Sibob

With this potential project, there’s obviously an element of ‘walk before you can run’, professional quality audio etc etc probably isn’t an absolute prerequisite at this stage. As long as things aren’t too messy, and everyone is audible and understandable, it’s more about interesting content, everything else is learned along the way. I’m always happy to edit audio, that’s easy enough. Skype is just an easy way of getting started, means you’re not restricted to people who are able...and willing...to record audio via a mic into a DAW themselves.....but maybe that’s a good thing at this point?! Don’t know. Si

If the appropriate knowledge is there! Plenty of people with more money than sense! Si

Think it would be easy enough to record. You can just record Skype into a DAW given the right interface, although not sure if that’s still the case if you have more than two people on the call. Will investigate when I get the chance (currently on holiday). Si

As you mention, talking ads is probably getting ahead of ourselves. The forum has advertising because it can boast thousands of users and interactions. A podcast relies on download numbers to prove listenership. But for what it’s worth, a 5-10 second Audio ad at the start of the podcast is usually about right. That’s about as much as you’ll get before people actively look to skip. I think it would absolutely pull in a new and different ‘readership’. Lots of people want easy-to-consume bass content, but have no interest in forums. Si

Just as a fyi, as someone who purchases advertising in the media, i’d be thinking twice about doing so with an outlet that actively encourages skimmimg over it (which a time stamp does). Si

Not quite as simple as that though is it. It’s worth whatever someone is willing to pay assuming it is what they think it is! Due diligence is key with vintage instruments! Si

Anything else, just ask Si

I also forgot to add, I agree with audio only. Much easier and good for background/car listening! Si

My personal take on the format is thus: A few, perhaps 4, different members each episode, who engage in conversation. Perhaps about some popular threads, or their story getting into bass, their gear etc. It obviously evolves from those basic points as it’s a conversation. I feel that format, perhaps over one hour, would be infinitely more interesting than just one person talking for x amount of time without answer. Si

Ultimately, I think that in any given situation, you should buy the best quality interface that your budget allows. With regards to low latency and tracking with plugins, it’s worth having a think about what that really means. It’s pretty rare for me to record bass with any plugins on it for example. Some singers might want a small amount of Reverb, but that’s not restrictive with a USB interface unless you’re running a very slow computer. The only situation where you need a hefty system and perhaps a Thunderbolt interface is if you want to record guitar using amp/pedal modeling plugins, and perhaps multiple instances of that, that can suck up power! Bear in mind that it’s not particularly usual to pile on plugins during the tracking phase, that all happens in the mixing stage, and at that point you can dime your buffer size. That allows more CPU to be used for plugins, you’re not fussed about latency at that point because you’re done with tracking. So have a think about what you’re doing, and what you want to do Si

General condition? Original case included? Plays nice? Pics? Si

First rule of marketing, let the happy customers talk about how good the products are Si

Apologies, i am fully in Clarett USB mode lol (as they’re the latest products). You’re all quite right though, if comparing Clarett Thunderbolt to Scarlett, the other difference is a significant improvement in latency. The Scarlett and Clarett USB latency is still very low, but the Thunderbolt Claretts allow a lot more latency ‘headroom’ for those large, processing heavy sessions. Si // Focusrite

Hi Daniel, Hope you don’t mind me chipping in on an official capacity, am only doing so as it’s both our products your’re comparing. Essentially what you’re paying for with Clarett is upgraded preamps, and the ‘Air’ feature, which hardware models the sound of our ISA preamps, really great for vocals (as well as other things of course, whatever your ear likes). So whilst the Scarletts sound great, the Claretts are a step up. If you’re running a very recent Mac (USB-C), and you don’t really need the simultaneous recording ability of the 4Pre just yet, you might also consider the 2Pre USB*, which you can bus power with your setup, no need for a power supply :). The 2Pre USB also comes with ADAT in, so you could increase channel count with something like a Clarett OctoPre at a later date if needed. Obviously in the Scarlett range, the 18i8 is the smallest unit to include ADAT in, so this is also a nice addition with the 2Pre. Any questions, please let me know. Obviously fully encourage everyone else to chip in too! I know there are some Scarlett and Clarett fans on here Cheers Si // Focusrite Media Relations *You can’t bus power the 2Pre Thunderbolt

Purchased this 2006 CIJ Fiesta Red Mustang a couple of weeks ago, very cool! Especially with some La Bella flats fitted! Si

Mid 2018 family pic, pre ACG, which should arrive in a month or so I think. L-R Bass Collection Jive fretless, 2006 CIJ Mustang, 1971 Precision, Lakland US custom 44-94, Lakland Skyline 55-01. Si

I’d sell the Warwick lol But if that’s a ‘keeper’, and you love Stingrays, sell the Jazz. Always have a Precision 😉 Si

With regards to bolt on, it's simply because you suggested that a well thought out design needs to have the neck flowing into the body (such as neck-through or set-neck), I don't think anyone has described a Fender neck join as 'flowing into the body', yet it will have been thought about an incredible amount from an engineering point of view (as Leo was). So ultimately we have a difference between what you deem to be aesthetically pleasing, and whether something has been thought about. With regards to the Fodera, everything would have been thought about to the Nth degree. Having owned one previously (although not this model), I found the layout to be ergonomic and intuitive, and can only image that the above is also true. I actually don't see an issue with it, but I see patterns in groups of things, as opposed to needing an overall uniformed pattern. For example I don't care how the switches are distanced from the EQ, but as long as the EQ is intuitively placed and spaced, then the switches are well placed/spaced in relation to each other etc. Again, it's simply a difference between what is aesthetically pleasing to you vs whether it's been thought out.....the two aren't mutually exclusive. The headstock shape vs the body shape, that's just the Fodera aesthetic, I don't think it looks weird or unbalanced, but you don't like it. Does that mean 'it hasn't been thought about' or is 'random', no, of course not . Ultimately, I just think you've been a bit blunt with your point, but it does ultimately boil down to it being totally subjective, same as everything on here.....which is fine, but unfair to accuse any builder of this pedigree of simply 'not thinking about it'. Si

You're suggesting that any custom bass that is bolt-on, knobs in a straight line and has a string tree has't been thought through?? lol Si

Very cool, late 70’s? How do you find the Mikey Way sig? I considered one before I got the CIJ, simple because it has a soapbar and I could easily drop in the soapbar version of Jake Serek’s B90 pickup! Si

Yeah, it’s a 2006 CIJ Mustang, didn’t want one of the P/Js, so waited for a Japanese one to come up! Si

Yup, bought the download and it’s brilliant! Si