Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bassassin

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Bassassin

  1. [quote name='karlfer' post='860309' date='Jun 7 2010, 08:29 PM']Didn't Hondo use those extra tree strings to get enough break angle for the strings, over the nut? Or perhaps, as ever, I have lost reality. Karl.[/quote] It's the home-made looking Taiwanese Kays that had them - just like the one I saw in Denmark Street at the weekend, priced at £295! Although obviously this suffers the same problem. This is a Hondo though, and the Schaller (I think) tuners it's wearing are probably the best thing about it. I wonder where he thinks you can get replacement Rick-type pickups "cheaply enough"? J.
  2. [quote name='Shaggy' post='858008' date='Jun 5 2010, 10:23 AM']Golden-era Ibanez that, and the Kimbara is tasty too - I remember they always used lovely woods. Bump and a PM [/quote] Replied - albeit belatedly. & bumpski! J.
  3. It's an early 60s JapCrap no-namer similar to the Ibanezes of this era which the Jet Kings are based on: [url="http://www.ibanez.co.jp/anniversary/expansion.php?cat_id=335&now=2"]http://www.ibanez.co.jp/anniversary/expans...d=335&now=2[/url] Looks a lot like the middle one to me, which is an Ibanez 1250 from 1960, according to this site: [url="http://www.sixties-ibanez.com/"]http://www.sixties-ibanez.com/[/url] Has it ever had a badge on it? There would be two pinholes on the headstock where a metal badge was attached to it, if so it might have been an Ibanez. However stuff like this was sold with various names, and frequently with no name at all, so unless there's a badge, or an identifiable marking where one has been, there's no telling what it was. Can't really say who might have made this either, it's not clear which factory built early Ibanez or similar instruments. However, it's a very rare old JapCrap relic & as such pretty collectable to some folks - so if that matters to you, do any cleaning/restoration with utmost care, and if any parts are missing or need to be replaced, avoid irreversible modifications, and keep the old bits! I don't know all that much about 60s JapCrap, so it might be worth asking either on the Ibanez Collectors forum's 60s board: [url="http://www.ibanezcollectors.com/forum/50s-and-60s-world/"]http://www.ibanezcollectors.com/forum/50s-and-60s-world/[/url] Or the JapCrap board at [url="http://www.vintaxe.com/forum"]http://www.vintaxe.com/forum[/url] And if you don't want it, I have a crisp tenner for you... Jon.
  4. [quote name='Bassassin' post='856750' date='Jun 4 2010, 12:55 AM']Keeping it Thunderous - here's a project Thunder III: [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170495007513"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...em=170495007513[/url] Doesn't look like much of a project to me... J.[/quote] Can't believe that after I spotted this, he added a £100 BIN - and I missed it! Hope someone here got lucky. I think I'm losing my touch - I missed a fixer-upper Ibanez Blazer, local to me, a couple of days back. It was £30. J.
  5. [quote name='Bloodaxe' post='857773' date='Jun 4 2010, 10:37 PM']According to the S/N it's an '86 - When did production shift? I thought it was '87. P.[/quote] From what I've read it looks like there was a transitional period and I think 87 was the cut-off point for Matsumoku Arias. It's generally assumed that if it doesn't say MIJ then it's Korean production - but clearly this is all just archaeology & guesswork! Pretty sure I've also read that some late MIJ Arias came from factories other than Matsumoku, so there's no telling how you'd ID those... J.
  6. [quote name='Bloodaxe' post='857526' date='Jun 4 2010, 06:14 PM'][url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Aria-Cat-Pro-2-Bass-Guitar-WHAMMY-Bar-/160440853153?cmd=ViewItem&pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item255b0522a1"]A Cat with an extra tail[/url] Sensible start price, no idea what breed of trem it is though.[/quote] Price would be OK if it was Japanese - this is almost certainly post-Matsumoku Korean - otherwise it would say MIJ on the neckplate. I suppose the W@nkstick might be worth a few quid though! J.
  7. Definitely a 60s Kay, & related to the two in Paul C's pic. I can't be more specific (60s weirdos aren't really my thing) but possibly Korean, Taiwanese, Japanese, East German or even American in origin, because basically Kays were made anywhere cheap guitars were made. You might get an exact ID if you ask on the "Guitars Of Unknown Origin" board at the www.vintaxe.com forum. Jon.
  8. Keeping it Thunderous - here's a project Thunder III: [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170495007513"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...em=170495007513[/url] Doesn't look like much of a project to me... J.
  9. Maple. Works with the cream DiMarzio for the whole 70s vibe. But then again, I'd always say maple, unless it's rosewood with big pearl blocks. Now there's a thought... Jon.
  10. Back again thanks to non-paying Ebay scumbag! [b]Finally sold on Ebay - and he's even paid for it![/b] [u][b]Kimbara - branded Gibson L6S copy, mid-70s[/b][/u]: This is very accurate copy of Gibson's mid 70s L6S, and I'm 99.9% certain this is a Matsumoku build. Kimbara was a brand name owned by UK distributor FCN (Fletcher, Coppock & Newman) and every other Kimbara electric I've seen has been a Mat guitar. Construction of this guitar is identical to the original - sandwich body (probably Sen Ash, in this case) and a set 3-piece maple neck with a hefty volute. The "lawsuit" headstock profile & lack of serial number probably place this at 1975 or a bit earlier - the real L6S was introduced in '73 so it won't be any earlier than that! Some of you might have seen the pic I posted of this when I got it: [attachment=51307:l6sorigcond.jpg] You pretty much never see these, and I paid well over the odds, considering the condition - and was pretty dismayed when I started work. However it became a labour of love, once I started getting it clean I realised that under the paint, filth & general abuse & neglect, it was redeemable. Anyway it's respectable now and I think is a nice example of the type. This one's interesting in having a black-bound rosewood board - every other L6S copy I've seen has a maple board. There's also a curious error if you look closely - the top position marker's been incorrectly placed at the 23rd fret, as has the side marker. Because this was a fairly major renovation there are some replaced parts, and the electronics are not standard. The original L6S had complex custom-designed Bill Lawrence pickups & electronics, and copies like this would have been similar. As the "before" pic shows this had been fitted with one of its original pickups, a replacement humbucker, 3-way switch and coil tap - all of the original electronics were gone. In order to retain the original look I fitted a chrome pickup cover, and planned to wire it with a 3-way rotary switch functioning as a conventional 3-way toggle. Unfortunately ambition outstripped competence here & I was unable to find a diagram showing how to do this, and well out of my depth trying to puzzle it out myself! So presently the switch isn't part of the circuit, and it's wired like a Jazz bass - volume, volume & tone. :blush: A few other bits have been replaced. It had a very broken set of Grover Rotomatics when I got it, these have been replaced with a nice shiny set of Rotomatic copies. The back of the headstock does look a bit like a pincushion but these tuners fit the original holes (this would have had sealed Gotohs with 12 o'clock & 6 o'clock screws) and I've plugged the remainder. I also used a piece of pale wood dowel to plug the hole where the micro-switch had been - it was firmly glued in place before I discovered that clear-coat would sink into the grain & make it go orange. Bugger. A previous abuser had plainly attempted to scrape off the logo before realising it was embedded under about 2mm of poly lacquer. I've filled & polished the scratches and it looks a lot better. There's a fair bit of lacquer cracking on the guitar, particularly noticeable around the back of the headstock & neck/body joint: I was worried by this at first but absolutely none of it's structural - there is no wood damage, the neck/body joint's rock solid and there have been no repairs. The lacquer on this guitar's very, very thick and the cracking is probably more to do with wood expansion/contraction than any external stresses or impacts. Anyway this now looks good, plays very well & sounds good too.
  11. I'm a bit gutted to have to do this because while I might be a Pikey, I'm a guitar collector geek at heart, I love these two and doubt that I will see their like again. But needs must. I can't justify having more than one 2-humbucker LP-type guitar and I'm not parting with my Westbury Standard, so these have to go. Anyway, I'd far rather sell to proper musicians than the slobbering Fleabay hordes, so here's first refusal: Part one - [u][b]Ibanez MC150DS Musician[/b][/u]: This version of the MC150 was only available in 1981 and seems to be one of the least common Musicians. The range was revised in 1982 and fitted with conventional humbuckers, instead of the Super 88 on this guitar. Anyway - this is its only known appearance in an Ibanez catalogue, all the specs are here too: [url="http://www.ibanez.co.jp/anniversary/65/3.jpg"]http://www.ibanez.co.jp/anniversary/65/3.jpg[/url] This guitar dates to January 1981 and has been well-played, but not abused. The only real damage is a chip off the corner of the headstock veneer. There are knocks, scuffs & bumps & a couple lacquer cracks, and a fair bit of buckle rash (which I've clear-coated over to prevent the finish from flaking) but the guitar is 100% rock-solid & good for at least another 29 years. Frets have recently been dressed, and I've wire-wooled them vigorously and it's a lovely player in every way. There are some non-original parts - the Quik-Change tailpiece is a new replacement, the trc is a reproduction and most interestingly, the original tuners have been replaced with 70s/80s Ibanez Velve-Tunes. This is genuinely a massive upgrade, these tuners are rare as popeshit and Ibanez collectors will pay 3 figures for a mint set of these - which these pretty much are. This is probably the best guitar I've ever owned, & NOW SOLD ON BASTARD EBAY. I'm selling because I really do need to pull my finger out & get a new rig rather than just keep whining about it, so I'm very interested in trades involving lightweight, high-power amps/cabs. [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=90339"][b]Part Two - Kimbara L6S Copy[/b][/url] Jon.
  12. [quote name='BigRedX' post='855680' date='Jun 3 2010, 08:46 AM']Not on eBay, but I was hoping that Bassassin has some information about [url="http://www.ishibashi.co.jp/u_box/ubox.cgi?T=syosai&sline=892&print=1&keys2=tachikawa%40ishibashi%2Eco%2Ejp&tid=list3"]this Greco Bass on the Ishibashi U-Box[/url].[/quote] That's lovely! GOB-900, from 1978 as far as I can tell from the serial. These were Fujigen, Japan home market only - and it's like the Ibanez Musician's better-looking sister. I'm guessing these are pretty scarce - looking at the old Greco catalogues, this model appeared in 1978, and is the middle of the GOB range: [url="http://psyco.jp/greco/p/c09_29.jpg"]http://psyco.jp/greco/p/c09_29.jpg[/url] But by '79 the design's been revised somewhat: [url="http://psyco.jp/greco/p/c10_07.jpg"]http://psyco.jp/greco/p/c10_07.jpg[/url] So this particular version was only around for a year. Sorry I can't tell you much more than that, having never encountered one before - and sadly I can't read Japanese! However, I know a man who can - is any of the catalogue text legible enough to translate, Ross? Japanese model designations are weird - they always reflect the price, hence this one was 90,000 Yen when new. Now it's 36,800 - which is an incredibly reasonable £270. Jon.
  13. So Bruce Coyle of Fender GBI can't spell "Squier", the name of one of his company's own products? J.
  14. Very pretty bass - hope it doesn't turn out to be a Photoshop fantasy... But if it does, go buy a [url="http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/stagg-bm-370-vintage-m-series/68744"]Stagguar[/url] (or is that a Jagstagg?) for £130. And take a chill pill! Jon.
  15. [quote name='OldGit' post='853063' date='May 31 2010, 10:28 PM']Depends on how you look at it. There is so much more to the "value" of a bass than how it plays. Kudos, cool, fashion, peer pressure, ebay value, etc The decal on the headstock, where it was made and by whom has a huge effect on it's resale value, no matter how it plays.[/quote] The problem here is that your average Joe Guitard can't tell a JV from a £60 Affinity Squier - and will probably make the same dismissive assumptions. Financial value's something else altogether and I'd love to find a JV P or J at my local car boot for £20, gig it for a couple of years and then flip it for £800 - odd! J.
  16. JVs are as expensive as they are because they're rare & collectable. Indisputably they are very good but you pay a lot for the little letters on the neckplate, you'll find as good quality in other MIJ Fenders & Squiers. Nick's right about the other Japanese brands from the era - and in fact it's strongly rumoured that the very first JVs were actually off the Greco production run & were rebadged as Squier. There's some credence to this because the company which got the Fender Japan contract was Kanda Shokai, owner of the Greco brand, and one of the conditions of their contract was to cease selling replica-standard Greco copies - which is why Greco headstocks & other details changed at this point. JVs and later MIJ Fenders & Squiers came from Fujigen Gakki, the same factory Kanda contracted to build Greco. Sorry - that was probably too much information... Jon.
  17. Tino - I think I've seen you over on the Ibanez Collectors forum haven't I? Wasn't it you that had the very nice CSL LP copy with set neck & vines? Anyway, I'm no particular collector geek (all my old JapCrap basses are players) but if you've been around those sites, you know as well as I do that non-original replacement thumbrests, pickup covers (a Ricky one won't fit this bass!) and missing original parts make a big difference as far as getting a premium price for a vintage Ibby is concerned. It's a beautiful bass, but as for fooling anyone, or impressing Rickenbacker fans - have a look at the comments on Rickresource.com about "Rickenfakers" - they'd spot this from 120 miles away & burn it with relish! Seriously, the early 2388B/DX like yours is the single most inaccurate Rick copy to come out of a Japanese factory. Don't get me wrong, I love them and would be all over one if a bargain came up - but you have to be realistic about what this is, and what you can reasonably expect to get for it - particularly on a bass-savvy place like this! I've been watching Rick copies on Ebay for about 6 years or so (OK, I'm sad - these basses are something of an obsession for me!) and the most expensive sale I've ever seen was an El Maya 4001S (unbound body, dot inlays & very, very very rare) which sold for £656 at the end of 2008 to someone in Sweden, who was likely taking advantage of exchange rate antics. That's commemorated [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?s=&showtopic=270&view=findpost&p=366625"]here[/url] in the Rickenfakers sticky thread, which is now 60 pages and 3 years worth of Faker sightings, discussions & analysis, and is, I dare say, fairly comprehensive! Anyway best of luck with both of your sales - the AFG Rick is a stunner and that's a pretty good price in the current market, and realistically it would be easier to replace than your Ibanez! Jon.
  18. [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130396074041"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...em=130396074041[/url] £45 delivered? If this was aluminium, black or both, I wouldn't be telling you lot about it! Jon.
  19. That's a 1975 or earlier (unless you have the original receipt you cannot state "1974") Ibanez 2388B/DX, the pickups are original - and I would [u]strongly[/u] advise any buyer to leave it that way. These are sought-after & collectable vintage instruments, so non-reversible mods are to be avoided if you want it to retain value. On the subject, Parker_muse is right, £675 for this is very expensive, in the UK these typically fetch around £200 less than that on Ebay - which is, on the whole, a more expensive place to buy & sell than BC. The bass is missing some parts, which would limit its desirability to an Ibanez collector - the pickup cover, finger-rest, string mute and mute adjusters are all gone. Best of luck selling it Tino, but I think you're being a bit ambitious... Jon.
  20. Very nice example, head repair's well done by the looks - was the head detached or just cracked? Shouldn't take much to get that up to scratch! J.
  21. Never heard of this apart from the very first JV (Japan Vintage) Squiers. AFAIK this branding was originally Japanese market only and appeared of a few of the first JVs to be exported, & these will be 1982 basses. Pics would be useful - there are specific vintage features a JV should have. Jon.
×
×
  • Create New...