LawrenceH

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1083389' date='Jan 9 2011, 06:18 PM']Barefeced Big One or the 12" version, a PA tpye power amp and a really simple clean preamp, possibly one not intended just for bass.[/quote] I doubt there's anything else out there that could compete with these Barefaced cabs due to the 3-way design and I remember Alex put a lot into the crossover, which often lets commercial bass cabs down. However...have you ever actually heard properly flat and clean at gig volume? Amp-wise the PA suggestion is great for clean, but to get one that's genuinely good at bass is either heavy or very expensive, especially if you factor in the need for a separate pre. If you want light then unfortunately something like the Markbass F1 would be a good call as it has a clean, quick pre. Dunno what the alternatives are like in the lightweight head market, though the Tecamp Puma might be an option. There is a Tecamp 112 for sale in on here, I had one of these for a time but it was a bit too clean for my tastes! Like the Barefaced it has a dedicated mid driver and for a lightweight, all-in-one solution it might be just the ticket. EDIT: Just remembered the Tecamp combo only uses the 350w head rather than the 500w version...however I'd say that's not really important with respect to volume.

If you're planning on mixing pickup types then you might find the overwound pickup is lost when the pickups are both on full (despite being hotter output on its own), unless you used a buffering pre-amp. Best to check with Wizard if that's the route you're going down, I'd guess a single 64 would be a better match both tonally and resistance-wise than the 84 but I've not used them myself.

You could rewire the 8ohm 210 to 2ohm.

Based purely on spec, this seems like you get a lot less than with the HW1 basses for a fair bit more cash. May as well buy a Mexi and upgrade the pups. Not impressed.

I do think a lot of people associate 'valve' with 'dirt' but that for me misses a lot of the magic of really nice valve processing. I really didn't like the bass terror due to it's lack of subtlety - I'd go for a pre-amp gain that was capable of driving from clean to moderately distorted... and a nice warm optical compressor. Yeah!

I suggest practicing a pattern on a single fretted note to start with, alternating full and ghost notes in swung 8s because the swing helps emphasise which notes should be ghosted, da-dum da-dum da-dum etc. with 'da' being the ghost note One thing to remember is that for a really cleanly muted note you really need fingers on the left hand to mute the string at more than just a single point or you get problems with ringing harmonics. So in the example about I'd fret firmly on the LH index finger for the full note but for the ghost I'd raise this off the fret, keeping it on the string, at the same time as resting my LH ring finger on the string a fret or so up.

[quote name='Grand Wazoo' post='1078464' date='Jan 5 2011, 12:29 PM']The Ashdown head was plugged back into its own 1 x 15" cab and it worked fine I'd just like to know why it wouldn't work with the Mark Bass cab. Is it because both the Mark Bass and the Promethen are "class 5" amps whereas the Ashdow it's a based on an old fashion design all on tubes? Thanks[/quote] If the MB cab is 4 ohms then you definitely need to use the 4 ohm output, don't use the 8 ohm or you rist damaging the Ashdown head. There's no reason why an all-valve amp couldn't power these speakers, getting the ohm load right is pretty much all that matters. Given that both the Markbass and the Promethean use speakon outputs (I think?) as opposed to the jack on the Ashdown, I'd suggest that a dodgy speaker cable is your most likely explanation.

[quote name='Clarky' post='1078677' date='Jan 5 2011, 03:39 PM']I've not tried that so its a possibility, thanks. First I will try a splash of [s]Brut 33[/s] 3-in-one oil. I had a similar problem with my Fender Pino but that just required a bit less pussyfooting with the truss rod. In this case I am at bicep-busting level and the truss rod will not turn further. It just seems wrong to me, hence I wondered about just going to the expense of having it professionally seen to[/quote] Definitely sounds like it's maxed out, don't force it any more or you risk shearing the end off the truss rod. Get a washer or several underneath as suggested, my jazz needed at least 5mm to get it into a good range again and it's fine now. If that doesn't work, get it looked at, but I bet it does the job.

[quote name='Pete Academy' post='1075490' date='Jan 2 2011, 05:16 PM']Jeff Berlin once said he doesn't bother with fretless because everyone just ends up sounding like Jaco. For me though, Pino's playing is unbeatable and original.[/quote] Yeah, Graceland sounds just like Weather Report with vocals.... It's hard to think of a bass player with a more distinctive 'voice' to his playing than Kumalo. [quote name='crez5150' post='1075689' date='Jan 2 2011, 08:36 PM']What you're forgetting is that Jeff Berlin is a Cock![/quote]

[quote name='paul_5' post='1070512' date='Dec 27 2010, 08:55 PM']Arguably if everyone who stole music from the internet started to pay for it then the record companies would have more cash to support not just new, but semi-established artists who need nurturing artistically to produce their best material (good for artists, good for punters).[/quote] I really think this is the wrong way round wrt cause and effect - the majors started focusing their attention on short-term chart music gain long before downloading became any kind of issue. David Bowie among others has talked about the need for artists to focus more on live performance as a revenue source, I don't think this is such a bad thing.

As long as you liked the sound then the Markbass is as good as any out there - they use decent drivers and plywood for their cabs, and their failure rate is supposedly pretty low. Other people will surely be along with alternative suggestions but once you're at that quality level it's just a matter of personal taste IMO.

Interesting debate, lots of good points being made. My take - music files are a form of information. Copying them and passing them on is in that sense rather similar to patent infringement. Coming from left-field, thinking about the great economic debates of recent years we see a clash of competing ideologies, namely expansion-based capitalism and sustainability. To marry these two, the concept of information as currency becomes increasingly important. So we really should respect intellectual copyright if we have an environmental conscience, since a means of making money that doesn't involve transfer of material goods is a necessity! But. I doubt most of us are real economic idealists, we're primarily in it for the music. For me, I love live music and I think the recorded output of artists who disconnect from live performance usually suffers (not always). So firstly I don't think the move towards a model where a greater proportion of revenue comes from performance is a bad thing. Second, the major players in the music industry claim to be suffering as a result of illegal downloading, but could this be something they've brought on themselves by optimising their musical output from the point of view of disposability? Plus, just because one business model is no longer as viable does that translate to a problem for music as a whole? I seriously doubt it, the evidence is in the decreasing relevance of the singles charts and the burgeoning market for niche music of all kinds. What we're seeing is a fragmentation of the music market rather than a shrinking of that market per se. Of course, some people who base their living on the old system will lose out, but new opportunities arise, and that is ultimately the nature of capitalist markets. I like the way things are changing.

[quote name='redstriper' post='1067310' date='Dec 22 2010, 10:51 PM']Thanks, I was hoping you'd say that cos I'm a cheapskate ! There is one for sale on here now, but when I asked for the weight, the seller said 15 Lbs which is 4.5 Lbs more than my old bass. I'm sure they vary in weight and hopefully I'll find one more like 9 Lbs.[/quote] If that 15lb is accurate I'd be very surprised, basswood is not generally a heavy wood. Unless that high mass bridge is in fact depleted uranium.

[quote name='GarethFlatlands' post='1067034' date='Dec 22 2010, 06:06 PM']I'd agree to a point, but I'd rather have one of these than pay for that mojo. These seem custom made to spec and the attention to detail is stunning. That said, it's a lot of cash. I'd probably go for a Shuker if I had a grand or so to spare, played Finbars p-bass copy and it's incredible.[/quote] If it weighs 6.5lb, balances perfectly and still has the lovely resonance of a vintage jazz then it's got to be worth it for someone with back issues. All the best sounding jazzes I've tried have been heavy b*****s

[quote name='fatback' post='1067115' date='Dec 22 2010, 07:21 PM']Thinking about changing pups on a Squier VMJ fretless. Looking for something not too aggressive, more old school. Sort of musical. Mellow? Rich? That kind of sound. In fact, the stock pups are not bad at all, but the bass has such a nice neck it's probably worth upgrading a tad. I have no experience of anything but standard pups, so any ideas would be very helpful.[/quote] I'm not the pickup junky some people are but I was very pleasantly surprised by the Fender Vintage AlNicos that come loaded into the Highway Ones and Classic series jazzes - it's definitely a very musical, old-school vibe, and they're not expensive at all. I think Dave-bass5 on here has a Highway One (which would come with these) and also has some Wizard pickups, so it might be worth sending him a PM and asking how they compare. Wizard get recommended a lot on here for an old-school vibe and again they're comparatively cheap, definitely worth considering. By way of comparison, trying a VMJ I felt that the stock pickups were very punchy but a little harsh and definitely lacking in bandwidth (no true top end), they didn't sound at all open compared to a typical vintage jazz.

[quote name='lemmywinks' post='1066676' date='Dec 22 2010, 12:28 PM']A Schroeder 1212l will do the job, there's not many small, light one cab solutions if you play in a loud band with a heavy-handed drummer but my 1212r has always been more than enough.[/quote] The 1212l really intrigues me... it's quite an odd design with the dual woofer folded baffle, it's like a really stubby 'half-tapped' horn with a great big compression chamber. I'd be very interested in a frequency plot from the cab, see how flat they play. And what woofers are loaded into the modern ones? Anyway, to the OP, for a more conventional small/lightweight cab design it's very hard to look beyond the Midget, if the tone suits you. It will have quite an aggressive mid-range which will help cut in the mix but is probably what people would describe as a 'modern' sound. With the internal bracing and large slot ports they are probably one of the best-engineered cabs available, and for a 1x12 it's about as loud as you're going to get. Plus it weighs half what the Schroeder weighs. I wouldn't be concerned about it being 8 ohm as opposed to 4, because it's such a sensitive driver.

[quote name='waynepunkdude' post='1066223' date='Dec 21 2010, 10:17 PM']I'm after anything but red due to the guitarist in a band I play in has the red guitar version.[/quote] Sod him! The red one is a hottie

[quote name='4 Strings' post='1066017' date='Dec 21 2010, 06:46 PM']This seems to be a rather recent phenomena that for almost any bass for sale, especially old Precisions, the first question regards its weight. Why is this?[/quote] Because all the kids playing their hip young person's music got old.

[quote name='gary mac' post='1065752' date='Dec 21 2010, 03:11 PM']I've got a VMJ and it's a very very good bass. I would advise you to try before buying though as the first three I tried were decidely ropey one way or another. Also some of them are very heavy, for example my daughters one is over 11lb.[/quote] +1 - All the ones I've seen in shops have been a bit dicey QC-wise, but from pics up on here I can see people have some very nice examples so they must be out there. The (fretted) ones I tried sounded really nice though.

[quote name='StevieD_FenderP2009' post='1065604' date='Dec 21 2010, 01:02 PM']Also, LawrenceH, I did fit a Badass II straight into the holes as that is what I replaced the bridge I sold to Paul with. it just dropped straight on again without any modifications to the bridge or body[/quote] Weird, as I said above I've got a Gotoh 201 and the screw spacing's definitely about 70mm (confirmed [url="http://www.wdmusic.co.uk/product/Bass_Bridge_Chrome_GEB201C"]here[/url] I was sure the badass II was interchangeable with that bass - sure they weren't widened screwholes from being redrilled on the P? It would only have to be bigger by 2.5mm on each of the outer screwholes. It's definitely not a Jap v MIM/MIA issue as all my basses, plus the Gotoh, measure the same. P basses are the same as Js at the bridge, right?

[quote name='Grand Wazoo' post='1065300' date='Dec 20 2010, 11:57 PM'][size=2][b]Yes sorry guys, the postage cost is not down to me, mainland uk its £30 and to any other European destinations turns into £90, I can't do bu**er all about that. Of course if the winner is close by and willing to collect it from London, Greenwich area, I will refund the UK postage cost of £30, and bob's your uncle [/b][/size][/quote] Which courier is that?! Btw I can't believe this didn't sell on here - I'd have been all over it like a rash if I didn't already have 3 jazzers! Good luck

[quote name='Paul S' post='1064933' date='Dec 20 2010, 07:07 PM']Could someone with a MIA Precision and/or Jazz please step up here? I am trying to sell this bridge on and could really do with the information. Thanks![/quote] An MIA J or P will be totally different thanks to the through-body stringing, unless it's a reissue or quite an old one. The USA 75RI has the same bridge spacing as the others, ~70mm. I'm pretty certain P basses without through-stringing option are the same as Js. Maybe ask Stevie if he can give you a photo of the bass it came off without bridge attached? I'm can't believe he could have fitted a Badass II in the same screw holes.

[quote name='Chris2112' post='1064244' date='Dec 20 2010, 07:05 AM']If this were the optimum arrangement for the system they'd probably be making them like that.[/quote] Look at it from a biomechanical perspective and that doesn't really make sense - the length and proportions of the arm of the player will vary the angle of pivoting as well as the scale distance that can be covered comfortably. Tonally as well, optimum scale length depends what you're after. I'm sure 34 to 37 is a good choice for a lot of people, but that Super J looks more my thing. Purely based on the degree of curvature my wrist position naturally wants to place on my hand at different points up the neck I'd probably be happy with a very subtle fanning.

I like the concept of fanned frets, but would be more interested in a less extreme version of it - say a scale length that varied by an inch or so.

The TV sound thing is particularly challenging as you have very strict requirements for dynamic range and frequency balance. Plenty of bands sound pretty ropey on TV even nowadays (just listen to Glasto highlights!), I wouldn't judge a band's sound based on it.