Jump to content
Why become a member? Γ—

Beedster

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    13,116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Everything posted by Beedster

  1. Thanks @WinterMute, much appreciated, it's only just occurred to me that the most obvious way of reducing cable problems is to un the front patch-bay to the DB25 input on the UAD rather than to the separate XLR ins, is tyere any reason why this is not a good idea (would I expect better quality with XLR for example)?
  2. Folks, I'm trying to rationalise my recording setup at present, I'm using a temporary 'studio' that is I suspect not entirely free of damp so have installed my UAD and SSL devices in a portable (if rather large) rack unit that I move between house and studio, the added bonus of which is that I can work on editing/production in the house also. I have an 8-channel patch bay on the front allowing easy access to the inputs on the back of the UAD. The problem is that having already been faced with a sea of XLR cables in a relatively small case, I now need to access two channels of an 8-output DB25 output meaning even more cables and as far as I can tell 6 'spare' XLRs in the box running out of the back of the DB25. There seem to be two options, firstly take the DB25 apart and disconnect/remove the spare XLR cables (which even if it's easy to do in terms of the mechanics might be risky in terms of identifying which pins connects to which channel), or install a second and larger patch bay on the back that would significantly tidy things up, and which strikes me as the preferable option. This would mean that mic inputs into the UAD would pass through two patch bays and a total of 6 XLRs before getting to the preamps. Now I'm guessing the above is as clear as mud, but thoughts welcome, I'll try and take some photos that might simplify stuff a little, but the main question relates to the wisdom of passing audio through multiple plugs/cables/patch bays. I've a good idea who'll likely be responding with their expertise and experience so thanks in advance πŸ‘
  3. He was 100% sarcastic which is why I warmed to John πŸ‘
  4. in fact I’m thinking if buying an Ibanez SRAS7 and uploading a regular Masterclass
  5. It’s the new normal, the only thing worse than having stinky poo content on the internet is not having stinky poo content on the internet πŸ‘
  6. That's a fine looking collection mate πŸ‘
  7. Well if it doesn't work out and you fancied flogging me the footswitch @MrDinsdale.........
  8. Let's hope it was a commission sale and not an instrument they took in PX πŸ€”
  9. Always wanted one, never one around when I had the cash
  10. I don't think they do mate, yes there's certainly a lot of it, but there's other stuff also. But I struggle to find solo fretless that doesn't have that tone. I even listened to a demo of a beautiful acoustic fretless a few weeks back and, you guessed it, Jaco Very happy to be proved wrong
  11. First time I played my 4003 FL live - the first track of a small gig playing Whole Lotta Love - the feeling of pure joy as I kicked in with THAT bassline wasn't just me, the whole band and some of the audience got it as well. For me it's a sound that just works on some tracks and not on others, I'd certainly have another Ric FL if one came up πŸ‘
  12. I'm a big fan of fretless in ensemble playing, but why do nearly all fretless soloists appear to produce the same nasal and vibrato-rich tone, almost irrespective of instrument and genre (dare I say the J word.....)?
  13. In my experience having owned four, Rics are like girlfriends, always a really good reason why we got together and always an equally good reason why it didn't work out..... Spent my whole life dating Rics, Wals, married a Precision πŸ‘
  14. Yes, te Fender Custom Shop Jaco Pastorius was similarly a rip off, I lifted it out of its case with the reverence that it undoubtedly deserved, plugged i in to my B-15 and started playing, and it sounded like some fecking idiot from Kent was playing it
  15. There is indeed @Muppet And yes, in my limited experience with it, it's appears very well voiced, one of those units on which pretty much all the settings sound musical one way or another πŸ‘
  16. 10kgs or very close (can't speak to the accuracy of the digital scales). That's naked. i.e., out of the rack case. Oddly it felt heavier πŸ€”
  17. The bass playing world would be far less rich without Rickenbackers πŸ‘
  18. I found a link on Talkbass that states 24lbs, I'll confirm tonight πŸ‘
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...