Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bassassin

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Bassassin

  1. No question the neck's genuine - although that string tree's not original! The only way you'd be able to have much idea about the body would probably be neck pocket fit, and whether the neck's had to have new holes drilled - it's unlikely the originals would line up correctly with a replacement body.
  2. Very surprised this isn't sold yet. This is an RS940 Roadster - I have the fretted version (RS924) and it's a fantastic bass. There are several threads about these circulating on BC and the current price for this one's very good, considering what I've seen RS924s go for recently. I wonder if people are missing the thread - maybe sticking the model number in the title might help.
  3. It really doesn't have a single original idea - P shaped body, skinny maple/blocks J neck and Stingray pickup & EQ! Somehow it all works though, it's a lovely thing to play & really doesn't look or feel like the budget bass it is. Yeah. That's what I thought - this was a Crack Converters blag where I thought - a Laurus/Marleaux lookey-likey for £150? How bad can it be? As it turned out, very!
  4. All the time, probably my main criterion for any bass purchase ever. And that's a lot of basses. Couple of examples, one good: And one absolutely bloody awful: The Lottery Of Functionality aspect might well be a factor in the whole thing, but I don't know. I just like shiny stuff.
  5. Closest I came was a pair of 90s Ibby SR800s, fretted & fretless. Both lovely basses I shouldn't have sold.
  6. Certainly is - a slightly later CMI with the logo revised to reflect the cursive 'M' from the Marshall logo. Much as I like my old MIJ copies, that's as close to a piece of low-end junk as they get. I've had similar, if not 100% identical, & if I was flogging that I'd consider myself lucky to get £100 for it. Seller deserves some recognition for possibly the most delusionally ambitious BIN I think I've ever seen!
  7. You might have to modify your own running order - the Rick 4003 dates from 1981, its predecessor the 4001 was first available in 1961, and the original single-pickup 4000 appeared in 1957. The first Ibby SRs appeared in 1987.
  8. Indeed - everyone has influences (it's hardly overstating to say we all learn by copying) but to suggest there's little left but plagiarism, or at best subconscious recycling seems like a massive expression of negative defeatism.
  9. I've noticed a tendency to bin perfectly good torque-adjustable tuners because they were slipping, & the person didn't understand that they were perfectly good torque-adjustable tuners & they could have just adjusted the torque to stop them slipping.
  10. If you're expected to just note-for-note a pre-existing bass part & not have any input of your own, I suppose it amounts to the same thing. Is that all original music, or just that produced by sad little wannabe local artists? 🤔
  11. Absolute stunner. Great price too - wish I could justify it. Pretty sure some one on here was looking for one of these a couple of months back Also might be worth sticking it on the FB Westbury anorak group. Yeah, obviously I'm a member... https://www.facebook.com/groups/58952112896
  12. Originals, by a big margin. The caveat is that for most of the bands I've been in, I've been the main writer/co-writer - so obviously I have an attachment to & belief in the material that probably wouldn't be there if I was just playing bass on someone else's songs. On the other hand I find covers sets hard work - learning & rehearsing them feels like a chore and gigging them rapidly becomes stale and repetitive. I suppose it's only reasonable though - 99.9% of paying gigs I've had have been covers so it's only right it should feel like a job!
  13. AFAIK the Hi Flyer was the same as Aria's Diamond Mosrite wannabe, but with different pickups. Tried one of these reissues years ago, nice bass, like most modern Arias. Wasn't any £600 new!
  14. Far more wrong than right - the body & scratchplate are great designs, but that's where it ends. Aesthetically the bog-standard Fender headstock looks wrong & is lazy, imo a Tele shape would work better, and certainly not that wonky 80s Ibanez-looking thing above. No issues with the pickups, but they need single-coil & passive switching. For me, I'd like a bound maple/pearl blocks (pearl dots at a pinch) neck & a pearl scratchplate. Also a Squier logo & £399 price tag would make the biggest difference.
  15. I'm not quite there yet, then. Fortunately! 😉
  16. Nah, not for that sort of money. If there's ever a £250 Squier version then I might be tempted to mod one & sort the various ugly & pointless details!
  17. I've been playing for 40+ years and in that time have owned basses that by now must number well in to triple figures - likely double that if you consider the guitars I've owned as well. I have never owned a Fender (or a Gibson, for that matter) and the only US-made instrument I've had was a Peavey T40. This is not something I have any motivation to change. I have easily made a far better living from buying cheap s/h guitars & basses, wiping them down & flipping them for way more than I paid than I ever did (or will) from actually playing them. That's despite, for a few years in the 90s, making most of my income from gigging. I can't read either notation or tab, and have only a very vague grasp of any element of musical theory, despite being a fairly prolific and (some have said) competent composer* of various genres of music, latterly predominantly prog rock. *When I say 'composer', I mean I sit around noodling & sometimes a few bits stick in my head for long enough for me to crowbar them together & make what I loosely think of as a 'composition'.
  18. Thinking about it, the possible rationale for something like this would seem right up 'his' street. As a continuation of 'his' acts of creative charity to the tragically fat-fingered guitar players of the world, simply relocating a bass' tuners to the end of the body will clearly provide similar endless convenience and benefit for the shorter-armed bass player. Was that what Ned S was really thinking, all those years ago?
  19. So, someone looked at a Marleaux Contra & went - "I can make that even more foul!" Winner.
  20. Pretty sure this - or something pointlessly mutilated and mutated in the same way - has been on before. Things that make you go - "why?"
  21. I have the guitar version, always fancied the bass so I had a matching pair. These were sold with various brands (including Jedson & Zenta, as mentioned) but very common unbranded. These were most likely made by Sakai Mokko around 1970/71 (they turn up branded Sakai) but the same German-carved SG body appears on instruments made by Teisco Gen Gakki from the same era, so there may be some element of collaboration, or use of post-factory closure salvage parts, one direction or the other. The vandalised neck on this one shows it has a strip-ply construction, like many MIJ guitars from this era.
  22. I bought a PC specifically to build a recording setup around - I found a useful guide about optimising Windows (I assume you're running 10, not 11) for music: https://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/articles/pc-optimization-guide-for-windows-10/ Interesting (if long & a bit dated now) SOS article: https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/windows-10-musicians As my PC's not for anything other than recording, it's permanently offline unless I need to download or update anything relevant.
  23. That's an Epi ET280, from 1975-ish. These were made by Matsumoku and will be a pretty high-qualty build for what was a low/midrange instrument at the time. If there are intonation issues, that will be a consequence of the positioning of the replacement bridge, rather than any inaccuracy in the fretwork. The other problems sound like basic setup issues, truss adjustment, neck shim, and at the very worst, a fret dress should sort them. These are pretty uncommon in good original condition these days, and unfortunately like any other vintage instrument, 'upgragdes' and 'improvements' will always eviscerate any value it might have had.
  24. Only if you're fond of skulls! A few years back you could find P or J surrounds on AllParts or WD. A bit disappointing how limited the selection of parts is these days.
  25. That's a nice old thing! I think it's a PB-380, and as the 'Gneco' logo suggests, 1973 or earlier. Pickups, scratchplate & controls are non-original, and I'm on the fence about whether or not the body's had a refin - would not be surprised if there were traces of sunburst in the cavities. Anyway, the top row of catalogues here are for the correct era, all showing burst/rosewood PB380s. Fun nerd fact - as with most Japanese home-market instruments, the model number reflects the original retail price in Yen - as prices increase over the years, the model numbers change to match. Here's a Reverb listing for an unmodified PB-380, showing the original scratchplate, knobs & the interesting type of pickup it probably had. https://reverb.com/uk/item/40379321-greco-precision-bass-pb-380n-1973-sunburst-rare-pickup-japan-import
×
×
  • Create New...