wateroftyne

[quote name='musicbassman' timestamp='1507822518' post='3388228'] Yup, it sounds 'wrong' to me also - but hey - is this really important? [/quote] Not really. But I'm intrigued that it seems to be a deliberate note choice, rather than a flub.

[quote name='The Jaywalker' timestamp='1507818961' post='3388194'] There's zero issue with playing a major 6th over a minor chord. It's absolutely normal. Lots more minor scales out there than Natural Minor/Aeolian ;-) [/quote] Gah.. it sounds so wishy-washy to my ears. I actually think he should have pedaled the root on the middle eight. It would have sounded so much better, and maybe the song might have been more of a commercial success.

[quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1507813599' post='3388141'] Duck Dunn just about rescues crashing into the first chorus on Sam and Dave's Soul Man. If the groove was good then the mistakes stayed. Time and tape was expensive back then and most bass lines "disappeared" when you played the record on your Dansette or listened to it on the car radio. [/quote] Absolutely.. it's intriguing he kept it for the BB2000 recording, though. He must have been pretty convinced by it.

[quote name='hiram.k.hackenbacker' timestamp='1507812525' post='3388134'] If it's the note I think it is, doesn't he repeat it again afterwards? Still sounds fine to me though. [/quote] He does - it sounds wrong both times to me. ha ha.

[quote name='mikel' timestamp='1507811658' post='3388122'] Was Phil Spector not brought in at the last minute to "Save" the recordings from those sessions? I believe he put all the strings and suchlike on after the band sessions were over. Lennon, for one, was less than happy with the finished album because of all the add ons. They had, to all intents, split by then anyway so I doubt they were particularly bothered. [/quote] Nah, it was McCartney who objected, and tried to block its release. That why let It Be... Naked came along later.

[quote name='hiram.k.hackenbacker' timestamp='1507810874' post='3388107'] Is this at exactly 1m10s? [/quote] No - 1m22s. I suggested listening from a bit earlier to get some context.

[quote name='Jus Lukin' timestamp='1507810454' post='3388101'] I hear it- the 'sixth' step of the first chord of the mid 8 is played major, but 'ought' to be minor, right? Or to put it more simply, the highest note of the phrase on that chord should be a semi-tone lower. I'm saying this without a bass in my hands to check, but that's how it sounds to me. [/quote] ^^^ exactly!

Ahh.. it's jarring to me. I've just checked and he does it on the original, too. It must just be me..

[quote name='Hobbayne' timestamp='1507808723' post='3388080'] If you want a bass line where the player is unsure of the chords and hits repeatedly bum notes, have a listen to The Beatles' 'Long & Winding Road.' [/quote] *shudder*

Listen to this from about 1m10s. When it shifts into the middle eight, it goes minor, but Duck cracks on with the usual line. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGbj4u-6c0A Whaddya fink? Of course it's Duck, so I'm happy to accept that he's right, and everyone else is wrong :-)

Sounds OK to me..?

Those HB Teles are - IMO - pretty terrible, tonally. Whether the bridge pup is enough to rescue it is something you'll have to find out for yourself...

[quote name='lojo' timestamp='1507728465' post='3387540'] I'd play / buy one happily and just call it a limelight , my questions more along the lines of aren't Limelight risking a lawsuit or do they have this covered somehow ? [/quote] I guess they are, but I also assume they know how to stay above the water.

I imagine people play them, like them, and when they're asked about it take mischievous pride in saying 'It's not actually a real Fender...' Some people out there might not agree with the principle, but that's between them and their wallet.

[quote name='dood' timestamp='1507133966' post='3383556'] Nobody mention the Accugroove debacle regarding the TRI210L.. [/quote] Yeah... no doubt this is a different thing entirely, but any future attempt at this was bound to be tarnished by the stench of the Accuswitch.

Beautiful! But yeah, with that board & logo, it’s more early 70s than ‘62 :-)

[quote name='stingrayPete1977' timestamp='1507569396' post='3386411'] Really? You've not mentioned it [/quote] Oh, you hadn't heard? In that case I shall endeavour to mention it more...

[quote name='JapanAxe' timestamp='1507566717' post='3386393'] I seem to recall molan (of this parish) remarking that the TH500 used the same Class D power stage as the allegedly 900W Streamliner! [/quote] The modules in pretty much all these amps are much of a muchness, just with tweaks here and there. I realised I didn't like the core behaviour, so I bailed on them a while ago.

Is there a possibility that he's just not cut out for this music lark?

More flats fun! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObRuRxFNxGY

Me too. It's a terrible name, though. It reminds me the autobiography of that hairy beardy bloke.

'Tis indeed a B...

Bravewood charge a fortune for body relic'ing like that.

Rounds back on again... it's a beaut :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STr8CN1ExzE

Amazed that didn't go, TBH.