Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

warwickhunt

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    10,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by warwickhunt

  1. Formerly Known (as) Altus - FNA. I was around (and sober enough) to remember this silly anecdote 1st hand.
  2. A few quick questions; what's the width of the present neck, do you have the previous neck, where are you and what does the bass weigh?
  3. LOL Just found this! Yes Lee does tend to like it loud but you're lucky you didn't have our regular drummer in... he's harder/louder. Might be an opportunity coming up for you to dep for me again, ideal opportunity to see how your R400 handles it.
  4. Has anyone asked for the weight... can I?
  5. I had a carbon neck B2 and yes the board was fairly flat but I recall the neck finish was obvs smooth but don't recall it being satin or slippy/silky; it had quite a glossy neck and I've had wooden necked/lacquered basses that were slicker.
  6. Have you ever seen the 90's Vester Clipper? Looks a bit like a Thumb but with less of a stretch (still full scale); fraction of the cost and not badly put together.
  7. Superb, easy transaction with James for his Sadowsky. Many thanks.
  8. God knows which current models have 3 band because they are all over the shop (as outlined in this thread) but mid 90's saw the introduction of the 3 band to the NT Streamer range but you couldn't get it on the Dolphin as the control layout was only ever 2 stacked pots. I've seen 3 band on the same period Thumb basses but for the life of me I can't recall if it was made standard or as an option; to further cloud my fuddled mind I 'think' the 5 string Thumb from mid 90's on did have 3 band EQ.
  9. The double cut just works better for the relationship between the top strap button and it's relativity to the 12th fret, the tele version is nowhere near as far up the neck hence the imbalance. I've not got both to A/B but weight won't be too dissimilar (i.e. LIGHT).
  10. You've nailed most of the pertinent points Jules! Be aware that even these early Fender shaped acousticaster basses with the long upper horn are still light enough that they have a tiny bit neck dive but nowhere near the later ones and tbh they are light enough that it is worth the price. They do get a lovely amplified tone and 'probably' one of the better fretless basses for emulating upright. They won't however, stand any chance unamplified in an acoustic setting but make nice noises when playing in the house and no other instrument to compete with.
  11. Nowhere near you but I have one. Was there something in particular you wanted to find out or experience, might be able to describe. 😉
  12. There is the odd acoustic which if played hard can just about keep up (is it the Tacoma Thunderchief that is meant to be OK?) but the vast majority just won't be heard with any great authority, especially if there are two acoustic guitars and they are full on strumming rather than picking.
  13. As has been said, if an acoustic bass is to be used truly acoustic it won't be heard above a firmly strummed single acoustic guitar! I own a Washburn AB20 bass and it needs to be amplified if played with other instruments; fine for playing by itself in the house but amplification is needed in 90% of the situations where you'd need play an acoustic. However, if it is for that tone and you know you are going to be boosted then I hope you can find one soon.
  14. I've gigged this twice and I am genuinely gutted that you own it... and I don't! Despite gigging with an amp x6 the power of the Handbox, I never had a problem with volume or authority of tone. Enjoy the amp and if you decide it isn't for you... you know where I am.
  15. The only SS amp that I can think of that can't be run without a load is the Warwick Hellborg amp, all other SS amps are fine. What amp is it?
  16. Never heard of a courier who will pack an item and I guess if there were one it would cost a fortune, so I'll need to pass.
  17. They do look lush but I see neck-dive written all over that top strap-button position.
  18. Still looking. Thought I had one last year but the guy had a rush of blood to the head and believed what he'd been told on a Warwick group; consequently the price went from acceptable to down right stupid. Oddly enough none of those offering advice on value would put their hands in pockets and pay the price they'd suggested.
  19. LOL Looked at this a few times and I think it has been pretty much nailed! 'Personally' I feel the pre 91 basses were generally made from/of better quality woods and materials (other than the chocolate output jacks... buy a Switchcraft and be done with it). Why W can't role the fingerboard edges on new basses is beyond me mind, that would make such a difference. Electrics are pretty much standard now, though I did prefer it when you could have EMG, MEC, Bart, SD even Alembic. Neck profiles are so personal that it's a case of meat/poison; I have to admit to having some pretty skinny neck Wicks but also possess a very full (maple) necked 07 NT Corvette and I love the feel. I agree the whole catalogue is pretty messed up and dilution of the brand has occurred. Replaceable truss rods were a good thing BUT you shouldn't need to do it anyway and tbh the stories grow bigger in the telling, I've had basses with issues (2 out of 40+... is that good/bad ratio) but all are fixable (unlike some manufacturers). Oh and one shouldn't place 'too' much faith in the official emails/info supplied by Warwick... it may not contain 100% accurate info. Finally, never buy a new Warwick; you may as well drive down your street throwing tenners out the window.
  20. If this was in the NE I'd have it... and I don't even need it!
×
×
  • Create New...