All fair points, and there's the argument that wealthy collectors inflate the prices of these instruments beyond the reach of musicians which I get. But if these vintage examples were significantly better instruments that those available to contemporary musicians I think the argument would be stronger. The thing is, they really aren't, or at least they really aren't in the same way as a 18th century Italian violin potentially is better than those made today, which is a a function of the materials, aging, and craftsmanship. I had a Squier CV 50s Precision that frankly was about 90% of my old '55. OK, the latter had mojo by the tonne, but the mojo a musician should really care about is in their brain and their fingers. not in the paintwork of their instrument