Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

rwillett

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by rwillett

  1. I keep looking at this and thinking that’s exactly what it would like if I made it. Which is why I don’t. I also keep thinking that somebody has a hole in their pine floor shaped like a thunderbird bass rob
  2. The vendor has apologised, sent a picture of the one they are going to sen which looks a lot more authentic. I was gearing myself up for an argument but they have promised to sort it out. I already have a new tracking number from them. I’ll see how it goes. rob
  3. @BlueMoon Thanks for this. I have a 97 Fender MIJ Jazz bass and mine has no stampings or logo, and it only has the rear five screws. I think somebody pointed out that the Gotoh might have grooves as well. Not found a single picture of any MIJ Fender from that era with seven screws. Have queried it with the vendor and am awaiting a response. Thanks Rob
  4. Sent an email back to the vendor asking for all my money back. Will keep looking for a real one for my 1997 MIJ Jazz. Thanks Rob
  5. It is the same.as in the photos. However the eBay title and description says “Genuine Fender…”. Should there be a stamping of logo on it? My experience here is pretty much minimal it didn’t cost a lot £30 with postage and I’m 99.9% certain that eBay will refund me if I open a dispute as it’s not genuine. I just need some facts to back up my hunch. thanks Rob
  6. I brought this off ebay (yep, first red flag) as a "Genuine Made in Japan Fender Jazz Bridge 1999". When it turned up, it has a set of holes in the back of the bridge for mounting plus two holes towards the front of the bridge, see pictures below. My MIJ 1997 Fender Jazz Bass only has screws at the back of the bridge. I was told when I brought the bass that the bridge wasn't original, which is why I wanted an original one. However I now have doubts as to have genuine this bridge is. It's not that well finished on the base of the bridge, but its not too bad, the rest of the bridge looks OK, but it has no other logo on it or stamping. I have looked through dozens of Fender Jazz basses and cannot find a single picture of a fender with screw holes at the front of the bridge. So I'm wondering if its not genuine. Any help or advice welcomed.
  7. Started playing guitar whilst first year at Uni. Was pretty crap then. Practised really hard over the intervening years and with a significant amount of effort and hard work have moved to crap. I play the guitar how I played rugby, pretty much as a blunt instrument to be tackled into touch at every opportunity. Never take a step backwards and if in doubt hit it harder. I was a pretty good open side flanker until I made the inevitable transition to blind side and then hooker as I got slower and fatter. Again pretty much like my guitar playing. I was gifted (stole?) a cheap p-bass at Xmas. Found in a loft and I had a play without the slightest idea what I was doing. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Started reading books and learning scales. Decided to spoil the habit of a lifetime and get taught properly by a bass tutor in Sedbergh. Slowly getting slightly better than crap with significantly more enthusiasm than skill. would love to play blues in a band with similar ambitions to my own (none) but given where I live, highly unlikely. I am expecting to do Grade 2 this year though and am as pleased as punch. rob
  8. I am just watching the Ukelele Orchestra of Great Britain on YouTube playing "Smells like Teen Spirit" as we speak. I suppose (hope) satire is excused.
  9. Damm, beat me to it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law)
  10. Thank you. Was looking for something like Tim. I'm selling a Lunt Solar scope and if you think guitars are difficult to ship, try high end optical gear. Triple boxed, and dedicated cut-to fit-foam between each box. Knowing there is a decent courier makes my life a lot easier. Will call him once its sold. Rob
  11. Technically the lady is about a Googleplex times better than I am, indeed I would say that @funkgod 's dancing chicken is better than I am. But after listening to the video, my head hurts. That could be because I had three vaccinations yesterday, Rabies, DTP and MMR (it's real tough living in Yorkshire), or it could be that this type of jazz gives me a headache. I'm with @Burns-bass here and "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should". I seem to recall some blues great in the sixties stating "it's not what you play, it's what you don't play". Brilliant technique, but where's the spirit? Where's the emotion? Might be that I just don't get this type of jazz, but I'd rather hear Lemmy playing almost as fast nine times out of ten. I wish I could play like her but then I'd play something different. Rob
  12. S'Manth Abstracting the hardware away makes good sense. I'd do the same for the reading and writing of information to storage. The extra overhead of an abstraction layer is negligible. Don't forget you could also look at long presses of the switch, short presses, double taps. The latter could be difficult to do on stage TBH 😊but might be worth thinking about just in case. Four switches gives you an awful lot of options. Are you still planning on an LCD per switch? If so, then abstracting this output layer as well makes even more sense as you have two buttons working together to do something. Looking good Rob
  13. It's pretty good when the back is as beautiful as the front. Rob
  14. I already have a Lake Placid blue MIJ 97 Fender Jazz but this is gorgeous and actually looks better then mine. Thankfully you are about as far away me as you can be and still be in England. Why somebody hasn't come along and taken this off you, I have no idea. I'd be checking what the kids are worth these days to raise some cash. I suppose you don't want to swap it for a stroppy 14 year old? Sadly we aren't allowed to apprentice them to chimney sweeps otherwise I'd have done that. I'd hate to sell this guitar. Rob
  15. That tape would be brilliant if he wanted to swing from the guitar underneath a helicopter whilst flying through New York. You could probably use that tape to hold the neck on without any bolts. You might even hold the helicopter together. May I respectfully, in defence to @TheGreek and his clearly vastly superior experience to my own, suggest a low adhesive double sided tape. Search for "low tak double sided tape" on Amazon and take your pick. Rob
  16. People misunderstand how long it takes to set a CNC machine up. I built a CNC machine as a lock down project (see here https://forum.v1e.com/t/new-build-in-clapham-north-yorkshire-uk/16519) so have some experience here. I am not a professional in this area (or any other area 😀) It took a long time to build the CNC, but it takes an awful long time to design something that isn't just a simple engraving. If I wanted to do a house sign, thats pretty easy. Cutting space for pickups would be relatively easy as well. Anything that is complicated, such as the guitar above, could take a long, long time to design and get right. If they told me, it took 50 - 100 days to design and test, redesign and test, I wouldn't be at all surprised. I would expect them to create an awful lot of saw dust as well, I certainly did. A CNC machine makes sense in some areas, but it is not a cheap machine to buy (good ones are over £100K), they are not cheap to run, you tend to need a dedicated machinest, not cheap to design for, it takes real skill. Routing out pockets for pickups is fine, that work of beauty above is very difficult. I'm not bad with Fusion 360 and have designed some reaonably complex stuff, which tends to be square and lots of straight lines, but I wouldn't even know where to start in that guitar. This took over six months to design, test, redesign, retest. It's a magnetic, modular dust show for collecting waste from a CNC. it uses magnets to hold things together. It didn't work very well 🤐 Circa $8,000 doesn't sound that bad to be honest. Not cheap, but you pays your money and takes your choice. Thanks Rob
  17. That's really nice of you all. I have a slight tear in my eye. Thanks Rob
  18. The honeycomb doesn’t have lots of perimeter or infill. It’s 20% infill , 0.2mm speed setting. Still 22 hours 😒
  19. Just had a quick look at printing it, this one piece is a day. This is nearly three days to print. Took me 30 mins simply to get it to fit. This piece is approx 750g, so around £15 of a reasomable PETG or PLA filament. Will look, but its a lot of printing. Rob
  20. Small incremental changes, lower the gap distance, round off the edges would be two improvements that come to mind Anyway, they are in the post, Rob
  21. I've looked at that and thought Mmmmm..... My problem is I get easily distracted by new shiny blingy things, or just anything really. I have a search on eBay at the moment for the parts for this, basically a decent neck and the rest I'll wing it. A reasonable bridge, and some cheap pickups. The article used a Harley Benton as a doner kit of parts. No idea if they are any good. It's pretty simple to print, thought it will take some time. At the end of the day though, are you going to have a better than £250 Telecaster? It will be different which is always good, but better than a basic Squier? Anyway we're going off topic. Rob
×
×
  • Create New...