Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

essexbasscat

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    2,094
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by essexbasscat

  1. [quote name='bumnote' timestamp='1390734980' post='2348700'] You wouldnt save much money even if they did. You would pay 20% vat on top of the selling price if they had a uk branch and you would pay it on an import. Sometimes if you get a small ish and not too expensive an item it slips through the net and you dont get charges [/quote] There's that too. Looks like UK suppliers if at all possible then.
  2. Thanks folks I'll have a look at those sites for the right crowning tool. The angled one I'm using at the moment leaves too many tooling marks, so it's looking like a [expensive] diamond crowning tool [expensive]. Trouble with Stewmac is they seem to have all the right tools and no UK branch
  3. Pretty much what it says on the top really. Is there a UK division of Stewmac that anyone's found ? There must be a way around that import duty, surely ? Cheers All
  4. [url="http://youtu.be/TybKdYaeFUE"]http://youtu.be/TybKdYaeFUE[/url]
  5. Believe it or not, I can't find the previous thread on this. Is there a difference in sound ? Ok, two cabs are often lighter to carry but ...
  6. [url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BRUCE-FOXTONS-AMPEG-SVT-II-CLASSIC-BASS-HEAD-PRIVATE-COLLECTION-CASED-/161175758851?pt=UK_MusicalInstr_Amplifiers_RL&hash=item2586d2e803#ht_1840wt_958"]http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BRUCE-FOXTONS-AMPEG-SVT-II-CLASSIC-BASS-HEAD-PRIVATE-COLLECTION-CASED-/161175758851?pt=UK_MusicalInstr_Amplifiers_RL&hash=item2586d2e803#ht_1840wt_958[/url] Grab it while you can
  7. Joe sold me a practically new Hercules stand for a great price. Really friendly too We had some fun meeting up at Victoria Station, as my phone died that afternoon. Meeting at Victoria ? don't agree to meet at WH Smiths - there's two of them ! (guess what happened - yes, of course) Thanks Joe, well met Tom
  8. Simon sent me an extremely well packaged pair of Fralin pick ups. Also friendly to have a natter with on the PM's as well It's all been said above and I'm in agreement, I'd definately deal with Simon again Cheers Tom
  9. The Use of The Self by FM Alexander. ISBN 978-0-7528-4391-9 I'm up to page 70 at the moment
  10. Can be very useful for some people. Can also take some time to do properly, as after all, the technique is all about learning a different way of doing things we already do, in other words, changing habits. We all know how easy that is
  11. The link doesn't go to any relevant info. Any details of spec available ?
  12. Good point earlier about raising the backline amps, always a winner that one. Also relative positioning of mics, monitors and FOH. Were the FOH speakers directly facing any reflective surfaces ? avoiding that helps. Were the high pass filters engaged on the desk ? Acoustic guitar OP ? did you cut the bottom end at the desk from the acoustic ? that could cause the muddiness (and even boom) you mentioned right there A 2x10 OP ? if it's a 2x10 bass cab, it may be biased towards low end frequencies, which may re- enforce the muddiness you speak of. Just more food for thought
  13. [quote name='JTUK' timestamp='1388775372' post='2325991'] Impossible to say, really, you have to be there, but you may not have been entirely to blame either. We have found that the P.A soundman's answer to this is often to just turn up the P.A when what you should be going for is a mix. This means you both have to concede there is a problem and then decide on the best way to approach fixing it. It the band decides one thing and the soundman another, what normally happens is that both parties give up at some fraught point. The soundman decides he can do nothing positive and may attend only the most drastic noises and the band resign themselves to not hearing themselves and just getting through it. What makes this much much worse though, IMO, is when sounds have to be EQ'd.... as then you are fighting sound as well as levels and most of us don't often get 2hr sound checks for band and support. The way to help here is that you know the band has sorted its own sounds out at some point and know how it NEEDS to sound... The one thing that gets sacrificed usually, is the stage sound, but then your engr better be worth that..and often they aren't... IME. The only thing I can really offer is find a sound guy you really trust and knows what he is doing and put him on the gig payroll and also practice getting the band sound sorted in very quick time...which means that you want to be hearing everything everytime. Gts and keys need special attention because they either have or want full range sounds............. You can't allow this and still get the bass to sound seperated... Basically..IMO..anytime you can't hear the bass, the band mix is shot... [/quote] Excellent post
  14. Thanks all I did wonder if CTS pots were regarded in much the same way as the SM58 microphone, an industry standard that so many people bought because it seemed that everyone else did. However, the CTS pots do appear to be highly regarded in their own right. I still wouldn't mind finding that old thread though where someone tested another high end pot. Thanks again
  15. [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1388750829' post='2325521'] Sound is such a subjective thing, and best quality electrically doesn't always equate to a pleasing sound. [/quote] Ok, I'm curious. Can you expand on this a bit ?
  16. Excellent 6v6 and thank you. Is there any difference in sound quality between the three ? are PEC worth the extra in your opinion ?
  17. Out of interest, what mics were you using ? I'm no expert, but I've heard that some mics are better at reducing feedback than others. Examples of feedback reducing mics are renowned to be; Sennheiser e945, Electrovoice ND 967. There's also examples of reducing boom from hollow stages by using de-coupling devices such as the Gramma Pad. Was there a graphic equaliser that demonstrated which frequencies were feeding back ? Just some thoughts here. I'd be more than happy for people to discuss these ideas, whichever way the discussion goes, if we all learn from the process
  18. Hi all There was a thread around here a while ago where someone tried one or two different potentiometers in their bass. They didn't use the tried and tested CTS pots, but an alternative. I remember they waited for the pot to arrive, installed it and reported back with their findings. I've had a search, but can't find the thread. I've just bought some Fralins for my RW P bass and would like to install the best pots for the job. Ideally, I'm looking for some high quality pots that have just a bit of 'weight' to them when they're turned. Not sluggish drag or grinding resistance, but a well engineered positive feel. Can anyone recommend some high quality pots or recall the thread ? Thanks BC EBC
  19. I would [i]sooooo[/i] like to buy this , but way out of my price range at the moment. Good luck with the sale
  20. Windmills of your mind from the 60's goes all over the place
  21. If you're looking for silly cheap, try a Westfield e4500. It's a through neck les Paul that really does punch way above it's weight. I set one up a little while ago and was pleasantly surprised what you get for under £100 secondhand
  22. Totally agree Beedster, always rated the bass work on those films. Can't get through 11 without picking my bass up at least once
  23. Y'know that's not a bad idea NW, it would make the mizward more user friendly. Still wouldn't mind hearing about other decent quality small (ish) desks though ..... Anyone ?
×
×
  • Create New...