I always thought those RBXs were gorgeous. A couple friends had RBX765As that looked amazing, and just a year or so ago I bought an RBX6JM that was perfect apart from the 35” scale.
Not very much in it, a smidge more attacky through the bridge, more sustainy through the body. Similar to bolt-on, neck through. YMMV.
I think the diagonal stringing just means there is less bend on the strings at the saddle.
I don’t disagree... but I also hated the pickup surrounds on the older BBs so everyone’s different! I tried both stringing options and have stuck with through-body. Astounded to have all those options on a bass that cost so little though!
The 435 isn’t just string through though, it offers two options of either string through bridge or through body.
Economically, it would make more sense to use the same bridge for all the 3 series basses rather than two different ones.
As the others have said, the extended B stringing gives options and a tauter feel when stringing through the bridge rather than through the body. The question for me is why they didn’t do it for the 735 and P35!
I’d say don’t limit yourself to American ones. I’ve had a couple Japanese ones which are every bit as good or even better. I have a 61 and a 64, and I always end up picking up my 7.4lb ‘85 MIJ medium scale P now...
Well that’s the thing, they sound absolutely fine. Will probably have a play with strings first before I think about pickups. It’s genuinelt astounding for what it cost.
The price I got on my 435 is pretty much unbeatable IMO, more than £850 less than the cheapest P35 price I’ve seen. I may yet change out the pickups and get the fingerboard dressed and rolled.