[quote name='eude' timestamp='1332416690' post='1587908']
I'm not sure the scale length is the only way to achieve a good low B, both my current basses and have 33" scale length and the low B on both is fantastic, in fact it wipes the floor with other low B's I've tried on basses I won't name here, ranging from 34" to 36" in scale length.
The additional length of course plays a part, and is obviously the [i]easy[/i] way to get a good low B, but a super stiff stable neck and body construction, plus some additional luthier voodoo can get you there too.
Eude
[/quote]
Indeed - I don't disagree with this. Theres as much in the stiffness of the neck and the ability of the pickups and preamp to transfer the vibrations into a solid sounding B. Good pickups and preamp, solid contruction, luthier voodoo [i]then[/i] you get a good B. Scale length only serves to add a sprinking on top of a good solid B already.
Of course, one persons idea of a good sounding low B and another's is always open for debate. The Dingwall low B has never been a selling point for me... as I simply think there are better out there without the fanned frets... but thats not to say the Dingwall B isn't good...