-
Posts
4,976 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by Phil Starr
-
I've had a word with Ped and Kiwi and the answer is yes. It might take a while for us to get it together as it would make sense for us to put all the designs together in a single thread and just link to the rather extended original diaries.
-
Oh, no! A swapping speaker driver thread!!!
Phil Starr replied to Pea Turgh's topic in Amps and Cabs
Hope you love it, I'm quite loving the clarity I get out of mine. good for practice because it shows off your mistakes. Ouch! -
here's the original one 1x12" Cab Design Diary - Amps and Cabs - Basschat this is the cutdown sized one Easy 12" cab build - Amps and Cabs - Basschat The only thread I can find so far for the two way design has lost the pictures 12" Cab Diary Continued - Amps and Cabs - Basschat but i'll keep looking unles @stevie or @Chienmortbbfinds it before me
-
It's really great to see that this design lives on. I still use a variant of the original design without a tweeter and it sounds huge when it needs to.
-
I had to look that up To be honest it looks too nice to mod in the way I did, though everything I've done is reversible. On the plus side a single EL84 should sound fine through a little speaker for this sort of use. The problem with mine is amp distortion when you push too hard, you can't really over-drive an amp this size without it sounding nasty. I reckon this little amp will sound sweet. I'd go for building something the same size and finish as your little epiphone, something it will sit on and look right. If you give me the measurements I can suggest a speaker that might work
-
I agree John, I wouldn't personally look past the TPA series at the moment and you can get ready wired boards for all sorts of applications, so you need to do little other than make a case for them. the other issue is heat dissipation which is so much less for class D.
-
about 9litres the same size as the cab I used though that was luck rather than judgement. I've been wondering about something similar, you can buy an amp based on the TPA3116D2 for around a fiver which will run on a car battery or the TDA2030 if you don't want Class D on eBay TDA2030A Mono 15W Audio Power Amplifier Board AC/DC 12V Assembled Nice UKO FG | eBay
-
All PA speakers nowadays are designed to be as flat as possible, there is nothing special acoustically about those that are marketed as FRFR instrument speakers. There's no magic to speakers for bass either the rules of physics and economics still apply and cheap small speakers are still limited in their bass handling ability compared to larger and more expensive ones. There are still bargains and good value for money to be sought out but if something looks too good to be true it probably is something to be avoided. All FRFR really means is that they are trying to design something that is flat. You can always tell if music is acoustic or amplified and there will be slight variations in sound between PA speakers, so it is worth trying them and of course deep bass is always problematic at high volumes for any speaker. The fact you are looking for modest volumes with the PA doing the heavy lifting helps of course. Yamaha's active speakers are really highly rated at the moment. In listening tests a couple of years ago I thought RCF's had a slight edge on vocals and QSC make good kit. My current band use them as PA. I'm not sure that the difference between the best brands would be that obvious with bass. Those Yamaha's will tell you straight away if this approach is right for you. The only thing you are likely to find is that we have got used to 'voiced' speakers where someone has tried to make the speaker easily likeable. FRFR can be underwhelming at first, spend some time getting the eq right for you before you make a inal decision.
- 28 replies
-
- frfr
- full range
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't play upright (wish I did though) but it should be no different from going through the PA. the thing is that plenty of people have PA speakers so it shouldn't be a problem to find one to try out. If you live in Somerset for example.
- 28 replies
-
- 1
-
- frfr
- full range
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
No experience of the Harley Benton but I've owned a couple of T-Birds. The bridge on my Gibson wasn't an issue, it's a stupidly fiddly design but the action was fabulous no problems with intonation and once set up any fiddling was soon forgotten. The neck dive is just due to the reverse, that's why basses have a horn sticking out on the top, it's the only way to stabilise the bass with a strap. having a horn underneath makes it just a weight to induce neck dive and having the strap mount on the body and not a horn does the same. I too have found that bringing the strap round the front cures the problem but you'll get buckle rash on the front of your bass. Actually I found that the twist of the bass away from the body was more an issue than the dive. I'm wondering if they do a lefty, that would bring the pegs round to the 'correct side' and put the horn in the non-reverse position.
-
I use the Mk3 version of this, it just does what it says on the tin. I think the OP will struggle to get something FRFR with control over the tweeter though. It's kind of the point of FRFR that it has a flat response, but you'd normally use that system with some sort of modeller or pre-amp.
- 28 replies
-
- frfr
- full range
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
Coming from you that's a welcome comment. I know you re helping John (Chienmortbb) with his After Eighty project. I'm using this with my Zoom B1ON and I'm thinking of maybe something with little more than simple volume bass and treble and taking advantage of some of the high power chips they make for car audio. I want something simple enough for others to build so if I can use widely available ready assembled boards for the amp that would be good.
-
Ha ha Al, I thought you were having a pop at Alex for a second.
-
I think we all might be stuck in the dark ages. I belong to a political lobbying organisation and at a recent meeting we had a discussion on which system we should use to communicate and found that with 12 of us in the room there were 12 preferences for communication. With my current band we have some who use email others texts or messenger and none of the others use all three. Given we are a four piece and I prefer direct phone calls communication isn't great. My daughter considers it 'rude' to use a phone because she is usually with others and relies on what's app most of the time which I won't use because of their attitude to privacy. Each app has a learning curve which means they all feel unsatisfactory at first and you get swamped if you don't. I've seen people with 3000+ unopened emails, why don't they use the filters? I don't use my phone much, I can only read it with glasses which I only need for reading and are often not to hand. Even with glasses I struggle with some of the apps which are all designed by somebody with the eyesight I had 40 years ago. We're stuck here until someone comes up with a killer bit of software that sweeps away the problems or we all decide collectively on a universal system. The tech giants all want us to use only their ecosystems and have no vested interest in making it too easy. With any band you've probably got to go along with whatever they are using, though most bandleaders often seem to be unaware nobody is reading their emails,messenger,What's App etc,etc Thinking about it I prefer actually talking to people over a cup of tea or a pint. Would that those days returned
-
Oh, no! A swapping speaker driver thread!!!
Phil Starr replied to Pea Turgh's topic in Amps and Cabs
Bill's right, the other problem is the nature of the suspension, in an instrument speaker the suspension is likely to be progressive stopping the cone from leaving the magnetic gap. The roll surround will be designed for linearity. I've had a look at WinISD and this is the frequency response. I've assumed 9l for the cab volume the same as mine. The green plot is the Fane and the red the Farnell/Monacor. You get a lot more deep bass out of the hi fi speaker and it's flatter in response, what isn't shown here is that below 50Hz and with just 20W input it exceeds the excursion limits by a lot and this would lead to failure of the speaker in short order without an HPF. this isn't a problem with the Fane (or the other PA/bass drivers) I'm guessing that's why they rate it at 35W The Monacor is probably going to sound fine and will be an improvement on what you have which won't handle bass either but i don't think it will last long if you play it at any volume. £28 isn't much more than a set of strings so I'd still go for the Fane. -
Homemade bass cab, 4 x 12. Advice / experience please
Phil Starr replied to police squad's topic in Amps and Cabs
Is it a Marshall guitar cab shape with just the top two speakers on a slant? In any case just provide the internal measurements and i can work it out. Either give me the depth at the top and bottom if it's a flat baffle (front panel) or the depth and height where it bends if it is a split baffle. -
I wonder what's next, should we design something from scratch, use one of the cheaper pocket amps or just persist with simple mods like this? I'm thinking of having a look at my Hartke Kickback, It's been a really useful thing but weighs a ton for it's size bangs your legs when you carry it and falls over in anything but kickback mode.
-
Oh, no! A swapping speaker driver thread!!!
Phil Starr replied to Pea Turgh's topic in Amps and Cabs
Hi Peter, this is an odd one, the half roll surround suggests that this is a hifi speaker and that is what it is sold as. However for £12 you could just decide it is worth a try. The specs are a bit odd, for instance the 35W rating for a 1" coil on an aluminium former looks too low. I'd choose a known entity like the Fane 6-100 (£28) that I used or the Beyma CMV6. The Eminence Alpha that Bill suggested would be good too but expensive this side of the pond. However a 4x6 for £50+ some ply offcuts looks like fun, but I digress. I'll put those specs into WinISD tonight and let you know. -
Singing technique and stuff about how you sing
Phil Starr replied to police squad's topic in General Discussion
This is so true, one of my best friends is a professional opera singer and also a vocal coach. I know she'd love to teach me, she's a generous human and wants to convert the world to singing. I just couldn't cope with feeling that exposed. Not the way I feel about playing bass in front of her even though the musicians she works with are probably just as distantly ahead of me in their skills. There is something uniquely personal about singing. -
The Fane 6-100 is on offer at Blue Aran at the moment £28 + a few pence. Another alternative might be the Beyma 606CMV http://www.bluearan.co.uk/index.php?id=BMA606CVM28&browsemode=category If you want I can model the speaker in your cab and give you some port dimensions.
-
Oh, no! A swapping speaker driver thread!!!
Phil Starr replied to Pea Turgh's topic in Amps and Cabs
Here you go, this is my 'build' -
That's it really, I'm using it with the mains lead going in through the port at the moment. Let's not carried away, it sounds OK but there is almost no deep bass, a little warmth above 100 Hz helps but that is the point really, it doesn't annoy the neighbours as normal house structures are fairly good at containing the higher frequencies. It keeps up with two of us singing and my duo partners unamplified but enthusiastic acoustic guitar, it takes up very little space and it is plug and play. All the donor guitar combo provides is the amp and a ready made cab. Surprisingly the 10Watts advertised is actually 18W into the new 8 Ohm speaker and that is plenty. I'm contemplating replacing the power amp section with something that runs on a car battery and i need to move the IEC mains socket on to the rear panel but i'm happy that this was an experiment worth doing. Total time was about 90 mins over a couple of evenings
-
As a first step I cut a piece of ply to be a tight friction fit in the open back, I knew from previous experiments and from theory that you wouldn't get any bass when the sound from the back arrived and cancelled the sound from the front of the speaker. Actually sealing the cab made the original speaker sound a little better but I found that I could just drop the new speaker in so i did, total time so far was about 20 mins. this was getting there but was still bass light. Off to Win ISD to model the speaker in it's new cab. I used a hole saw to cut a hole in the ply and a hacksaw to cut 93mm of plastic drainpipe.
-
As you can see it was an open backed guitar cab just about 30cm tall. Ignore the speaker inside it had something much smaller which looked like a car speaker from the 1970's and not in any good way. Here's the speaker next to it's replacement, as you can see the original speaker had a tiny magnet and what you can't see is the flimsy cone. It was rated at 20W handling and 4ohms. the replacement was a Fane 6-100 rated at 100W but crucially with a heavier cone, good excursion limits and a proper magnet. Despite the slight loss of power this was going to be a little louder due to the larger magnet driving it harder.
-
Hi All this has been stimulated by two (thanks for the impetus @Pea Turgh )of us having the same need, for a tiny combo for 'quiet jamming'. Most of us will have had the same problem, even an acoustic bass just isn't loud enough when someone else starts playing a guitar and singing and maybe those wall are just too thin so any deep bass goes through them as a deep and annoying thud for the neighbours. In my case it was a stay in a rented holiday flat. I grabbed a tiny 10W guitar Combo I'd bought for my son about 20 years ago which had never been used. It did the job in that he could hear me but it sounded awful, it didn't have very little bass it had no bass at all and it was only loud enough because of the nasal tone. I wanted something just a bit better but in the same fomat, really tiny and something that would plug and play. Here's what I started with.