of gone full circle now with the HH models.
  20. [quote name='ALFIE NOAKES 900' post='437202' date='Mar 17 2009, 01:22 PM']Rowbee - It extends the bassiness on offer, big time. Trouble is, it's that tight punchy sound that I'm after, but can't quite dial in. I can't complain about the guitar; merely about my own fickle nature and ever changing preferences, and subsequent cost.[/quote] So you can't dial out the pickup if you want? That's a shame, it's still beautiful though and I'm sure it won't hang around long.
  21. Very, very nice! I recognise that door - wasn't there a picture going around with a G&L in front of it?
  22. Hmm, I was gonna but the tea stain on the manual put me off. Good luck with the sale.
  23. Always ready to appreciate a nice Sterling and that is [i]nice[/i]. How do you find the extra pickup affects or enhances the tone?
  24. Sold to new forum member DMusic - welcome to the forum, Darren.
×
×
  • Create New...