Baloney Balderdash

I suppose it might admittedly be kind of an odd reason for commenting on such an old reply, but couldn't stand the temptation for saying that by far most basses and guitars are made entirely from what is categorize as hardwood.

I suppose the obvious answer would be that the copper tape at the nut somehow makes better contact with the strings than my fingers against the strings, would definitely perfectly explain this phenomena, however the strings at that point are still their full thickness and fully coated, and there is no possible way the copper tape could cut the strings, if anything the copper tape cause less friction than the bare nut, heck I couldn't even cut my fingers on that copper tape if I did an effort to do so. Then again I suppose the strings would press harder against the copper tape in the nut slots than my fingers do against the strings under normal circumstances, so I'd say it is still a quite plausible, and probably most likely, explanation. Guess I just never gave the fact that the strings are actually fully coated much thought myself, and that pressure might change the degree of conductivity/quality of the connection, since there is still definitely some conductivity/connection happening even at low pressure, as some noise reduction is actually happening just by touching the strings lightly. Certainly a more scientifically plausible explanation than it being shielding tape and just living up to it's name.

You never got further than the headline did you? Nothing to do with my actual question whatsoever. But I guess thanks for at least taking a guess on a possible help. I suppose I can try to condense the main essence of this mystery and my question a bit more, though I am not sure whether the reader would understand the nature of the mystery fully then: The noise almost entirely disappear when touching the bridge directly, but there is less noise reduction happening when just touching strings, but not the bridge, at any point, however when touching the nut (lets just say it's a metal nut for ease of understanding the phenomena) and nothing else, which only connection to ground could possible be through the strings, again the noise almost entirely disappear, just like when touching the bridge directly. What could the explanation for that possibly be? Might also be worth mentioning that the strings in question are coated Elixir Nanoweb nickel roundwounds.

First I like to point out that I am not really seeking to solve an issue here, but rather curious about solving a strange mystery. So I got an EMG Geezer Butler P pickups installed, which is shielded internally, and with the ground of the pickup wired running as a braided shield all along the insulated hot wire, so to start with the noise picked up/generated by this pickup in minimal, and not really an issue at any point, however at the moment I am rearranging my usual pedal board completely, so I use a temporary simplified pedal setup that run off a daisy chain, rather than the isolated power supply of installed on my pedal board, which does cause slightly more noise than usual. Now to the mystery, as you would expect the noise gets less when touching any metal parts of the bass, thanks to the bridge ground wire, however while the noise almost entirely disappear when touching the bridge directly it is reduced notable less when touching across the strings, regardless if this happens above the body, above the pickups, above the fretboard, or above behind the nut, ever so slightly more when combining two of these positions by using both hands, but now for the really strange part, I recently installed some copper shielding tape on in the nut slots (a thin piece the width and approximate length of the nut, going across it, and then by the strings pressed down wrapped closely to the sides and bottom of the four slots), to compensate for the thinner strings I have installed to accommodate the tenor bass tuning I currently use this bass in, and when I touch the tape on the nut it removes just as much noise as when I touch the bridge directly, that is the noise almost entirely disappearing. What on Earth (pun fully intended) could the reason for this be? I mean I guess it is to expected that the ground connection might be more effective when touching the bridge, to which the ground wire of the electronics of the bass is connected, directly, than just touching the strings, especially cause since these specific strings are coated Elixir Nanoweb ones, but why then does the ground connection seem to be just as effective when touching the shielding tape applied to the nut, but not when touching the strings just in front or behind the nut (I mean the ground connection of the copper tape has to come from the strings, which again got it from the bridge)?

If I had the money to spend right now, though I don't, especially not because I am likely going to pay an additional import fee for having them send to Denmark where I live, I would have bought the Mosky Spring Reverb (I know it doesn't sound all that much like an actual spring reverb, but I really liked what I've heard non the less on the demons I've watched featuring it), and 4 mode RAT and Klon clones (I know their regular Klon clone gets a lot of praises, and won several blind tests against original Klon pedals, and I own their Black Rat rat clone, which I am really happy with, even if it doesn't sound quite like the original it works really well with bass).

Ok, so what about this strong argument against the use of tonewood: If tonewood really is so great how come the bridge isn't build out of wood too?

I did actually think that Cortex didn't sound quite right, but then decided that Thomann would probably know best. Guess I should have known better, after all the specs listed for several of their basses are either outdated or straight out wrong. Thanks for correcting me though. For the sake of documentation: https://www.thomann.de/dk/elixir_12302_baritone_nanoweb.htm

Who's Loss is This - Menfolk On which I play the bass (out of 2 basses) with the brighter tone.

Well, can't help you. For me when the first note has been identified I pretty much think in intervals and patterns going forward, meaning that as long as it's standard tuning (all fourth tuning), and tuned up or down a whole step, I have no issues in terms of orienting myself on the fretboard. I did play in a band for years where I was using a drop D tuning, and admittedly I sometimes found myself reminding my self that the low D should be played two frets ahead to get the same note/interval, but most of the time it eventually became kind of second nature when playing with that band, and no issue really going back to regular E standard tuning. I also had my short scale classical nylon string acoustic guitar tuned to D standard tuning for years, and at the moment my main instrument of choice, a just 28.6" scale Ibanez Mikro Bass, is tuned in tenor bass, A standard, tuning (that is like the 4 upper strings of a 6 string bass tuned in regular B standard tuning). Personally though I would probably tune my bass up to E standard tuning, if I was you. But hey, honestly I can't see the big issue in keeping it in D standard tuning either, the 2 extra notes in the bottom range might still come to use, even if the guitar(s) are tuned to regular E standard tuning.

Stop it, will you!

Yeah, but not what we are discussing, I was commenting on your reply in specific, hence why I quoted it, not even the topic of the overall discussion in this thread. But never mind, seems I missed a detail, where you actually specify those other factors as affecting the string vibrations, just like I stated. Sorry, my bad. Please refer to the edit my previous reply. But frankly you could just have pointed out that that was what you said, instead of this silly deroute argument...

I don't see you mentioning these factors, in the reply of yours that we are discussing here: Edit!: Oh, damn, sorry, seems like I didn't read your reply properly, my bad. *doh*

Yes, but it is not ONE of the factors, it is THE factor! Please refer to it in the context of your own full reply (and then my full reply). All the other factors you mention have an influence on the tone only because they influence on how the strings vibrate.

Which P Bass? James Jamerson's or Jean-Jacques Burnel's? But to be serious for a moment and actually answer your question without being snarky: Because it got a P pickup placed in the traditional P Bass position. However that does not mean that it sounds exactly like any given P Bass made out of any given type or piece wood, I will almost guarantee that it in fact doesn't, or that the specific construction and specific material used doesn't actually affect the tone to some, greater or lesser, degree, depending. Please distinguish between general and specific here. That a zebra got 4 legs and a horse also got 4 legs doesn't prove that it is in fact the one and same animal. Neither would someone not being able to tell the difference between two individual horses (something someone actually working with horses likely would be able to tell), even if the two horses in question were actually of the same race and objectively, from a general perspective, did share a lot of the exact same visual traits. Again faulty logic.

No it doesn't. Faulty logic! This though might very well be true. No. Not on an electric guitar and bass with a magnetic pickup. However it is basic physics that the resonance caused by the specific construction and materials used of any given electric guitar or bass will actually affect the vibrations of the strings.

Thank you. I need to have my old computer set up again though, where all my music production related software is on (can't be assed to install all that, especially not the buttload of individual VST's I got on it, on my new computer again), as well as I need to buy a dedicated screen for it and a new audio interface (cause my current one is pretty crappy and has developed issues), so I will have a dedicated music production computer/setup. And as I am not in the best financial, or mental for that matter, situation it might take a while before I can even start to get the first recordings down. Hopefully somewhere before next year though. I already have some working titled and a preliminary track list in mind (which though might very well change, as I might come up with new material, or scrap some of the current ones): Dreamscape Mystery [short instrumental] 3rd Eye of Hypnos Daze of Our Life A Dorian Odyssey [long instrumental] Monolith Meadow Spacing Out In Orbit Out of Space [short instrumental] Doctor You (we die only once...) Crystal Meth Overdrive Utopian Mist [long instrumental]

As far as I am concerned you are the troll here, and your reply was exactly as far out as my response to it. And you know it!

Great point! How about the owner(s) of this forum donated the money used to run it to research in cancer instead. After all could we all live with basically being responsible for people dying, just because we enjoy discussing bass? How can people defend using money of a paid membership to this forum, or new music equipment for that matter, when people are actually dying because of it?

Seems like i haven't mentioned yet that I actually got a doom/stoner rock project going myself, named "all I nil". A solo project where the core main instrumentation will be a tenor bass (that is a bass tuned to A standard tuning, like the 4 upper strings on a 6 string bass in regular B standard tuning), programmed/played via a weighted keys midi keyboard drums/percussion, and then vocals, with some more sparingly used additional, flavor oriented, programmed and physically played instrumentation added. So far I got 7 more, but mostly less, traditional regular stoner/doom songs, and then an additional 4 more folky instrumentals, where almost all the bass parts and the form of the songs is in place, that just needs to be recorded down and then having drums and additional instrumentation added. This is the "amp-less" setup that I use for this project: But planning to at some point add an EHX Attack Decay, an EHX Freeze at some point, as well as a TC Electronic Ditto X4 looper, and then possibly an EHX Bass9 (to be able to play lower than A1), and possibly some of the other EHX 9 pedals as well, mainly interested in the B9, Mel9 and Synth9. And I should add treating my tenor bass as sort of a hybrid bass/guitar in terms of how and what I play on it, as well as I make use of a slide, obviously for slide guitar/steel guitar like stuff, and a mallet, used to play dulcimer like stuff. My Ibanez GSRM20 neck + GSRM20B body Mikro Bass, that I named "Dud Bottomfeeder" , with the stock pickups pulled out, replaced with just one EMG Geezer Butler P pickup, wired directly to the output jack socket, the stock side mounted barrel type jack socket having been pulled out and replaced for a front mounted regular jack socket, and tuned to tenor bass, A standard, tuning :

If you use 3 fingers it doesn't take much speed or stamina to gallop fast. I use a combination of various finger picking/plucking techniques, depending, as well as I am quite adept at playing with a pick, but by far the easiest way to do the typical Iron Maiden galloping thing is using 3 fingers, for me it almost comes automatically that way, and as said doesn't require much stamina or speed. Edit!: And yes, as someone pointed out, use a light touch, more so stroking the strings, with a light slapping motion, rather than striking or pulling them. And imagine a sort of a fluently rolling wave motion with your fingers as you stroke the strings.

Honestly... That looks freaking awesome. Not looking that far away from some of the more daring experimenting and arty builders out there come up with. The bridge might be a bit to the more "alternative" side, not sure what what appears to be an additional shallow rectangular cavity near the neck is for, and the top and bottom string does look dangerously close to the edge of the fretboard, but other than that, really, really cool in all its brute rawness! What scale length was/is it?

Well, that is exactly what would make it interesting and special. I think we all are familiar with having been obliviously ignorant teenagers, so I doubt you'll loose any cool street credit by refusing to post pictures of your deformed creation, rather perhaps quite on the contrary. But of course it is your instrument and entirely up to you. In any case thanks for the additional information about it.

Well the alignment would have been even worse had he not set up the bridge this way. As he also actually does mention in that video. He set it up this way to compensate the best he could for the misalignment.

Seems like it paid off firing all those people last year, huh? Next time though it might be worth to consider not to base who is fired on who are not cross-eyed, and instead base it on who are. And stop making it count extra on job applications if you are.