Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

javi_bassist

Member
  • Posts

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About javi_bassist

  • Birthday 26/05/1992

Personal Information

  • Location
    Madrid

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

javi_bassist's Achievements

Experienced

Experienced (11/14)

  • Great Content Rare

Recent Badges

523

Total Watts

  1. In my case, I never had a U4. However, I had some interference with some wireless going in 2.4 so I bought directly the U45. My other bandmates (3 people) uses the U4 without any issue. Open question for the guys who use stereo. How do you setup? My Sennheiser XSW is capable of stereo, but I just used it to mix the bass in one channel and the rest of the band in the other.
  2. I am using and abusing (for 6 months, at least 3 gigs a week) the Xvive U45. The rest of my band has the U4s and we are all happy with them. I have to say that I have mine attached to my pedalboard because I have a Rolls PM351 before it to level my bass myself (I had horrible experiences with soundguys). Except for ona project that we make our own mix using an app, for the rest I use the Xvive. I have used the Sennheiser XSW in the past with good results. Some droputs sometimes, but it was all good overall.
  3. I cannot say my case is the same as yours, but I got myself a pair of Shures 535, which are a little bit boosted in the mids. First time I tried them, I found them awful. Really mid boosted, no bass, clanky and incredibly annoying. I changed the tips to ones that fit me better and the result was incredibly different. I love them. Another thing that happened to me a couple of weeks agois that I was going to play for the first time with my Sennheiser IE100 with custom molds. In the soundcheck, it was all boomy with a lack of definition. My thoughts were "this gig is going to be hard and I hate my custom molds". Then, I heard myself during the gig perfectly. The issue was that the soundguy had the sublows boosted and the subwoofers just below me were too loud. Even with custom molds. I cannot really explain why this happened, but it did. Man, perfect seal is everything. But also be aware of the shape of the in ear itself. I cannot use KZs because they just pop out from my ear. And I tried several different tips. I moved to smaller in ears (Sennheiser and Shure) because of that
  4. I also had (and still have, being my number 1) a 735 and I got myself a BBP34
  5. Hahahaha. They are really the exact same in size. My IE100 are red and my IE400 are black, so I cannot confuse them. Yesterday, I used my IE400 in a gig and I find that the IE100 and 400 are very similar. I think the 400 sound a little bit better, but since I have my 100 with custom molds, I may be using them more hehe.
  6. I tried them in two different gigs I had this last weekend. I have to say that they are great. It was the first time for me using custom molds and they fit perfectly. So perfectly that they are difficult to remove hehe (I cannot just grab them from the in ear itself because I could damage it. It happened to a friend who went custom molds in the same place with his IE400). The sound improved. I have to say that during soundcheck I was concerned because there was too much low end without any definition, I control my in ear with a Rolls and I couldn't find a sweet spot. However, as soon as we started the gig, everything was perfect. Bass had a lot of definition and I loved it. Low end is now more present and highs were a little bit rolled out (not so much, but a little bit. I prefer it this was to be honest). Do I recommend it? Absolutely.
  7. My two boards updated: Board #2: Simple. Peterson Tuner-->JHS Prestige-->Ampeg Opto Comp-->JHS Colourbox v2. I use the Prestige to give a little boost and also to have similar signals from different basses. The Ampeg Opto Comp because I wanted an optical compressor and I kinda like it. And the JHS Colourbox is a really really good clean preamp. I made this board because last time I recorded for a singer, the producer just use a Neve kind of preamp and an LA2A compressor and I just love the sound. The Colourbox is the closer I got in a pedal. The Opto Comp might be replaced in the future, but so far, so good. And this is my main board: A few days ago Jad Freer uploaded this image. I must admit that it took me some time to fully understand its potential and I think it is a game changer (for me). With the HX Stomp I always had this "internal fight" that if I put the preamp before the HX Stomp (or in the loop) I lose the ability to have a DI, and if I put it at the end, there are some effects that are affected by the preamp. With this solution, I can have the Capo anywehre in the chain inside the HX Stomp and still being able to use the DI. I can even use both DIs out because one would be still totally clean and the other one with all the chain. So this is my pedalboard, plain and "not-so" simple: Canvas Tuner-->Jad Freer Capo In the loop: HX Stomp In the loop of the HX Stomp: Cali76 With this pedalboard, I can have the Cali76 and the Capo anywhere in the chain of the HX Stomp. I hace currently a chorus effect after the Capo and it sounds much better after than before it.
  8. I just wanted to comment something. While my custom molded are being made, I had a couple of gigs this last weekend. My KZ KZ10 broke so I did not have any in ears (I have a spare cable but back home and the gig was out of town, I could not go and get it). I had to go with a friend of mine (also professional bass player) to a store nearby to get one. There were not many choices, and I got Shure 535s. A bit expensive but my friend told me that they were the ones he was using. I went to soundcheck and, even though I could hear the bass and everything a little bit more clear than with the Sennheiser IE400, the sound was awful. With too much mids. So I tried to change the eartips to another pair that comes with the headphones, foam and bigger. They sealed perfectly and went back to soundcheck. Oh man what a sound... I just love them. Compared to the Sennheisers, they are clearer. I can hear everything better. I find the IE400 to be more musical, much better choice to listen to music. However, when I play with them at a gig, when everyone was in a bassy part, I could not hear myself that clear. I could feel there was my bass, but not hear it clearly. With the Shures, I can hear it. I compare it to the IE400 because they are the ones I had been using for a year and I had the IE100 for spare. However, I have a friend who had problems with the custom impressions and the IE400, so I tried with the IE100 just to see if I prefer custom impressions. I have always avoided the Shures in general because it seems like the general consensus in all forums were that they were not good. All I can say is that I love them. I used it in both gigs and they were amazing.
  9. Last Tuesday I went to get custom impressions for my Sennheiser IE100. Let's see how they work.
  10. I'm experimenting with some of them. Not 100% convinced, but they are usable. I'm liking the unit more and more, but it is not plug and play.
  11. I really like the sound out of it. I am still trying compressors, but they are good. I might go back to my Cali, I don't know. There is a feature that I love and it is the ability to have different Input levels and have them in the memory. I play different basses and that feature is pretty awesome I think
  12. I am currently using the Boss instead of the HX. It sounds really good, but it is 0 intuitive
  13. I have one and I love it, but I agree. I had to raise it a little bit so that my Cioks SOL could fit perfectly without touching the floor.
×
×
  • Create New...