Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Beedster

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    13,113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Everything posted by Beedster

  1. Can't find any in the UK, might be forced to make my own. Please save me and my family the pain Something like this.....
  2. This is certainly a nice amp and probably worth a lot more than I'm selling it for, I got lucky and bought it from a studio owner local to me for £300 in an eBay auction and it's clearly had little use (I added £50 for the rack case and postage) 👍
  3. Sorry to hear about your health problems @mckendrick, beautiful instrument 👍
  4. Well, in the seller's defence, had they put it in the right place they would have really struggled to access the strings at all given the size of that bridge cover
  5. I love the bass line in Wordy Rappinghood, utterly iconic 👍
  6. These amps predate Markbass, MdV partnered with EBMM in the mid-late 90s on these. You cab certainly see in them some innovation later adopted by Markbass in for example the vintage character circuitry, which is very nicely done 👍
  7. Well unless someone buys this today it's going into the workshop and emerging in a few month's time as the Beedster Charlie Tumahai Sig Bass, with a nice aged blonde finish. I remember seeing BBD on OGWT and thinking 'that's not the standard Telebass that you see here" (given the number of bands that used a blonde Telebass on OGWT I suspect it was a house instrument), but it always looked like a very cool bass. Anyone up for a Be Bop Deluxe Tribute act?
  8. Hang on a second..... Adam Clayton Neil Tennant Bet you've never seen them in the same place?
  9. It's just so boring to look at, how many more times are Fender going to use the same old box "Got any of those same old wooden boxes we put all our guitar and bass combos in Chad?" "There's about 10,000 out the back Brad" "Oh man, how we goon shift those flipers Chad?" "We could always use 'The Fender Algorithm' Brad" "What you mean make the same item but call it something different, or say it came from the Custom Shop (sniggers) Chad" "Yes, but we'll use the even better and updated algorithm, make more money still if we can find a well past their best rock star to allow us to call it their Custom Shop Signature Amp Brad" "Ah, I can see why you're Worldwide Head of Horizon Scanning and Innovation at Fender Musical Instruments Corps Chad"
  10. I've probably had more PMs about this body than about any item I've ever listed here, but yes, still available 👍
  11. Thanks for the above guys, I think the reality is that if I go the D-style route they'll go in and stay in, I'll always have the option of using the XLRs as the DB25/XLRs are switchable. Not fixed in this as a solution yet but it's looking the best compromise all around at present 👍
  12. BTW, @Dad3353I hesitate to ask having just looked at some prices, but what do you consider constitutes a well manufactured DB25?
  13. Thanks @Dad3353, just checking I'm not missing anything in assuming that by taking the DB25 I/Ps from a female XLR patch-bay and send the DB25 O/Ps to a male equivalent gets around the flexibility problem?
  14. Thanks @BigRedX, thought so, seems that using DB25s for both in and out might save me a bit of cable mess, keeping an 8 x XLR input patchbay on he front of the rack unit and a 8 x XLR output on the back I get your point re the channels, that could have tripped me up 👍
  15. I've been using XLRs so long that to use anything else just feels odd
  16. Thanks @WinterMute, I found the DB25 schematic for the O/P on my UAD so I assume this is also balanced?
  17. Thanks @WinterMute, much appreciated, it's only just occurred to me that the most obvious way of reducing cable problems is to un the front patch-bay to the DB25 input on the UAD rather than to the separate XLR ins, is tyere any reason why this is not a good idea (would I expect better quality with XLR for example)?
  18. Folks, I'm trying to rationalise my recording setup at present, I'm using a temporary 'studio' that is I suspect not entirely free of damp so have installed my UAD and SSL devices in a portable (if rather large) rack unit that I move between house and studio, the added bonus of which is that I can work on editing/production in the house also. I have an 8-channel patch bay on the front allowing easy access to the inputs on the back of the UAD. The problem is that having already been faced with a sea of XLR cables in a relatively small case, I now need to access two channels of an 8-output DB25 output meaning even more cables and as far as I can tell 6 'spare' XLRs in the box running out of the back of the DB25. There seem to be two options, firstly take the DB25 apart and disconnect/remove the spare XLR cables (which even if it's easy to do in terms of the mechanics might be risky in terms of identifying which pins connects to which channel), or install a second and larger patch bay on the back that would significantly tidy things up, and which strikes me as the preferable option. This would mean that mic inputs into the UAD would pass through two patch bays and a total of 6 XLRs before getting to the preamps. Now I'm guessing the above is as clear as mud, but thoughts welcome, I'll try and take some photos that might simplify stuff a little, but the main question relates to the wisdom of passing audio through multiple plugs/cables/patch bays. I've a good idea who'll likely be responding with their expertise and experience so thanks in advance 👍
×
×
  • Create New...