Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

warwickhunt

Member
  • Posts

    10,862
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by warwickhunt

  1. In simple terms bass amps have 2 sections pre / power. The preamp section takes the signal from your bass (passive or active) and boosts it, generally by some form of pot / gain control to a level the power amp needs and then the power amp gives you the level for your speakers. Some amps have a button before the preamp which can be labelled Hi/Lo Active/Passive which helps match input levels. A preamp 'before' your amp simply means that you won't turn the input gain up as far or need to use the active/passive button. The DI level should be matched at the desk so that is not your amps problem. If you need more volume from your gear on stage I'd say the issue lies with your speakers... not enough of them or not sensitive enough.
  2. Yeah it isn't even like the decimal point could be in the wrong place.
  3. Unless those variables are what makes the sound you like. I don't like 'neutral', I actually like speakers/drivers that have colour (haven't established the exact shade but it may be purple).
  4. Indeed but those are the amps which the likes of yourself may plug into (HAVE plugged into) and walked away from but it would be a worry if every manufacturer were building the curve/dip that couldn't be defeated and thus NO amp would fit your needs but then you will always have a Leszek come along and capture a share of the market that doesn't want 'that' tone.
  5. Blimey, oh for the old days when you just bought an amp to make yourself louder than the drummer! Surely 'flat' on any given bass amp is of absolutely no use or reference? All you need to have is an amp that when the controls are set in the centre position you have a basic sound that works for you when used in conjunction with your other equipment; that way you have + or - any given amount to tweak for room vagaries etc. Taking an amp and running it through spectrum analysis or whatever to find the reference to start from is meaningless if at this flat point you have one or more of your controls at a near max/min of its available travel. Plug in, put everything in the middle, if it doesn't sound OK/good walk away to the next amplifier.
  6. How much lighter than a standard are these LT basses?
  7. It is WIDE... 59mm nut / 68mm 12th fret to be exact. I need to play with a plectrum so the inverted strings are not ideal but workable.
  8. I've owned an 8 (Warwick formerly owned by Hellmut Hattler custom paint job) and found it fine to play even at a gig, the 12 in the house is OK. It's when you need to get it 100% correct and fret all of the notes/strings AND deal with the sound of the rest of the band! However, yes it will be a slow build rather than 2 x 45 straight off. Luckily I took other basses (short and long scale).
  9. So I rehearsed with the Musicvox tonight... I have an ABSOLUTE new respect for Tom Petersson! I've owned 12s in the past but never used them in anger, boy o boy o boy is that different to noodling in the house. How the hell does Tom get through a 30 minute support slot never mind 90 mins+ and he doesn't ever switch back to 4 strings live.
  10. Yes the 12 is 'inverted'... not sure if that is easier or harder to play. Turns out this Musicvox was a prototype where they were going to offer an inverted string option... like anyone cared. LOL @BigRedX yes the guitarist has a range of guitars (Les Paul, Hamer etc) but the multineck thing is even more obscure than my 12er but you are correct it puts it in perspective for the band/me. I suppose I just want to do the role to the best of my ability; the fact that I have a similar appearance and look to TP is (genuine) coincidence... I think.
  11. Yes I think that is the only viable option to get as close to the Hamer B12A as is possible; making the B12S would involve a massive double cut body. Sounds ridiculous as I am the initiator of this thread but I've discovered a variation on this Musicvox to all other Musicvox or any other 12 string that I've subsequently researched and I didn't even notice it when I was trying/collecting it! Can you see what it is?
  12. It is! Is that the Antoria/Hamer? It would look like Ally Lee playing a Uke if you played it (local 'in' joke)!
  13. Nice idea @Maude... except they are both set neck / thru neck, not a bolt or screw in sight!
  14. 13 years later (THIRTEEN) I bought another bass from Benedict and as easy as pie and exactly as described.
  15. Yes thanks the merits were discussed earlier. The Musicvox acquisition likely eases back on another full blown 12 string purchase (Sod's Law a pukka Hamer TP turns up now) but who knows.
  16. OK we are 2 steps closer to resolution... and 3 steps further back at the same time! Unbelievably I stumbled (after hours of Google searches and trawling) upon an actual bona fide 12 string bass not 30 minutes from where I live. Not the bass I want or need but as a used purchase, if it comes to nothing, I can sit with it as an objet d'art/talking/laughing point until such time as another sad git comes along looking for a 12er. I have also purchased the short scale Hamer double cut look alike highlighted in this thread (cheers @benebass), which might or might not form part of the travelling circus that is my Cheap Trick tribute. Options are all on the table with what I can/can't do now so I'm taking EVERYTHING to the rehearsal tomorrow and seeing where we go. It doesn't take a genius to work out that the Musicvox does NOT balance (hence the old stylee acoustic guitar string anchor to the neck). Start pointing out the obvious does/don'ts by all means and I'll sit and try to figure out wtf I am doing next! LOL
  17. Indeed and I checked out his amazing work but going off comments on various sites/threads, we'd be talking easily in excess of £3-4k. Not saying his work isn't worth that, it is but am I going to max my budget out on this project... I doubt it.
  18. Ah OK so not butchering the existing body but as it is a BO neck, just transfer the neck and all hardware onto another (custom made) body... got it.
  19. If I was to buy the DP12 £1200 and then have it reshaped, I think I'd still be the thick end of £2k and have something that is an approximation and I'll have ruined any residual value. You tend not to get 'casual' gig attenders at Cheap Trick tribute gigs. Those at a gig will likely fall in 2 camps; 1 - non-bassists who wouldn't know if I was playing an encore P bass or one of Tom's actual instruments and 2 - BASSISTS... who will take one look and say 'Has he just buggerd up that DP bass to fool us?' If I was purely buying a 12 string bass as an instrument the DP would be on a short list but as an instrument for the purpose of a tribute bass, I'm unlikely to go that route.
  20. I kind of get it but do you know of a bass like that?
  21. Can I just say that all/any of this input (inc messages) has been and continues to inform my thought processes... please don't think I am trying to pick holes in suggestions, it is genuinely helping come closer to a/several decisions!
  22. Defo a consideration if I was going custom or customising an existing bass but lots of permutations still on the donor bass and/or accessing hardware. I suppose modifying an existing 8 string to be a 12 string is the most viable option for this scenario BUT on reflection (as I type this) an 8 string would look visually correct and sound just about right for 80 - 90% of an audience (the other 10 - 20% being bassists in the audience) so is it worth modding to 12 string... especially as the anally retentive percentage will be tutting at the inaccuracies any way. LOL
  23. That is about correct £0.00 > £5000 (I have to impose a limit somewhere).
×
×
  • Create New...