Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Sibob

Moderator
  • Posts

    8,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sibob

  1. [quote name='Shambo' post='741012' date='Feb 10 2010, 02:10 PM']Don't the Mexican 70's re-issues have a bullet truss rod on the headstock? I'm squinting at his picture and I can't see one. [/quote] Yeah and I don't think they have thumbrests either, or 4 bolt necks!? Could be interesting, although the neck looks a bit pasty in the neckplate photo Si
  2. Ah ok, I hadn't looked very close at it! Time for Dood to get the ruler out from the underwear draw! Si
  3. If they did, it would be on the D & G strings instead wouldn't it!? Si
  4. Yup, 121mm, 1985 Japanese Squier Precision Si
  5. [quote name='thunderbird13' post='740661' date='Feb 10 2010, 09:28 AM']Well I looked at all the advice here and took decided that I all I wanted to do was play Hawkwind and I wasnt that fussed about playing original material. So last night I met up with the guitarist to tell him this. However I wasn’t quite prepared for his reaction. From what I can remember the conversation went something like Me - I’m sorry mate but I’m just not into the stuff your doing now and all I really want is to play Hawkwind Him – I see where your coming from but I cant play anymore Hawkwind as we already play it Me – eh ? Him – well we have another bass player who we play with and we gig Hawkwind stuff with him instead Me – So what was I in the band for Him – well the other bassist and the drummer argue a lot so it’s better to keep them apart when we rehearse ! So it was all bit smoke and mirrors and I wasn’t even in the band I thought I was in all along [/quote] Wow, that's a real M. Night Shyamalan ending to the thread lol Si
  6. [quote name='The Bass Doc' post='740728' date='Feb 10 2010, 10:35 AM']More winding on the post would help. If you've already cut it short, try forcing down what wrap you have and hold it down as you re-tighten up to tension.[/quote] +1 If it's a Fender style headstock (4-in-a-line), the A string doesn't have the benefit of being right next to the nut like the E string for angle over the nut, nor the benefit of a string-tree like the D & G strings. So by giving it a little bit more winding than you'd give the other strings, you allow the string to sit lower on the tuner, giving a tighter and therefore more tensioned angle over the nut. Si
  7. The problem seems to be when people assume that ordering on their website is the direct responsibility of the people at the shop. Mark @ GAK as apologised many times for the website and always advocates calling him directly! Si
  8. Hey all I've started playing for a live HipHop band called 'Shallow & The Deep' www.myspace.com/shallowandthedeep We've got an Emergenza gig (I know, con merchants) at the Purple Turtle in Camden on Tuesday the 16th Feb. If you're in the area, come down and say Hi, it's a horrible battle of the bands type thing that's based on show of hands. I'm not so bothered about all that as it's my first gig, but would be good to try and get some people down! Cheers all Si
  9. [quote name='ped' post='737057' date='Feb 6 2010, 11:56 AM']Me too Si, should be fun. I'm moving very soon so will be in touch for a 'photoshoot'!![/quote] Definitely mate, looking forward to it! My Shuker/Parts Jazz is back and working now, so I have a couple of sub-groups to shoot. The Triplets: All sunburst/rosewood/tort - MIA Jazz 4, MIA Jazz 5, 1973 Jazz The Twins: Black on black/Maple Jazz & black on black/Rosewood Precision Shout me when you're settled Si
  10. Wow, a year and 4 months is it!? Probably cos he fixed my Jazz neck! lol Looking forward to seeing it Si
  11. [quote name='silddx' post='737440' date='Feb 6 2010, 05:53 PM']Ah, I anticipated this you see An electric guitar is an entirely different beast and occupies so much more sonic space, core tone in a leccy guitar is infinitely more important than for a leccy bass.[/quote] Si
  12. Yeah, they're very coarse....precisely the reason I don't like them at all! Si
  13. [quote name='JTUK' post='737608' date='Feb 6 2010, 08:53 PM']In reply to the original title... I think core tone on a bass itself is paramount.. haven't read the interim, but I think it is far easier to embellish a sound than to repair and build it.. If a bass didn't have a good tone, first off, it stays in the shop..[/quote] Yup Si
  14. [quote name='silddx' post='737588' date='Feb 6 2010, 08:25 PM']Zappa gave him pretty much free reign on most things. In fact the horn section often complained bitterly to Zappa that Thunes wasn't supporting their solos enough. Zappa got pissed off with them in the end and apparently loved what Thunes did with his music.[/quote] Ah ok cool! My mate did lend me Zappa's auto-biography, I should get round to reading it Si
  15. [quote name='silddx' post='737571' date='Feb 6 2010, 08:02 PM']One more thing about Scott Thunes, he will always react to claims of his genius that everything he did was at an intermediate level and that any decent bassist could do what he did. He will shout at you and give contradictory evidence most of the time if you tell him he's a genius.[/quote] I only know of his work with Zappa (what else did he do?), and from what I gather, Zappa wrote everything out, and so I can see that Thunes would be embarrassed that people treat him as a genius when he's only really doing what any session/pit musician does nightly. I think Thomas Haake from Meshuggah has a similar outlook, everything lauds him as an amazing drummer, which he is technically, but all he's doing by his own admission, is recreating drum tracks that were often written on computer. Si
  16. Perhaps the 'tone' arguement is indeed used by some to rationlise expensive purchases, I couldn't say. I've paid over £1000 for a bass twice in my life. One was my EUB that I know longer have, and the second was my 1973 Jazz. I love the '73 but it often makes way for my '03 MIA S1 Jazz that I paid £275 for ( ). But getting back on topic, I refer back to my position of preferring to have a good tone between bass and amp that I like (given the musical situation). I can then add to it as necessary or upon request. But to start with a poor 'core sound' and live with it just because i'm GOING to add other sounds/effects seems like a backward way of doing things to me. I'm sure my tone has changed as I've grown and gigged more, thats the nature of things, I wouldn't say my basic tone is boring because I enjoy it and I believe it adds something to whatever music I'm playing. So therefore changing things for the sake of it, rather than it serving a purpose also seems backward to me........but perhaps it's me that's backward Si
  17. Well yes, point taken, but then the whole thread is subjective to the point of irrelevence, we proceed regardless though . Even if the individual tones of the two basses are perceived differently by me and you, lets say the band leader also prefers the sound of the Jazz over the Precision, then why would I continue to use a Precision at a show just for the sake of my personal need for 'Variety'. I love the Jazz equally, and in this example it's giving more to the music than the Precision does. That is surely the ultimate goal, to marry your personal gratification with making the music/band sound the best that it can. Si
  18. [quote name='4000' post='737248' date='Feb 6 2010, 02:42 PM']Why is it pointless (and I'm not just talking about music)? What has to be relevant given the musical context? Everyone will have different opinions of what is relevant given the musical context, hence the myriad tones/styles that are out there. I may be being dim but I'm not sure what point you're making. I think in terms of core tone (for a given instrument) I completely agree with you (maybe you misunderstood [i]my[/i] point); I certainly can't use what I think is a crap sound (and I almost never use pedals, although I do eq heavily). On a personal level my dilemma is I'm simultaneously looking for several unique sonic identities at the same time. [/quote] Ok so, I love the sound of Jazz's and Precisions...(oh I hope Bilbo doesn't read this bit ), but for me, they work in two different settings....this is specifically for me, I realise that everyone is different. So, variety for variety sake would be me using my Jazz in a setting that wouldn't suit the Precision, then at the next gig with same band, at the expense of the situation/music, I use the Precision just to add some 'spice to my life'. Do you see what I mean? Si
  19. I have an '09 Jazz 5 std. which I love, and I keep likening the case to a Rifle case lol! Great quality! Si
  20. Look great, will follow this eagerly!! What do you think your price-point will be eventually? Oh and do you know if the different shades of ash will be as obvious once they're lacquered up? Si
  21. [quote name='4000' post='737231' date='Feb 6 2010, 02:23 PM']Although I don't really agree with Sliddx on the overall topic I ceratinly agree that I'd be bored wearing the same underpants for ever. In my case at least, variety truly is the spice of life.[/quote] But variety for varieties sake is pointless!? It has to be relevant given the musical context!. But even that doesn't detract from having a good tone as a basis and adding to it as neceesary. Surely no one says "Oh it doesn't matter if my core sound is crap to my own ears, because all the bands I play in need loads of EQ and Pedals!?". Si
  22. [quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='737219' date='Feb 6 2010, 02:15 PM']Move into a house with another gearhead bassist. Stack amps higher than your head. Occasionally gaze at them with smug self-satisfaction.[/quote] This is what I've done Si
  23. Geddy Lee Jazz's are 20 frets, an American Jazz Deluxe is 21 Frets, and so the necks aren't inter-changeable, it would result in the bridge being in the wrong place and therefore impossible to intonate!. If you're talking about a Mexican Deluxe Jazz though, they have 20 frets and would be inter-changeable with the Geddy Si
  24. Which do you like more? Go for that one! Si
×
×
  • Create New...