To those who disagree with these basses on moral grounds, I have two questions:
1 ) How much money do they think Fender lose every time one of these basses changes hands?
2 ) Have they every downloaded an MP3 or copied a CD illegally, depriving the creator of a little bit of income?
FWIW, I have no argument with people who don't get relic'ing, and and agree entirely that Fender have every right to protect their trademark. And obviously these basses should NEVER be passed off as the real thing (but if, as some people suggest, it's a £150 bitsa attacked by a belt sander, that shouldn't be possible anyway).