Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Beedster

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    13,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Everything posted by Beedster

  1. Absolutely Steve, if OP had been happy to courier it would already be sitting at my place 🙂
  2. I’d still like go see the front PUP rout….
  3. That made me very happy 👍
  4. Might be a modified Fender body of course?
  5. No, it's rounded like some of the Jap basses of the 70's/80's. Never seen a Fender with those?
  6. Photos aren't great but the screwheads suggest that neck's been on and off the bass a few times, which could mean anything of course, but provides little reason for him to argue that removing the neck to prove the date stamp could damage the original screws/threads etc (the excuse I was given a few years back). Anyway, it's all a shot in the dark on the evidence provided. He doesn't seem keen to give any more details than he has or book inspections (he added extra information to the thread that simply repeated the previous details). He might not really know himself if it's truly a '62, would be the first guy to won and play an instrument for years only to find they were sold a ringer in 1978. Either way, I get the sense he's trying to keep people interested - and potentially start an eBay bidding war - without any bidders actually knowing what they're bidding on? There's a bid of £2800 on it at present which is perhaps a nice final price if it's a real - albeit far from original - '62, but a hell of a lot of cash for fugazi. Interested to see how this one pans out 🤫
  7. Mighty Mite necks are a whole lot better proportioned that that fugly thing, that looks like one of the rather cheap (£30) items that are sold from China via eBay. I've got one (not on purpose), it's not a bad neck for £30, but it has that same rather plump headstock
  8. Anyone else see Scooby Doo 😆
  9. Not on a Precision 👍
  10. Top of headstock is also oversized
  11. I had a few bows on trial a while back and despite playing bows that retailed at over £1500 preferred one at a quarter of that price, or at least couldn't hear or feel a difference between the two that would warrant my paying four times more than I did
  12. ‘Small’… 🤔
  13. A better account ..... I will be posting some pics of some big boxes by Mesa among others tomorrow
  14. indeed
  15. Parcel Monkey lost my 1516, as I said at the time, not unlike losing a planet 😆
  16. Certainly lighter Marc 👍
  17. This is the look I aim for when gigging.... Given this is how I currently look.... ....I also have to do a lot of cosmetic work ahead of gigs 👍
  18. But wow, if you do have the problem this things really does solve it. Of the two, I kinda preferred the SLB-100 to play, the the 200 is so much easier to get from A-B and IIRC also sounded a little more authentic (while the 100 was very much a silent practice instrument, I got the sense that Yamaha had a keen eye on gigging with the 200). Beautiful instrument and hard to come by these days 👍
  19. Ah yes, a common thing 👍
  20. How is that solo project going Paul
  21. Mmm, I suspect they'd be the best judge of that though, if business is working despite the iffy tech, why change the tech (hell, they get free advertising on BC in threads such as this every three months because of it)?
  22. .... and don't share your sense of humour
×
×
  • Create New...