Earbrass

[quote name='BOD2' post='251411' date='Jul 30 2008, 03:30 PM']you could look at the [url="http://www.studiospares.com/Mixers-Analogue/Soundcraft-Compact-4-Desktop-Mixer/invt/267570"]Soundcraft Compact-4[/url][/quote] +1 for the Soundcraft Compact 4: 4 channels (2 mono, 2 stereo), 2 mic preamps, even has a DI button on channel 2 for electric bass/guitar. Very flexible routing options (record bus/monitor bus/main bus), 2 headphone outs, small, neat, pretty and quite cheap (mine cost me about £60 new).

Lau - the Live album, currently on track 3 Frank and Flo's - brilliant, even though there's no bass guitar Saw them live at the Slaughtered Lamb last month - best gig I've seen in years.

Thanks everyone - very enlightening!

[quote name='cheddatom' post='130126' date='Jan 29 2008, 04:37 PM']I would say 600Hz is more "mids" than 2.5K. Whether or not either is of more use on bass or not........ I personally like to boost both mentioned frequencies on my amp. When recording, I use the EQ in my DAW. Do you not have this option?[/quote] Hi Tom, I'm using a very simple digital 8 track for recording, which has no EQ (Fostex MR-8 MkII - super portable, runs on batteries if you need - record anywhere with no earth hum! - CD spec straight to Compact Flash). I use this set-up as I move around a bit and wanted something portable. I am a luddite and only use computers for archival / compiling and burning CDs etc. (25 years as a computer programmer - say no more). Thanks to yourself and umph for your comments. In the end I expect I'll go for the Soundcraft cos it looks prettier. I'm so shallow.

Hi all, I'm going to have to buy a small mixer in the near future for my modest home studio. Main contenders at the mo are the Soundcraft Compact 4 and the Alesis Multimix 6FX. On the whole I trust Soundcraft more when it comes to mixers, but one difference between the two is the midrange EQ - the Alesis mid is 2.5K (peaking), the soundcraft is 600Hz. A few reviews have commented that the Soundcraft's 600Hz is an odd choice and not very useful, but I was wondering which you all thought would be better for bass guitar. Any thoughts (or other comments about these two products) ? Regards E

Back in the mid 90's, I got a lift home from Tilda Swinton. She asked me where would be the best place to buy filing cabinets, and I suggested Exchange and Mart. I've always thought that constituted a kind of bond between us. And I once had a cup of tea and a chat with Mike Leigh during the interval at a play - but didn't realise who it was till afterwards! Oh, and in the mid 80's I used to rent a room from Bernard Hill's ex-missus - he used to come round sometimes. As did Matthew Kelly. Can't think of any others at the mo....

[quote name='cetera' post='58777' date='Sep 11 2007, 04:22 PM']Prob around £400 - £450 I would think...[/quote] I sold mine a few months back on ebay, with gigbag: it fetched about £415, which was only bout £25 less than I paid new (also on ebay) E

Just to add a footnote to this thread...I've seen ads claiming great things for metal resonator basses, like that they have great volume and penetration compared to the standard wooden acoustics. So yesterday, when I was browsing in Denmark Street and saw such a bass in a window I went in and had a go. It was an Ozark, purely acoustic, medium scale, on sale for about £325. Didn't think much of it - tone was nasty, not much volume or bite and it was heavy as hell. Anyone had any good experiences of this kind of bass? E

[quote name='wateroftyne' post='36950' date='Jul 25 2007, 05:42 PM']I've used them both extensively, and they're night and day, IMO. However, the MBII does it so much better, and is far more natural sounding. The SABDDI mid-scoop is always present, no matter how far back you roll the bass & treble knobs. Sure, you can roll back the blend, but that's taking the interesting stuff out of the signal as well (drive, speaker simulation, etc.) The EBS is great for rock and roll, but also... my fretless P sounded indistinct via the SABDDI. Using the EBS it has a whole 'life' about it. SABDDI? Great. EBS MBII? Far better.[/quote] Cheers wateroftyne - I was being a bit slow there - didn't realise the "SABDDI" people had been referring to elsewhere in the thread was in fact...oh well, it's been a long day.

How does this compare to the SansAmp Bass Driver DI? Anyone used both?

I've owned just four basses over a thirty year period. My first was a Kimbara Jazz Bass Copy, bought new sometime in 1977. A beautiful looking Jap copy with natural blonde finish and a great tone, but as I recall, very heavy. I had it defretted at some point, and eventually sold it some time in the mid to late eighties. I was then bassless for many years (my main instrument is piano), until about three years ago when I took a Peavey Milestone III from a Cash Converters for £50 including gigbag. I'd forgotten how much fun playing bass was, and was soon re-converted to the cause. After a year or so, I decided I'd treat myself to a 'proper' bass, and started visiting music shops. It was only after trying a few that I realised how light the Peavey is by comparison - memories of lugging the Kimbara in its solid case came flooding back, and I resolved that any new bass would be no heavier than the Peavey's 8 lbs. Which is how I ended up buying a Fender Aerodyne Jazz, bass #3. I kept the Peavey, as it was convenient to have two basses, one at home and one left at a friend's house where I played regularly. After another year or so of switching from one to the other on a regular basis, and using both for recording projects, I came to the conclusion that there really wasn't much to choose between them in feel or sound, and I realised that I actually slightly preferred the neck on the Peavey, which was also quieter for recording use. I sold the Aerodyne for about £20 less than I'd paid for it, and bought another Peavey Milestone III off ebay for...£50 including gigbag. So I now have 2 identical basses (except for the colour) for a total of £100. I have no plans or desire to buy another (well, maybe an EUB one day, when I've retired and have the time to learn it). Loving them Peaveys! E