Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

PaulWarning

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    4,704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by PaulWarning

  1. [quote name='Paul S' timestamp='1483030016' post='3204294'] I don't know about 'greatest ever' but I prefer these covers over the originals: [/quote]that's a whole new can of worms, there's a long thread about it somewhere, never have much luck with the search facility myself
  2. [quote name='stingrayPete1977' timestamp='1483023536' post='3204210'] This isn't how the kids understand social media Paul, they will find whatever from wherever by whoever whenever, if they like what they see then they will give it a like and follow it. For example Postmodern Jukebox have been on a world tour playing live after people liked their recorded songs on social media. [/quote]you are absolutely right, I don't 'get' social media, I'm just an old fart, never heard of Postmodern Jukebox but I would imagine they got where they are through Social Media recommendations, much like in the old days when you actually met people face to face and someone said "Have you heard so and so, it's brilliant" the same applies on Social Media, but bands liking other bands as a reciprocal agreement can't do any good, you need Social Media users recommending them to other Social Media users because they like them, Social Media has made checking out bands a lot easier but they still need to be properly liked for it to work, or maybe I'm missing something?
  3. you'll like a cover if it's song you like done in a genre you like, for me Hendrix's All Along the Watchtower is the daddy of them all, and if you've just landed from the planet Zog http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLV4_xaYynY&list=PLsgN5r88gaaVIx9qvybey6XI7ulNN5Mx1
  4. [quote name='Mickeyboro' timestamp='1483012332' post='3204070'] That's why I am not on Facebook [/quote]I fully understand that point of view, I wouldn't be if it wasn't for the band, but it is an invaluable tool for letting fans know what's going off
  5. sorry,a facebook 'like' should be because you've actually seen the band and like them, not some sort of reciprocal agreement to get loads of 'likes' completely devalues the system IMO of course
  6. if you're depping fair enough, if you're not you've not practised enough IMO of course
  7. at the end of the day a bass is worth what people will pay, when you see what new Riks cost is it any surprise Fender find a way of getting a big price hike in (which is what the professional series is)
  8. [quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1482882266' post='3203365'] No, a bit of Skiffle but mostly Rock and Roll was their starting point. They were trying to be Little Richard, Elvis and Carl Perkins. [/quote]and Motown type stuff
  9. [quote name='Downdown' timestamp='1482797300' post='3202820'] Is the headline 'vinyl outsells digital downloads' really so surprising in these days of music streaming? Does a spotify subscription, for example, count towards the 'digital downloads' number? Might just be that few and fewer people are actually buying music in any 'collectable' format. Fighting over the dregs of a market doesn't seem like great business to me. [/quote] [quote name='mcnach' timestamp='1482844989' post='3203022'] I think you hit it in the head. People like me still buy the odd CD, but mostly buy digital format music, because I like to own the file and not depend on connection to a service. But I am increasingly finding I am a little 'old-fashioned' among my peers (generally a bit younger than me, I guess because I'm immature so I fit there better ). Then, my girlfriend (who is one notch) never buys any music anymore, and relies on Spotify and some other service entirely. Her friends are the same. I think streaming is not only attractive because it allows you to access almost anything almost anywhere, but because it's interactive and can suggest new music based on what you are generally playing. That leads to discovering new music. It's something I like a lot and even I are started to feel I want to start streaming (as well as buying)... There's been quite a few bands that my gf is playing and I go "how did you find that?" and the reply is "oh, Spotify suggested it". I thought I was enough of a dinosaur when I kept buying CDs (I mostly stopped now, too much space and I rarely use a CD player), but with all the streaming stuff I feel like a grandpa. THEN, the new thing becomes vinyl? Give me a break! [/quote]I did allude to this in my original post
  10. I've learnt, no matter how I try to fool myself, I really don't like Christmas
  11. [quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1482487492' post='3200927'] I guess the people previously moving from heavy gear to lightweight gear weren't listening very closely to what they were buying if moving back the other way sounds so much better. [/quote]auditioning gear in a shop is totally different from playing a gig with a band, plus as wateroftyne said about the honeymoon period, when you've spent good money on gear it takes a while to convince yourself you've made a mistake
  12. I suppose this is where headroom comes in, if you get a rig more powerful than you're ever going to need you're not going to turn it up so much that you damage something, back to the original question, never mind the theory I always try and have my speakers rated a little higher than my amp, just seems to make sense
  13. [quote name='Bill Fitzmaurice' timestamp='1482444104' post='3200732'] Our hearing has a built in warning system that tells us when speakers are in danger of being damaged: they sound bad. When that happens turn it down. [/quote]this is true, until alcohol and adrenalin get involved
  14. [quote name='DanEly' timestamp='1482417483' post='3200390'] I've fairly recently gone from a Ampeg SVT VR to a Aguilar TH500 and then to a Fender Super Bassman. I found the Tone Hammer to be lacking in weight and girth where as the Bassman "feels" better. It has greater depth and more weight behind what I'm playing. Cab wise I just switched from a Ampeg 610 to a Fender 610. I could literally toss the fender 610 through the doors of a venue. [/quote]is the Fender 610 really 41Kg? bit to heavy for me to throw around
  15. [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1482326904' post='3199593'] But surely you don't get any real benefit from heavy amps and cabs in a live situation unless either the majority of your FoH sound comes directly from your rig or you are mic'ing up one or more of the the cabs and that provides most of the bass feed to the PA speakers. Same in the studio. Mic on the cab(s) only and no digital post-processing. Is anyone on here actually doing this? [/quote]majority of our gigs are pubs, just a vocal PA with perhaps a touch of kick drum, besides if you can't hear a good sound it's not very satisfying is it? it's very rare to hear a good bass sound through a PA, it's all bloody bass drum these days
  16. I attended Strummercamp and the sound all weekend wasn't very good, no bass guitar loads of bass drum, then Ruts DC came on marvellous sound, I actually FB'd Segs Jennings the Ruts bass player about it, his reply was that they'd got their own sound man
  17. I have actually done this, sort of, I got a Fender Rumble V3 500, after I decided I couldn't lug my TE combo around but felt strangely unimpressed, bit too clinical is the best way to describe it, plus after the Trace, the EQ section was woeful, so I got hold of first a TE series 6 head and them even better a SMX head (easy one hand lift at 12Kg), which I use with my Rumble as just a Cab, (16Kg) also if my ageing Trace does give up the ghost mid gig I've got back up, happy, so far.
  18. [quote name='RhysP' timestamp='1482244922' post='3198790'] Why would they have? They're just people and, by and large, people are dicks. [/quote] have to disagree with you there, some people are dicks most are reasonably reasonable, though we all have our faults, some peoples you can put up with, some you can't [quote name='Paul S' timestamp='1482245672' post='3198806'] the most important thing I learnt was that being willing to compromise more has not resulted in my willy getting smaller, as I had always previously believed. As a result I am happier in the band. [/quote]yeah choose your battles.
  19. there's no bad music, just music I like and music I don't, so don't go around dissing other peoples work
  20. I suspect this will be the last Stones album, it has a certain symmetry, that they gone back to where they started, not a big fan of the blues and I won't be buying this record, but good for them I say
  21. scooped and trebley, sounds great on it's own, disappears into the mix when everybody else kicks in, especially with overdriven guitars, be prepared to be disappointed if you get near this tone, just my opinion of course
  22. [quote name='kodiakblair' timestamp='1482120115' post='3197785'] Great album,not every tune was brilliant but enough were to make it great. Pinched my copy from Woolies. [/quote]so it's your fault they went bust
  23. I started a similar thread might be worth a look, not had any problems since I installed ublock http://basschat.co.uk/topic/295125-virus-security-update-error-0xb9558441-help-desk-0800-086-9828-toll-free/page__fromsearch__1
  24. we've been using Wharfdale Titan PA speakers for about 10 years, no issues at all, oh apart from the speakon sockets, not much help to you though
  25. [quote name='bazztard' timestamp='1482122173' post='3197787'] Mick sounds like a white boy trying too hard to sound black. How did he get away with it for all these years. [/quote]they got away with because back then nobody knew how the originals sounded, and probably still wouldn't if it wasn't for bands like the Stones exporting to the USA their own music, a neat trick don't you think? I've listened to the album on Spotify but I'm not a huge Bues fan, I soon get bored with it but don't find it annoying
×
×
  • Create New...