wateroftyne

Dad3353 - I don't understand your argument. Generally speaking, while a musician is recording, they're investing money, and probably not getting paid during the process. The reason being is that they're making an investment in that recording, which will hopefully generate some income. That's not an unreasonable concept.

Just lern 2 spell. Spell checquers r a CRUTCSH.

As for the PJ.. I'm a P guy, but I've got a fair bit of work with a function band who do some tunes that cry out for bridge pickup burp. My Maruszczyk PJ has Haussel pickups which are specifically matched - I run it as a P most of the time, but the J comes in handy for those tunes. I rarely run the P & J pups wide open. It's just not my thing.

[quote name='krispn' timestamp='1436338367' post='2817118'] Spelling error - it's craic [/quote] It originated as 'crack' in Northern England and Scotland. The Irish borrowed it, and it became 'craic' in the 70s. It then made its way in Gaelic form back to the UK. It's still 'crack' around our way. Just sayin'.

[quote name='ambient' timestamp='1436314532' post='2817069'] Silly question time, but how would the goings on in Calais be holding up the parcels that are in Koln ? [/quote] Presumably they're being held at the depot 'cos there's no point in them going further...

They've just uploaded a vid of a shortscale Elwood... [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szGSXQt5xu4[/media]

[quote name='JoeEvans' timestamp='1436213605' post='2816112'] Yes - I wouldn't have bought the Air myself, but it's very nice nonetheless... Boots up more or less instantly (solid state HD) and does everything very fast and easily while also being very small and light. And the Dell was like that straight from the box. I fiddled about a bit trying to work out if there was anything actually wrong with it (as did the IT guy at work) but didn't really get anywhere. It's entirely possible that there is some reason for the slowness beyond it just being a bit crap, but it has certainly put me off Dells. [/quote] Yup. I'm generally a PC person, but I picket up a fairly new Macbook Air off Gumtree for a great price for Mrs. WoT and it's lovely. Such a tidy bit of kit. I went with my Dell XPS 'cos I can't abide the floppy plastic tat that most other PC laptops seem to consist of. It's solid and well-built, but.. it's just flaky. And that's a shame :-(

[quote name='landwomble' timestamp='1436204121' post='2815962'] Dell UK outlet. Find yourself a nice ultrabook at half price. [/quote] I picked up an XPS 15 via this route a couple of months ago. It's a lovely laptop, but it has a few (apparently known) issues that are proving difficult to get resolved. As it stands, as much as I'd like to, I can't recommend 'em.

[quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1436192161' post='2815777'] No lessons. . . . but search YouTube for Stax, Chess, Pye International and Checker records. They are all great songs and pretty easy to pick up. [/quote] Yep.. it's all there in the songs. Listen and learn.

The deal isn't done until goods & money has changed hands. Always assume there's a chance it could go wrong at any point before then, and you'll never be disappointed.

[url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/263987-sandberg-new-tm-vm-body-styling-not-as-good"]Here's a previous thread on 'em...[/url]

Maybe have a chat with Limelight too...

PM me the link...

I'm keen to see what Alex comes up with, too. He seems to have a pretty good understanding of what I've been hearing whenever I've played through micros...

[quote name='bassman7755' timestamp='1435667156' post='2811134'] The RH450 episode is an interesting one because before that famous review where they tested the power output rigorously and found it was 240 watts or whatever and had a bit of a vicious HPF, the amp was getting rave writeups my most people I saw posting about it at the time. [/quote] Apart from me... after the novelty of having a small amp with all those bells and whistles and tube amp simulation wore off. Psychology, you see? Expectations altered my perception

[quote name='Nicko' timestamp='1435666686' post='2811120'] If you are a proper professional rather than a paid amateur I'd agree, but as an amateur you don't need to volunteer "I play paid gigs" information unless they specifically ask. My insurance covers the instruments - that was confirmed. It covers them when they're out of the house - that's also confirmed. I'd suggest the very nature of the insured articles and their cover outside of the house would entail antisocial hours. In a similar way - as an amateur - I don't insure my car for travel to and from work to cover getting to the rehearsal studio or the odd gig I play even though the hours are antisocial. [/quote] If you're getting paid for it - no matter how much - the game changes. Of course, you could tell the insurance company you were doing the gig for nowt, but that's lying. And they don't like that....

[quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1435663940' post='2811072'] These days I'm playing through one of the best sounding rigs I've owned. I'm running an Aguilar TH500 through a Berg CN212. But hold on. . . that's the worst of all worlds according to some people. So how come is it a universally acclaimed pairing for volume and tone? I wonder how that can be if D class amps and neo cabs are as bad a some say. The OP was asking for info. I guess he's got his answer. Ultimately he has to make up his own mind based on what [i]he[/i] hears. [/quote] Yep, it's a polarising subject.

To anyone who thinks they're covered on their home insurance, I urge you to give 'em a bell to check. Otherwise you might be in for a nasty shock...

Hmm.. I was an early Acoustic Image adopter (for the UK at least) and I recall that having the same lack of backbone that I've experienced with the other heads I've used. The TC was - IMO - dreadful (and I'm sure that uses a B&O derivative?). Markbass I've never got on with, and the only Aguilar head I've used was the AG500 which I liked immediately. but then again it has a lump'o'iron power supply even though it's class D.

[quote name='Passinwind' timestamp='1435427503' post='2808730'] Not all bass amp makers doing uber-lightweight small heads use the same ICE modules either though (although many do), and even among the ones who do, IME they don't all sound the same. So my take is that implementation is everything, same as it ever was. I didn't really like very many old school amps back when they were contemporary, don't really like too many new ones either. Yet I sound just like me through just about anything. Doesn't keep me from still trying to improve the sound reinforcement aspect though -- maybe I'll get it right in the next forty years! [/quote] I was under the impression most of the amps we're discussing here use a similar variant of the B&O module. They may not all sound the same, by they (i.e. the ones I've tried) seem to have a common characteristic that I don't get on with.

[quote name='Reverend' timestamp='1435399919' post='2808397'] Seeing as almost all of the major players in live sound reinforcement are producing insanely powerful and efficient Class D solutions now (look at the d&b web site - everything is class D), I think a lot of people are spouting a little bit of misinformed prejudice against Class D amplifiers. There's a whole lot more to a bass amp than just the power amp section - the preamp design, the EQ, the power supply etc. All of these things are important, and if all of these are designed well there's no reason why a Class D can't perform as well as a class A/B. I really think people are having rose tinted... er... ear syndrome when it comes to the amps of yesteryear. A few years ago not a single person was extolling the virtues of their 'trusy Trace AH600SMX'. Now it seems that because of all this new Class D muck, they and other A/Bs are suddenly the greatest amp ever designed. Remember what you are comparing - lots of people are comparing say the GK MB500 - a £450 amp against top of the range Trace gear from the 90s which cost £1K plus, with the best quality pre-amps, power sections and PSUs that money could buy. Hardly a fair comparison! If you whack your bass through a nice pre-amp into one of the new top of the range Crown or d&b Class Ds power amps, I hardly think you are going to be 'lacking heft'. They are ridiculously good! [/quote] I don't think the Crown or D&B stuff uses the same ICEPower module as the lightweight heads being discussed here. Until that changes, I think there's a lot of truth being spoken here.

Mesa Walkabout. Ideal for those who want a small-ish head with a proper amp in it.

[quote name='Musicman20' timestamp='1435241215' post='2806890'] I doubt it matters but I think they are covering themselves legally. [/quote] I suspect it's likely to be more of their 'creative marketing'.

I'm guessing it's neither, and it's just a limitation of the software.

[quote name='Bass Culture' timestamp='1435228343' post='2806668'] This would be called 'Marketing' by anyone else and generally speaking anyone who's got anything to sell does it - to a greater or lesser extent. Probably all manufacturers of bass gear are in the habit of emphasising the most attractive, saleable, differentiating or - rarely - [i]unique[/i] characteristics of their product(s). At the end of the day it's either loud (or loud enough) or its not. Given the reams of threads and comments on this subject I still can't remember reading anyone who's said their particular RH series amp wasn't loud enough for them or that they somehow perceived it to be quieter when they caught up with the 'science' that informs the claims for the higher wattage output. It's been said before that watts and decibels/volume are not the same thing. Compare 150w of any Trace head made to Ashdown's 500w Superfly, for example. One is most certainly [i]louder[/i] than the other and it isn't the one with the higher claimed output. Does that mean the Superfly wasn't genuinely putting out 500w in the first place or that there was something about the management of that 500w that meant it didn't play as loud as 150 watts of Trace? Personally, no idea. Don't know, don't really care, but I cant remember quite the same level of hoo-ha accompanying that apparent anomaly. Now, full disclosure: I own an RH750 myself. It sounds great, has some really useful features and plays considerably louder than I'll ever need for my purposes. That's good enough for me. [/quote] I know this same discussion keeps coming around every few months. FWIW, I agree with chris_b that TC have been disingenuous at best. I sold mine before the wattage 'scandal' came to light, because IMO it just sounded weak. If I had to try and describe it, I'd say the power management system bumps up the loudness at the expense of the dynamics. SImilarly, my car stereo is loud, but dynamically it's as flat as anything. It probably uses the same power section. ha ha. I mentioned on here recently that after spending a few years in a class-D wasteland using amps that [i]do[/i] use the same power section, I realised that whenever I use an amp with a lump of iron in it, I just don't have to turn it up so loud. The dynamics are just [i]there[/i] and I don't have to use more volume to try and compensate. Anyway, plenty of people use the RH450 / RH750 and love 'em. So it's all a moot point.