Beedster

I think my Snoop just Lioneled, smells like a Frank in here 😕

Too close to the truth 😀

Which reminds me of the less well known Mexican Beatles John, Paul, George, and Gringo 😀

I’ve had far too many JJs in the Ringo and I really need a Geddy 👀

Geddy is going to stick I suspect 😀

Trick is the slang has to lead/suggest the word in replaces, so ‘Jethro’ immediately suggests Tull so ‘Jeez the TV is a bit Jethro today’ shouts Dull. Not many lionels, leos or jethros out there hence they work better than many others, at least among people who’ve heard of them 👍

And of course ‘Lionels’ as in flairs 👍

What a complete Ravi. Yep, that works 👍

Absolutely, I had the same the first time I ran Nina Simone through my tube hifi amp and Tannoys, blew me away how in the room it all sounded 👍

Ahah

You might have to run that by me again mate 🤣

So far we have (and I'be modified a couple to maintain rhyming slang tradition) A David Lee = a cough A Leo = An all dayer A Postman = a hat A Ruby/Pauline = a curry Barry = shite A Bush = a mate A Stanley = a lark Jonnie B = good Pete = wrong A Gary = ............. A Nathan = a Priest A Miles = A c**t A Peter = a Book A Kilmister = a Jemmy Jaco = Notorious A Gail Anne - A horse A Gordon = a Fling A Chris = a Choir To Pink = a To avoid JJ = Ale Frank = Cilla = To Stevie = To chunder The Kids From = The shame Plus a couple I've not quite worked out yet but it's early Good work so far folks

Inspired by the glorious....... I need some cheering up around this weekend so how about we find some now rhyming slang? Obvious examples: "I'm so bloody Hank I could eat a Greggs" (Hank Marvin = starvin'), or "We're going to the Duke of York for a Leo " (Leo Sayer = all dayer as opposed to a Felix = Felix Lighter = all nighter). Upper respiratory tract infection resulting in regular expulsion of air from the throat = a David Lee Roth (shortened to a David Lee in the traditional rhyming slang protocol) Must be musicians or bands, and the more apt the better, let's face it Hank Marvin always looked a little underfed....

Notorious 90's headwear thieves Take Hat

Slightly odorous Nashville/country pop lass Taylor Wift

High pitched warbling from Whiney Houston

Upper class traditional cooking from Lady Aga

Deceptive 60's West Coast siblings The Lying Burrito Brothers

US rapper plagiarises UFO Dr Dr

Beer loving bassist Boosy Collins

Cerebral 80's metal from Axon

Yes 👍 But all joking aside, I was like a kid in a sweet store when I first used amps - both bass and hifi - that could do decent lows and highs, largely as the result of having had to endure 15-20 years of inarticulate and undefined mids associated with poor quality audio.

In fact, perhaps in evolutionary terms the excessive highs and lows of a scooped audio system are shouting "Hey look what I can do" in the same way as a peacock extending his feathers, no use in real terms whatsoever, but critical in propagating his DNA

i think it's the same as hifi, there's a tendency among consumers to want to hear what are - in pure audio signal terms - excessive lows and excessive highs as a mark of the quality of the system. This I suspect is on the basis that the absence of these lows and highs was often a mark of the absence of quality, that is lower quality audio systems were very mid heavy. There's a huge difference between a system being mid-heavy because of poor quality components that restrict bass and treble response and being mid heavy as the result of accurate reproduction of the original signal, but I suspect that for many of us we still find that scoop pleasing for these reasons despite the fact that it's rarely a useable tone and distorts the sound of the instrument significantly. While I got there with bass quite quickly, usually as the result of drummers saying they needed more mids to hear me, it took me year to stop scooping hifi on this basis, in part because it also required that I had a good enough audio system to allow a mid-heavy signal to sound good to my ear. There's a evolutionary argument also (potentially dubious); narrow frequency responses are associated with limited environmental resources. In the environment in which we evolved a wide range of sounds from the lowest produced by large animals to the highest produce by the smallest indicated a diverse and therefore resource-rich natural environment. The absence of these often indicated the absence of life or the presence of predators, while lots of mids indicated insects etc. Lots of mids (which by the way are often used to create tension in movies etc), are apparently not appealing to our brains (keep in mind I did say potentially dubious above). So, perhaps scoop is to audio what sugar and salt are to food; for reasons tied into the way our brains are wired either through learning or evolution, we tend to buy more of the product the more it contains, consciously or otherwise?