Very kind of you to say.
 
	 
 
	When you see stuff conversations like this on facebook, it always makes my heart sink.
 
	 
 
	Function band -
 
	 
 
	Tend to carry around larger PA and light systems.
 
	- As you are reach the more pro end, you factor in your own sound and lighting engineers (or hire them in).
 
	- You may carry around two desks (one foh, one monitoring)
 
	- You may carry around more pro wireless than your average band. Systems that tend to be 1k+ a unit. And that's for both mic and IEM units. Buying or hiring those doesn't come cheap. And then there's the shared mic license on top.
 
	- Set up time can be astronomical and may involve many early starts and soundchecks
 
	 
 
	Promotional material
 
	- Pro videos cost pro money, videographers, editing, colourists
 
	- Pro audio cost pro audio in the studio... with the cost of engineers, mastering etc
 
	 
 
	Clothes
 
	- Depending upon the band, there is a look that has to be adhered to. If you are doing an Abba band, you aren't going to get far without the outfits. I remember playing with an Elvis tribute. His clothes used to cost north of 2.5k an outfit. Function bands with everybody wearing matching suits... well, sometimes they have to be made because not everybody can fit in off the shelf for certain outfits... and a lot of time, the sort of things you see the top function bands wearing, aren't the sort of things you can just go into a shop and buy (they tend to be a bit ott spangly suits etc)
 
	 
 
	Additional costs
 
	- Accountancy, Insurance, vans (either bought or hired), rehearsals, storage costs, travels costs tend to be higher. Factor in food and accommodation for band. Also, people don't seem to realise that you can spend hours speaking to client in order to land the deal... and then hours to finalise all the details of the event (which experience will tell me are mostly wishful thinking as events never run to plan)
 
	 
 
	All these costs are passed onto the client or part absorbed (for example, you may lower costs if there is a particular reason that it would be beneficial to take the gig).
 
	 
 
	Function bands turn to be run as a means to earn a wage in a professional capacity. Therefore the attitude should match. Loading in, your appearance, you language, attitude etc... is always part of how you are representing yourself. You have to have a plan for everything... what happens if the van breaks down. What happens if covid hits you. The contract has to be fulfilled.
 
	 
 
	 
 
	Pub band -
 
	 
 
	Low risk.
 
	 
 
	Low financial input.
 
	 
 
	If I've got a date free and somebody was to ask would I like a gig playing a load of songs that are already in my repertoire for 50 quid and it's local, I'd probably consider it. All I have to do it turn up... maybe get introduced to some new players and build upon a network that could land me new work... well, there's worse things you could do to earn 50 quid.
 
	 
 
	I am sure there are loads of people that argue they put a lot of money into their pub appearances, rehearsals etc... but the key thing is, there's a load of people that don't. The fee doesn't tend to change whatever the pub band is turning up with.
 
	 
 
	Lots of players with a large repertoire can just sit in on a gig and busk it... and busk it a lot better than a lot of rehearsed bands. Even if a pub band has arrangements, give me a copy of the audio to listen to or the dots, I'll play it.
 
	 
 
	These folks complaining about fifty quids should spend their time working on getting better paying gigs than worrying about who's taking fifty quid gigs. On facebook, if the gig isn't for you, move on. Nobody taking a pub gig is "crippling" the industry. A pub is a pub. Pubs are never going to be able to pay function prices - nor should they - because the difference between the two is astronomical. And if you look at the differences between a pub band and a function... it's quite clear to see why function bands are the price they are (having said that, there are some function bands that are just taking the p1ss.)