G4M had a damaged Boulder Creek 5 string electroacoustic rrp £849.99 listed for ages at £399 and it didn't sell. It has just been relisted for £699. Must be the same as the pics of the damage are the same.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Boulder-Creek-EBR3-5-String-Electro-Acoustic-Bass-DAMAGED-RRP-849-99/303015541921?epid=1905094524&hash=item468d223ca1:g:AKMAAOSw899bf~JL:rk:2:pf:0
I'm not interested in buying it but certainly interested in the thinking behind the huge price hike.
I'm thinking 'like a bassist, but more so' - a kind of superlative. So perhaps he is happy with 'just' a guitarist, drummer, keyboardist but fancies something a bit special on bass.
Could be a typo, of course.
The thing is - does it really matter? These topics always seem to degenerate into some wort of 'my gang is better than your gang' type thing. You like a P bass/Stingray/Rickenbacker - great. You don't like them - also great. There is room for all without the mud slinging.
Kind of similar thing for me. I spent a lot of money importing a Yamaha BB5000 from Japan, only to not 'bond' with it in any way. Similar story a few years ago with a Westone Pantera Deluxe X790 - first time I saw a picture of one I was smitten. Eventually found one for sale in Holland, happened to be going to Holland so I picked it up. Didn't ever bond with that either.
The main issue with both was that they didn't sound like P basses. I've come to terms with this now.
Black Sabbath. For me the first 4 albums created and defined the genre of 'Heavy Metal' but, for me, they went a bit off the boil apart from the odd song here and there. Then Ozzy left and it wasn't BS any more, despite the name.
Nik Kershaw arranged a lot of his stuff for acoustic, I think there was an acoustic album back in the day but he toured last year with an acoustic one man show. Works fantastically well.