Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bassassin

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Bassassin

  1. [quote name='cocco' timestamp='1416340599' post='2609244'] Defiantly an ibanez! [/quote] Finding one will be the problem, 'cos copy era stuff's not too common in the UK, then accurately dating it. Ibby serials didn't start properly until late '75-76. Jon.
  2. Lucky git! Pictures or it didn't happen, as they used to say on the internets. J.
  3. Old Vince has definitely still got it. Never as good without Dunaway, Smith, Bruce & Buxton though. Jon.
  4. That's MIJ - these were long gone before Matsumoku went under. I know MIJ prices aren't what they once were, but that's a silly, silly bargain! J.
  5. John Hall's on record saying the 4000 series scratchplate isn't trademarked, the other hardware only bears a passing resemblance to Rick parts & couldn't be considered counterfeits by any stretch of the imagination!. Would've looked better with different hardware anyway. J.
  6. The identical Antoria-badged version is much more common in the UK, although still pretty scarce. Cheaper too, probably £350-£450ish, at a guess. Essentially it's a Jazz copy with curly horns, easy-to-break headstock & rather silly country & western scratchplate & inlays, so expect it to sound & play like a good 70s J copy, and look like a cowboy's wet dream! I like 'em. Jon.
  7. I quite like it as an attempt to do a blatantly Rick-inspired bass that infringes no trademarks, and can't attract JH's litigiousness. That said, it's a missed opportunity imo - if it had a cateye soundhole, big inlays & checked binding, I might buy one... Not a fan of the shonky-looking Chickenbacker hardware, though. Jon.
  8. Here's links to a couple of posts I made on the old T-40 thread when I first got this particular bass back in 2010, should help answer your questions: [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/88904-peavey-t-40-basses/page__st__30__p__893179#entry893179"]http://basschat.co.u...179#entry893179[/url] [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/88904-peavey-t-40-basses/page__st__60__p__979260#entry979260"]http://basschat.co.u...260#entry979260[/url] TL/DR, it's 10.75 lbs but IMO the weight distribution might make it seem heavier than other basses of a similar bulk. However plenty of people don't find the weight a problem, and I do have a slightly dodgy back. Buy it & find out for yourself! J.
  9. This is my old T40, traded a few months ago. I can vouch that it's a superb bass, great player, incredibly versatile and was in excellent condition for its age last time I saw it. Good luck with the sale - I'd buy it back if I had the room, the money & a stronger back! Jon.
  10. [quote name='bagsieblue' timestamp='1415568612' post='2601606'] So the truss rod tool would fit into the teeth and adjust the rod? [/quote] They're not teeth - that's a standard hex key truss nut. The bits that look like teeth are caused by the manufacturing process & don't actually do anything. Jon.
  11. [quote name='geoffbyrne' timestamp='1415276994' post='2598655'] Careful, Jon - you live in Scotland........ G. [/quote] Indeed - and I blend in quite well until I open my gob! Weirdly there are two ginger tossers in my band - & neither of us are Scottish. J.
  12. They probably felt that was more politically correct than simply saying "NO GINGERS!" Jon.
  13. [quote name='ash' timestamp='1415128513' post='2597054'] Yes I've seen those decals too! Here's some info about domestic JVs from 21 Frets - [url="http://www.21frets.com/squier_jv/domesticjv.htm"]http://www.21frets.c.../domesticjv.htm[/url] [/quote] Thanks for the link - interesting though, scroll to the bottom of the page & there's a J headstock with the same decals as the Ebay one. No MIJ label. And - on [url="http://www.21frets.com/squier_jv/jv_quick_guide.htm"]this page[/url], discussing "second issue decal" guitars there's this: [quote]Another very sought after domestic model, especially the first JV0xxxx guitars. During mid 1983 the decal style changed to a slightly smaller and less bold script (as per the original pre-CBS decals), the 'Made in Japan' designation also moved to the back of the neck where it meets the body. [/quote] So maybe it's real after all. I think I'd want to see electrics/neck pocket etc though. J.
  14. I do indeed have a Sleekline: [sharedmedia=core:attachments:46249] Anyway, these are MIJ circa 1980 or thereabouts, and quality is consistent with other Fender-derived original designs of the era, like Ibanez Blazers & Aria RSBs. Kawai was a manufacturer as well as a brand, having acquired the Teisco factory in the 60s, and I always felt the styling of the Sleekline reflects some of those odd early Japanese designs. These are nicely-made basses, sen ash body, one-piece maple neck & decent hardware. Despite basically being a Jazz derivative, the Sleekline has a Precision-ish neck shape with quite a curved fretboard radius. Probably the only real weak point was the pickups - useable but a bit thin on my example. Mine's mildly (and reversibly) modified - basically when I got it, it was a bit of a wreck & I gave it a full stripdown & cleanup - I liked it so much with the scratchplate off that I made a cutdown version & stuck some different knobs on it. Swapped the pickups for some from the spares box, which beefed it up a little, & also ended up sticking on a Schaller bridge & some old Ibanez tuners I had lying around... Jon.
  15. Pretty certain that Japan-market JV Fenders (not Squiers) should say Made In Japan on the headstock, not the heel. You can buy those Made In Japan heel decals on Ebay, funnily enough. Jon.
  16. Both Korean & MIJ Hondos had DiMarzios as standard - not all of them by any means though. Quite a lot of Matsumoku-built instruments did too, not Westones, but Vox & Westbury did, and it also turns out [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/248491-1979-matsumoku-aria-pb-550-fretless-maple-neck/"]some Arias did too[/url]. I'm sitting here next to a Kasuga Scorpion which has a Model P as standard - once MIJ stuff started to be taken seriously, a lot of the manufacturers upped their game by using good-quality branded components, including Badass bridges & Schaller tuners as well. These Cort-made Kays came fitted with pickups called "Powersound" (see pic 3 in [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/82420-can-anyone-identify-this-bass/"]this thread[/url]) so the cream coloured unit on the Ebay one isn't original, which is what leads me to suspect it's a pukka DiMarzio in it. It's surprising what they turn up in - I once bought a Satellite P copy off Gumtree for £35 simply on a hunch that the non-original cream P pup was a DiMarzio - and it was. J.
  17. TRC's been flipped to conceal the "Kay" logo, I'd say. I do like these, they're pretty much the first attempt by a Korean manufacturer to produce a serious decent-quality original design. Wonder if it's DiMarzio in the P position? J.
  18. Pretty sure that'll be 1979, not 1987 - Aria stopped making copies around 1980 or so - and Matsumoku shut up shop altogether in '86/'87. It appears they used the same serialisation scheme as Fujigen on some instruments - can't quite see but it looks like the s/n is A790283, which would be the 283rd instrument produced in January '79. Pedantry aside, that's a thing of beauty. Not too many Aria copies made it to the UK, and I've never seen an Aria P with that stunning translucent burst finish, or a factory-fitted DiMarzio - didn't know they did that. That's a proper piece of MIJ history right there, and if I had the space, the money, and the ability to play fretless without lines, I'd be all over it. GLWTS! Jon.
  19. It's also a shoddily flung together, bodged-up piece of crap. [i]How [/i]much??? J.
  20. That's pretty disturbing. I may have nightmares. Jon.
  21. You can date a late 70s//80s MIJ Ibanez from the serial number - The first character represents the month: A=January, B - February etc, the next two numbers are the year and the remaining digits are the production number for the month. I think this one's likely to be '79/'80 - the RS900 doesn't seem to have been around for long. Roadster became Roadstar II in 1981 according to the old catalogue archive - anecdotally "Roadstar" was a misprint/Japlish mistranslation that stuck, should've been "Roadster II"! My RS924 is a lovely bass & a definite keeper. A bit heavy & tonally inflexible (can't blend the pickups) to be gigged very often, but a great bass to record with & pretty much irreplaceable these days. Jon.
  22. Very tidy example, most of these have been beaten to hell & back. Not as early as 1970 (hardly any MIJ copies were), more like '75-'78 or thereabouts. According to my old FCN Music Columbus catalogue, this is a model 0010/H - wonder how they came up with those crazy names? Anyway, nice old bass, good price, glwts! Jon.
  23. [quote name='solo4652' timestamp='1413208813' post='2575821'] The neck pocket looks like a handy place to keep your supermarket trolley pound coin. [/quote] First thing I noticed. Best thing to do would be to yank it upwards & bung your quid in the other side - that might help sort out the trademark 70s Fender wonky string alignment... Jon.
  24. [quote name='RhysP' timestamp='1414183770' post='2586976'] Probably the least desirable Gretsch ever made in both it's bass & guitar versions. [/quote] Gretsch in "bass I'd actually consider playing" shock.. I'd be all over that if it was £150. Jon.
  25. Looks similar to what might happen if someone with negligible woodworking skills took a hacksaw & a rasp to their headstock. Hmmm... Jon.
×
×
  • Create New...