TimR

[quote name='wishface' timestamp='1390222636' post='2342711'] ... Of course trying stuff out is great, but again you can only try what they have and shops tend to be fronts for a particular brand, whether or not it's any good, and because they are shops you are likely worse off in terms of value for money. [/quote] Shops aren't 'fronts' for a certain brand 'whether or not it's any good' When someone stocks their shop they are often given a minimum level for their account. So someone who wants to sell Yamaha basses for example might have to spend £10k a year with Yamaha in order for Yamaha to agree to open an account and supply instruments. It is obviously more attractive to stock equipment from companies like fender, Yamaha and Warwick who make basses and amps than companies that only make basses. £10k is just a figure I've plucked out of the air, I suspect it's a lot higher and different for each manufacturer. In essence you can't go to fender and open an account and just ask for a red Jazz and a black P, then go to Ibanez and ask for an SR200 in blue.

[quote name='lojo' timestamp='1390153901' post='2342024'] So who would wear the T shirt, the singer or guitarist need to only if they wish to boast, the drummer is happily married and doesn't need to , the bass player to advertise his availability or the keyboard player to stand up for the cause ? [/quote] Clearly the bass player to indicate his self effacing sense of humour and only interest in women who have been initiated (or willingness to be initiated) in the ways of the bass Once initiated they never go back. In my experience

[quote name='Lozz196' timestamp='1390157748' post='2342114'] It`s the increased "fullness/depth" that you get when adding in another cab. Try it by connecting up your amp head and one of your cabs, start playing, then plug the other in, the "size" of the sound should be much bigger, but without any rise in volume. [/quote] You get a doubling of volume below the frequency whose wavelength is four times the distance between the drivers. Or something... Bass frequency coupling.

Surely you just give your customers a time limited wi-fi code that only lasts 30mins when they buy their coffee. I thought that if you break something in a shop the shop keeper can demand you pay the cost value of the item.

30p for a coffee in London sounds like a deal. Don't we already pay for the overheads when we buy a bass anyway. Isn't Saturday afternoon noodling all part of a good music shop atmosphere?

Under the distance selling act, wouldn't people just order online and send them back. How would it work if you want to try 10 basses in the shop? Do you only get the £1 off the bass you buy? You even try wine in a restaurant before you buy it.

Yes. I've been in that situation. Do a googlemap. Think that's ok, only to find traffic makes it a nightmare at that time of evening. Just tell them traffic was more of an issue than you realised and you couldn't commit to regular travel.

We play 'Just Got Paid' by ZZTop. There are a few bars of driven sixteenths where you have to be right on top of the beat or the song drags. Then there are huge sections of unison and close harmony. It's a pig of a song! Just listened to Rush's Counterparts album last night. Again some sections of some songs are sixteenth notes. From Geddy!!!!???

[quote name='blamelouis' timestamp='1389823179' post='2338419'] Part of the reason Sting got The Police back together for the reunion tour was to make amends to Andy and Stewart. The original fee was £150 million split three ways for the reunion BUT when the tour was extended they got an extra £20 million each. So the boys did reportedly did all right . [/quote] You've totally lost me there. What has that got to do with squirrels?

[quote name='Ziphoblat' timestamp='1389818029' post='2338338'] Nail on the head right here. It always amuses me to see people get so fiery about "playing for the song" as if there's no place for having a bit of fun with your instrument. Reeks of insecurity to me. Each to their own though, I suppose everyone has their own goals and objectives with their playing. [/quote] I'm kind of in both camps. It's certainly a well overused phrase. Most bass lines write themselves though. Traditionally, once the melody is written you've got very few options; root, root-fifth, unison, counterpoint, then you've got approach notes to chords. It's why we're bass players and you can spot a guitar player playing bass, we usually pick lines automatically without thinking. Try coming up with an original line that fits a song without using one of the above. It's hard. Well, it is for me

[quote name='arthurhenry' timestamp='1389783291' post='2337770'] Do you think someone decided to film him having previously heard of his antics, or do you think he asked his girlfriend to do it? [/quote] Girlfriend?!

[quote name='xgsjx' timestamp='1389778394' post='2337698'] That's part of what I was trying to find out. How many of us enjoy playing a simple dum dum dum dum for every song & not having anything melodic to play? I don't, but I don't expect everyone to be the same. I have a lot of songs in my repertoire that are simple straight 8, no frills bass parts & I enjoy playing them, but it would bore me to do it in every song. Now I know I mentioned U2 as one of the bands, but Adam does have some very melodic simple basslines that are fun to play too. [/quote] Not in every song. But as mentioned above, hardly any songs are just Dum, Dum, Dum, Dum. If you don't play them right you'll lose the drive and energy. Listen to a computer playing a midi song that hasn't been groove quantised (or whatever they're calling it now). Besides if you're just playing roots it gives you a chance to do other stuff, move around, look at the audience more, sing bv.

Depends whether you're plodding or driving.

[quote name='bassman7755' timestamp='1389698054' post='2336939'] I have a theory that we have limited perceptive bandwidth and so we hear things fundamentally different when were playing and when were are not, and when playing I find that my perception of what I'm playing and my sound is affected by things like if I'm looking at my hands or looking at the speaker cab. As human beings we tend to dramatically over estimate their own ability to objectively perceive and reason. I suggest checking out some of the resources below. ... [/quote] You're right. That's a prime example of why its a waste of time spending hours getting tunes 'exactly like the original'. The audience have already decided what they're going to hear. Many gigs I've not enjoyed and thought I could have played better but everyone else has had a great time. Usually I can trace them back to something that happened previous to the gig. I think the comment above about being able to 'switch it on' is more about being able to zone out all the other rubbish happening in your life and focus on the job you're doing. Many times I've been thinking about what curry to have after the show while playing Mustang Sally. I think they call that phoning it in. Lol.

[quote name='skankdelvar' timestamp='1389636857' post='2336403'] We are the only species with a financial system [i]at present[/i]. My experiment with squirrels is showing great potential. ... [/quote] That's just nuts!

[quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1389600568' post='2335858'] ... [size=6][i]"Here man.. what are yaz airl gannin' on aboot? Wharraloada bollicks!"[/i][/size] [/quote] It's just the usual BC stuff about how life is so unfair. Seems to have spilled out of OT for some reason though.

[quote name='JTUK' timestamp='1389546173' post='2335331'] ... best numbers ... [/quote] This has always been a strange concept for me. What is a 'best number'?

[quote name='flyfisher' timestamp='1389543793' post='2335295'] Do you mean by inheritance of bigger and stronger characteristics or by being given stuff by pure luck? ... [/quote] Pure luck? What is the purpose of having children? On an animalistic side it is so that our genes survive. It's a bit of a bummer to work hard all your life to improve yourself and the chances of survival of your gene pool, if someone's just going to come along and take all that hard work off them and stick them right back down where you started from. Now that would promote a very selfish society and completely destroy any idea of family, not to mention a country that just stagnates. Pass your genes on and run away quickly, your work is done...

I've also been in bands where some numbers have been rehearsed to death, written on the setlist, but somehow the singer has never thought 'the noment was right for them'. We never dropped the songs, they just never got played! What's that about?

I went to a jam session the other week. There were no setlists or tune names written down. It was a bit confusing because no one could remember the names of any tunes they knew. Caught in the headlight moment. Of course walking home tunes just came flooding into my head. If you're confident you'll never have that kind of brain fade you don't need a setlist. I'd have a setlist, even if I played all the right snags but in the wrong order.

[quote name='flyfisher' timestamp='1389536841' post='2335193'] I'd interpret that example as suggesting our time is equally valuable, whatever skills we actually possess and that money is a tool to trade those equally valuable skills because no one can do everything. Of course, all this equality stuff has been tried before and has generally been a dismal failure, which I put down to our innately selfish nature. People don't really want to be equal they want to have more than everyone else, which means that many people lose out but we don't seem to care as long as we're alright. And being among the richest 1% of people on the planet (ever!), we're extremely 'alright'. Shame we're not a bit more honest about it. [/quote] No. I put it down to the fact that we are actually not all equal and the idea of equality is a construct bourne out of idealism. We are all different and we should all be treated differently. Including pay. In nature it usually balances out ok, species evolve and get stronger. And we get bigger and stronger through inheritance!

It's about how we value other people's time. Some people are worth more man hours than others. They're mire valuable. I can fit a new back door. It will take me all day. I'm not great at it but I have the tools and I can do it. My friend can do it in two hours. How many man hours is fitting a back door worth? The problem comes when he needs me to play bass, which he can't do at all. Now if I play bass for two hours in his band, is this the two hours that he spent fitting my door, or two of the six hours I saved when he fitted my door? Do I owe him 4hours? I think I should it's only right, but then he can't play bass at all so I'm saving him hundreds of hours of learning. This is where we remember that money is a tool to be exchanged and not hoarded. My vision would have a limit put on profits, a tax if you like to be paid to the unemployable, but the limit wouldn't be absolute, it would be relative to the number of people you employ. I think it's being proposed in the form of pay ratios between directors and employees. Eg. You cannot pay a director more than 200x the lowest paid employee. I think my idea is better, (of course)

Maybe we're missing the point here. A musician has two choices. He either sells his record to one person for a couple of thousand pounds who then packages and sells it to others, or he waits to see how many units he sells and makes money that way. He takes the gamble and is rewarded. The chair designer designs the chair but usually someone else takes the risk. They buy the design off him and build the factory and employ the workers and sit back and watch the profits roll in. Once the factory is paid for and the original design what should he do? Has Sting really just written and performed a tune and sat back and waited? Has he promoted it by going round the world and attending interviews and playing stadiums? Has he had to stand in a TV studio miming? The idea of copyright is to protect the interests of someone whose creativity is worth more than the actual physical product. That creativity is a difficult thing to put a value on based on 'human endeavour' as there is an unidentifiable quality in it other than pure hard work. If it was something we could all do given the same timescale we wouldn't need Sting and we would just do it ourselves

[quote name='flyfisher' timestamp='1389477072' post='2334683'] Continuing the 'get paid for the actual work' theme, the writer has already been paid for his song, after which it becomes public domain (yeah, I know, contentious). The covers band is being paid for their performance, not for the song. I'm warming to Dad's theme. After all, the concept of royalties is a fairly recent thing isn't it? It's just a made up convention enabled by recording technology - certainly a nice little earner if you can get away with it, but that's not the same as genuine fairness. [/quote] Copyright has been around since the 18th century. It's not a concept dreamed up by the recording industry. We use it to reward people's creativity and encourage them to create more. Sting has proved his creativity is more valued than mine.

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1389474383' post='2334639'] Yes. Strictly speaking, some venues require a set list which needs to be sent to the PRS. There are various different public performance tariffs and pricing issues to be taken into consideration. [url="http://www.prsformusic.com/users/businessesandliveevents/livevenuesevents/concertvenues/Pages/concertvenues.aspx"]http://www.prsformus...certvenues.aspx[/url] [/quote] Since most of us play in pubs it's 3.11 here: http://www.prsformusic.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PPS%20Tariffs/P-2013-10%20Tariff.pdf