lapolpora

Tell me more type PM sent

Hi All, Sorry to start a new thread for this but I'm only just aware of the possibilities of this pedal and I couldn't find a direct answer in the search engine. What's the difference between the new and older versions of the BMS? How many versions are there? Which ones should I avoid? True Bypass is very important to me and I've read stories about the degradation of the signal when the BMS is in the signal chain but not on. Is this really the case? Your advice and opinions gratefully received! Cheers, Derrick

[quote name='Mike Brooks' post='1012340' date='Nov 4 2010, 05:36 PM']How about this...... [attachment=63049:DSCF1044.JPG] [attachment=63050:DSCF1350.JPG][/quote] Ding Dong!

Oooh I can play in this one..... I have XXX ultra hardcore white bass porn of the highest order from under the counter of the seediest, dirtiest white bass porn shop.... [attachment=62991:IMG_1283.JPG] [attachment=62992:IMG_1289.JPG]

[quote name='lapolpora' post='1001151' date='Oct 26 2010, 02:23 PM']I've just replaced my ER15s with the new HF17s. These sit deeper in your ear and cut out even more than the ERs. Hearing balance still good frequency wise. Also their occlusion properties are better so you're not hearing your own breathing so loudly. These are going to be a better choice if you sing as well. They are cheaper too at £139. I'll be trying them out tonight with my tenor saxophone in a very loud band - so I'll report back again later.....[/quote] Got back from rehearsal and I have to say that I'm preferring the ACS HF17s over the ER15s. Much more comfortable to play in (blasting my guts out on a saxophone). They are much more effective at noise exclusion than the ER15s and ER25s (yes I have them both!), and relieve most of the back pressure in my ear when blowing hard. I don't think the ERs will get much use from now on. Just my experience mind. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the ERs normally, but the HFs do work much better so definitely look into them.

I've just replaced my ER15s with the new HF17s. These sit deeper in your ear and cut out even more than the ERs. Hearing balance still good frequency wise. Also their occlusion properties are better so you're not hearing your own breathing so loudly. These are going to be a better choice if you sing as well. They are cheaper too at £139. I'll be trying them out tonight with my tenor saxophone in a very loud band - so I'll report back again later.....

[quote name='Musicman20' post='997184' date='Oct 22 2010, 03:25 PM']Classic + RH450 - Same 'sound', upgrades if you want them on the RH450. Staccato - Different sound out of the box. MASSIVE low end! Still sounds like the same amp, but with different EQ points and a few other tweaks.[/quote] Cheers!

If I can pose another question to the thread: What's the difference between the Classic 450, Rebel Head450, and Staccato 51? Aside from memory presets and built in tuner etc of the latter two, are they the same amp underneath? Or are the all voiced differently? I'm really more interested in the sound the three amps produce than the extra features. On paper they all look the same.