.jpg.518c69c2d9e1581799f3c11301dc2da5.jpg)
EBS_freak
-
Posts
13,853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by EBS_freak
-
It isn't technically classed as Ch38 at all. It's 65/66. It's covered under the "shared mic license", which covers both ranges of the spectrum covered by Ch38 and CH65/6. Ch 65/6 is actually pretty noisy. Only reason that I am being pedantic, is that this stuff is hard enough for people new to radio to understand without putting statements in saying 823-832 is channel 38. It's just that its licensing is covered by the same license as that of Ch38.
-
Looks like the noise floor could be quite high (but that's not an issue once you are playing). Focus mode is not unusual on a stereo system... in fact, it should be kind of a given. Although I do think it's rarely used in practice, especially now that we are into the realms of remote controlled digital desks. U4 is mono, so it's never going to have that kind of functionality. U4 is defo going to sound better from the get go. I wouldn't go as far as saying the LD is better... the LD has never floated my boat... again, compander. Unless you want stereo, I'd go for the U4... although, as stated in the other thread, the system that I think is currently where it's at is the MiPro - although I do appreciate that's quite some price hike. But if you are using it as a rig/monitor replacement... it kinda makes sense.
-
@Al Krow I found this quite interesting. The audio sounds OKish. Doesn't sound particularly wide but seems reasonable enough. 31:20 seems to show it's not too shabby for bass. Reading the comments in YT, it may be the case that it doesn't play that nice with other wireless... who knows? For less than a 100 quid, probably worth a punt.
-
I wouldn't be going near it... I'd wager it's got a woeful compander on board for that kinda money. But... you know, for the money, it may be worth a punt...? It may be a hidden gem. But... if you want to use on a free to use frequency range... or the shared mic license range, you'll need the 830.000 to 866.000 MHz range that they seem to manufacture for - and operate in 863-865 to remain legal (channel 70). You'll also be able to use 830-832 (as part of the 823-832 shared mic license range).
-
Playing whilst Sick (Tales/regrets when the show went on..)
EBS_freak replied to ARGH's topic in General Discussion
Did a gig where I was sitting on stage puking up into a bucket. Not my finest moment. -
Nice new Warwick Streamettes are in at Andertons now
EBS_freak replied to Mudpup's topic in Bass Guitars
How many years will they be sat on the website do you think? -
Aye, Amazon and eBay are probably your goto to get them the quickest.
-
Whats the format of your HD? Whats your monitor?
-
Why so many models? Because they have figured out that places like head-fi.org are obsessive about such things. Price them cheap enough and they will sell loads (many models to an individual too) as people in that space are borderline obsessive about comparing and contrasting. This advertising piece did make me smirk though - "shocking sound quality"
-
UE Black Friday deals emerging... 30% off UE11 upwards...
-
What he said. ^
-
Nice new Warwick Streamettes are in at Andertons now
EBS_freak replied to Mudpup's topic in Bass Guitars
I dont think solo bass is her bag to be fair. She's great in a band situation playing rock. But then again, if you are looking at selling basses... I've never thought the bass demos for Andertons has ever been that great tbf... but meh, what would I know. I'm not the target audience. -
That's odd. So whats your wiring look like when using XLR?
-
Have you switched the internal switch to stereo?
-
For those using XLRS from the desk... this may be quite useful - Wired like - That way you are on a standard XLR cable.
-
Just incase anybody is thinking about how to terminate a XLR one end (so that they can use a single XLR with a stereo signal with a P2)
-
As for jacks falling out... get something xlr based and it will lock in.
-
@police squadhttps://www.pmtonline.co.uk/lynx-al22s-headphone-splitter-with-1-4-inch-connectors Sorry to hear about your headphone infection - get on top of it quickly. I had an infection that left me with permanent problems.
-
You’d be better off putting a mixer in front of your headphone amp to sum first. You could then use the headphone out on that mixer (and use a passive vol belt pack to have an easy to reach vol control) - or use the line output to go into a powered headphone belt pack.
-
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Microphone-SYNCO-Smartphone-Streaming-Wireless-Lavalier-Microphone-SYNCO-G2/dp/B091L4WZ91/
-
(There's probably a cheaper chinese knockoff - but you probably want both the mic and the mic input options on the transmitters (not that you can use both simultaneously - but it gives you options) You can output from the receiver into the P2 to give you a more useful, quick access volume control. The Rodes will need line of sight though...
-
Im thinking along the lines of the RODE Wireless Go 2 - a bit left field. Two transmitters, one receiver. So use them as just mics, or use the LR from the desk to send to one of each of the transmitters.
-
Would 250 quid be classed as cheap(ish)? (Remember, this is wireless IEMs)
-
Usually pretty consistent here. But it depends upon what you are using. The biggest variance for me would be drums and percussion )which are miced) - everything is through modellers. Using a separate monitor desk may be one of the reasons for such consistency however, as EQ and stuff never really changes and doesn't need to change... all the room based EQ and processing is on the main desk. Even with one desk, I wouldn't haven't thought that there should be that much variance... unless you have mics that are picking up a load of the room (and there's reasons why you wouldn't want to gate them (e.g. overheads, percussion toys, lead vocals etc)
