Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bankai

Member
  • Posts

    1,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bankai

  1. I had the Terror Bass 500 and SP210.

    It was good, but I sold the Terror head on a few months later as it wasn't versatile or clean enough for me. I kept the cab for a couple of years until I sold it recently. It was very small and very lightweight but still loud enough for gigs. Although, you have to trade off sound quality and bass response to have something that small.



    If you NEED something small, then go for it. If you don't need something that small, get something else.

  2. I've just finished mixing my band's debut E.P

    The tracks were recording by somebody else (who hasn't done the best job of it) so I could only do so much.


    We're going to be releasing this in a couple of weeks so I've got some time left so sort out any issues. If anybody has time I'd very much appreciate it if you could give the tracks a listen and give me some feedback or suggest some alterations.


    Please ignore the file names, they are silly working titles!


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/eu6oiawrw68v7jt/YaldiAlex_BETAVERSION.wav
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/c56utewqo04vahr/GoodbyeAlex_BETAVERSION.wav
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/trryjlad7bo8u0a/SoundsLikeAlex_BETAVERSION.wav
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/0o7dlm73dwcsamw/AlexisRacist_BETAVERSION.wav
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qf6ty7357cwj85b/EmbraceAlex_BETAVERSION.wav

  3. Ok, all the encryption will do is mean that when your transmitter is off, the receiver doesn't receive a signal from another unit.

    Only one signal can be transmitted down a channel at once. So if there's two transmitters on a channel (let's call the one you do want A, and the one you don't want B ), there's two 4 possibilities:

    Transmitter A is on and B is off. In this case the receiver will receive A

    Transmitter A is off and B is on. In this case the receiver won't receive anything because B doesn't have the correct key.

    Transmitter A is on and the signal is strong, B is on but weak. The receiver will receive the encryption key from A and thus start receiving, but the transmission will be impaired by B which is also transmitting on the same channel. As such, audio will come through, but will be broken and interfered with by B.

    Transmitter A is on and the signal is weak, and B is on and strong. The receiver will receive the signal from A, but as B is stronger it will dominate. As such the receiver won't 'hear' the correct encryption and as such will not give any audio, despite A transmitting with the correct key in the background.

  4. [quote name='EBS_freak' timestamp='1389470356' post='2334574']
    The presence of an encryption key within the datastream transmission actually helps with RF hence reducing the chance of interference. There is a slight trade off in terms of latency, for example pro systems it adds an almost negligible 0.2ms but with other systems, maybe the AKG, it may be bigger.
    [/quote]

    If anything, encryption would make problems from interference worse. I don't understand how it could improve them.
    It'll stop eavesdropping, but not interference.

  5. The first question is, how much are you willing to spend?

    If you like the sound of the Sansamp I would imagine an Ampeg head of some form would be best to give you a similiar sound. If you can afford it, an SVT-II or SVT-CL will always be best, but if you're looking for something cheaper then the SVT-350 or SVT-450 can be bought for a good price second hand.

    As for the cab, if you can afford it then a Barefaced 69'er would be right up your street I imagine. It's a clone of the original Ampeg SVT810 'fridge' cabinet. Although the Barefaced is louder, better, and a lot lighter! Price wise, it's fairly costly. A cheaper option would be picking up one of the smaller Barefaced cabinets, or alternatively, just a 4x10 or 6x10 from a decent brand.



    This looks like a fairly good deal: http://basschat.co.uk/topic/219318-price-drop-ampeg-svt-pro-3-head-usa-92-ampeg-b-410hlf-cab-for-sale-l550/

  6. I use the MXR M80. Pretty much the same thing, I just went for this because it was a bit cheaper than the sansamp.

    http://www.jimdunlop.com/product/m80-bass-di

    I'm surprised to see so many top bassists using it rather than the sansamp. Check the list on the product page!

  7. If you use an amp simulating DI that wouldn't be the case.

    It effectively will create a DI signal that sounds like an amp when run through the PA (or something like it).

    Look at the Sansamp Bass Driver, the MXR M80, or the Behringer BDI21.

    You plug into that, and it splits out an untouched feed to the amp as normal, but then does funky amp modelling stuff to the DI output.

    The Sansamp and MXR M80 are both top notch, and the Behringer is a rather good budget version.

  8. [quote name='keeponehandloose' timestamp='1388254960' post='2320061']
    DONT do this!
    the high powered signal from the amps speaker outs will wreak havoc on such a piece of kit
    [/quote]

    No. The Behringer GI100 is safe to connect to loads of up to 3000W.


    Check the product page please: [url="http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/GI100.aspx"]http://www.behringer...ucts/GI100.aspx[/url]

  9. I would get the Behringer GI100 and connect it between your head and cab, enable the speaker emulation and then just let him plug into it.

    No need for mixing signals, or mics. That alone should sound fine!

  10. I had an Epiphone Pro IV. Probably my favourite bass to grab and play on. Despite what people might say about Tbirds!

    I ended up selling it though because I couldn't deal with the fact it said Epiphone. And yes, I know that's a truly terrible attitude to have but I felt like a fraud not using a proper Gibson one.

×
×
  • Create New...