EBS_freak

OK, I was joking when I said quo earlier.

<fixed tempo> Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. Likewise Hellzero, apologies for my misplaced quip. I had not intended to derail your thread, nor to offend you. I hope that you can accept my apology. </fixed tempo>

Now that's a prelude to pornography if I ever heard it... Hmm... "a prelude to pornography" sounds like the title to my next song...

Oh man, I just gone off to listen to it. My grandpa used to have this on an old 78 and I never clocked. What a moron! I prefer boring Bob's take on it though! At 1:17, I suddenly feel like I'm in the Lovebug movie.... It's not just me who hears the same vibe? Is it...?

Have you ever considered that the Internet.... is not for you?

Richard Slexia messing about on TOTP playbacks before it was cool.

Indeed - Tom Hark. I didn't include that one, based on the fact it was a cover, despite it being their err... breakout track.

Quo </thread>

As the title says... I was having a conversation with a mate about music that is fundamentally cheesy, or novelty based... but still has a certain amount of musicality, cleverness or/and credibility about it. Has anybody got some examples that they want to throw into the mix? I offer up one of the first tracks I came up with... The Piranhas with Zambezi. From you can tell from the get go, they are firmly placing themselves tongue in cheek in their appearance... but the song stands up... well imho anyway. Any other suggestions of songs that are on the cusp?

Your comment made me read the wiki page associated with the album. Found this little gem of a quote. "The music was too polite," Rick Parfitt later remarked of the album. "There was no weight behind what we were doing. The edge had gone; we weren't real anymore." It did confirm my suspicions of a Charvel deal too.

I think I hang out at different pubs, ones that aren't tobacco stained.

Enjoying about your experiences through the range. One thing that I will throw into the discussion pool though, is that the sound of an IEM can be influences by a global EQ across the aux out. Now while I understand that it's nice to have an IEM sounding "right" without any processing, the option is of course there. As for the band, well, I can't help you much on that one!

Lol!

Now we are talking. I'm very interesting to see how you get on with those quads.

You don’t sustain the album sales that GB has in today’s world if you aren’t musically talented. There’s more than enough people ready to pounce and take you down. The fact that he was writing a soundtrack that defined a generation kind of says it all. You may not like him or his music - but his credentials stack up and are underpinned by his success.

Notable omission of The Supremes.

Say You Will Be There will always be the pinnacle of Spice Girls pop. Well, for me at least.

Don't do it. You'll miss the headroom of the multi-driver ZS10. Headroom is king.

Shure SLX-D14 Downsides - not <£400, more like 600 quid... but hear me out. Upside - Digital (no compander that is associated with analogue systems) Low latency Not on 2.4Ghz or 5 Ghz frequencies... a lot, lot, lot, lot likely to be interrupted by wifi, phones etc. <- This is the killer point Discrete tuneable frequencies - more likely to play nicely with all the other wireless you may be using. <- This is another biggie Changeable batteries - so not return to manufacturer when the inbuilt battery goes south Can be used with lav mic if you ever need to... If not this, and the 2.4 ghz digital offerings are giving you headaches, go with @mike257's suggestion of the Sennheiser. OK, it's analogue - so it's latency is the lowest - but it has got a compander... but it's about as transparent a compander as you can get! Of course, this is urging on the side of going more "pro" - a lot of people have no problem with the Line 6 stuff, Boss, etc... Your mileage may vary!

@dave_bass5 - I need to catch up with your email, life has got all a bit nuts of late. Will fill you in. Anyway... Behind keys, if you aren't moving anywhere, and you don't care about the visual aspect of it... and you have problem with fit, then maybe get something like a pair of closed back DT770 32 ohm. Will give you lots of low end response and nice amounts of isolation given the closed back build. Great for home use and travelling etc too - no sound leakage so you don't cheese off other people that may be in the same room as you. If you are looking at a Shure 215 setup with P2, then the Beyers with a P2 will offer so so so so much more. But again, it depends if you are OK with the look on stage. Personally, I think it's quite cool - and they certainly will give you more sound wise until you start dropping some serious wedge on IEMs.

Next time try dropping it on their heads.

lil wayne. </thread> although personally, because this thread mostly seems to be about dropping in random players... I’m throwing Brent Mason into the mix.

Do Squiers have the same preamp, pickups and pickup placement as Bongos?

Umm. Ash. or maple. Or tulipwood.

There’s also a lot out there that sound like ash Fenders.