Chris2112

[quote name='risingson' post='1047005' date='Dec 4 2010, 12:58 AM']Not quite... note that I wasn't complaining about slap bass (why bother? People are going to do it anyway), but people insisting that basses must be demo-ed in order to show their slap capabilities. Why? It's not necessary. A bit of slap, maybe, but not a whole video's worth.[/quote] Don't get me wrong, I agree with your general complaint that there is more to demo-ing a bass in a video than just slapping on it. I was referring to the wider contingent, the 8th thumping, root noting, P bass holding collective who don't accept the evolution of bass beyond being a loud, farty and indistinct noise coming from an Ampeg. It takes all sorts, yet slap gets a particularly rough time. I think a lot of it is jealousy, as being a proficient slap player is quite a feat and it not something every can pull off.

The only thing worse than bad slap bass is bass players complaining about slap bass. It's not all about thumping 8th root notes on P basses but hey-ho, different vinegar strokes...

Benavente! What a blast from the past! I remember seeing those as one of the first "boutique" basses I had come across and I recall them having a bit of a following over on Talkbass. Never really heard much about them over here, just one of the many boutique basses popular in the US that never made the jump over here!

[quote name='warwickhunt' post='1046478' date='Dec 3 2010, 03:51 PM']If you do a search on here you'll find a few threads about waxing Warwicks so I won't bore you with how little I wax mine but one thing to say is that you shouldn't worry too much about waxing the neck. The oil in your hands should be sufficient to keep the neck from drying out and if you wax the neck and don't buff it ALL off then it will become sticky when the neck warms up as you play. I generally wipe the back of the neck with the same lemon oil that I put on the fingerboard whenever I change strings. If it doesn't 'look' dry then it is probably OK! [/quote] +1 As I mentioned in the other recent thread about waxing, I recall reading this tip from Dana B. Goods, who used to be the distributor for Warwick in the US. They said not to wax the neck as not only will your hand oil it quite capably, waxing on top of this will lead to a greasy neck, as mentioned, which is particularly noticeable over prolonged periods of playing. The wax will warm up and seep out of the neck, leading to an off-putting greasiness.

I've been using slap quite a bit lately as the band has been doing an instrumental jam over Thomas Dalby's "Hyperactive" tune with me slapping out the old synth line.

That Status Electro is what it's all about! Although seeing the second Lakland there is giving me GAS!

[quote name='ThomBassmonkey' post='1044981' date='Dec 2 2010, 01:04 PM']hehe, I have severe GAS for one of these, its a shame they never seem to come up 2nd hand.[/quote] I usually don't advocate buying new, but if you're looking for one and can't find any used Guitar Guitar could probably cut you a decent deal on one. Either that, or hit Guitar Guitar Newcastle, where they usually have loads of Sandbergs.

Dennis Chambers is amazing. For me, the highpoint of his playing is the CAB stuff with Bunny Brunel and Tony MacAlpine - talk about incredible fusion! The bass playing there is also superb, very tight and focused and with a lovely Ken Smith tone going on too! Excellent video!

Much like Mark King, I love to slap and I'm at my fastest in E...I guess most people are! Though I followed Stanley Clarke's advice (that he gave in the late 70's) and developed my skills in all keys. I can see why it would irritate some people in tone demos, but I like it. I do slap after all! And I think that slap can be a way of showing a bass's "base" tone in an easy an accessible light. The greater problem in these tone demo videos is usually the naff mic or amp thats been used to record them with!

Are you thinking of the Spector-core fretless one with the F hole and the piezo bridge?

[quote name='JTUK' post='1043658' date='Dec 1 2010, 12:17 PM']I think she ( Gaga ) ... is as mad as a box of frogs...but she sure knows how to work it.[/quote] Well, she's clearly very talented and very intelligent...but the whole "zany" thing is just a well honed marketing ploy designed to look like it isn't a marketing ploy.

Not sure whats going on with his tone there. It sounds way too wide and flabby, with no punch or focus whatsoever. Very disappointing.

This bassline is just "it" for me, and the classic Kubicki tone there is very nice too. Probably my favourite Stuart Hamm song, and the bass solo is incredible.

Having come to the conclusion that big, Musicman shaped humbuckers sound best I thik they should find their way into more basses!

[quote name='thisnameistaken' post='1040402' date='Nov 28 2010, 08:32 PM']Fortunately I don't have to choose between X Factor wannabees and Elton John cover versions, there is a ton of actually-good music I can listen to instead.[/quote] +1 I can't help but think this whole "lets beat the X Factor to #1" thing is incredibly lame. Who cares who is #1? It means nothing these days anyway. As for Ellie, I'm not sure what she has to do with Lady Gaga, but I don't think she has anywhere near that level of talent, but then I don't think there are many women around with the musical talent that she has. Apples and oranges anyway, but I'm certainly never going to say "This is a really good cover of an Elton John song, I think I'll listen to that".

Yamaha TRB's are definitely cool, although I'm not sure they look "quite right" in anything other than 6 string guise!

[quote name='Russ' post='1039496' date='Nov 28 2010, 01:15 AM']Stu's one hell of a player, but, let's face it, he's an endorsement whore. He's changed amp endorsements more regularly than some people change their pants. Certainly, in terms of profile, when you've had a Fender signature model, where else is there to go but down? But Washburn? Surely if he'd wanted a Fender-alike, he could have gone with Lakland or something?[/quote] He's hardly an endorsement whore. The gear he has endorsed he has stuck by for a long time, see below: Amps: In the 80's he used Hartke, and he continued that for a long time. Around the turn of the Millenium, he switched to Peavey. There was never a Peavey Stuart Hamm signature but he did promotional work and clinics for them. He then went back to Harkte, again using stock Hartke stuff. He's a good friend of Larry Hartke, and loves his amps. Basses: So in the 80's he's playing Kubicki basses and is a good friend of Phil Kubicki. When Fender buy Kubicki, they recognise Stu as Kubicki's highest profile player. After approximately 7/8 years playing Kubicki basses Fender offer to make Stu a signature bass since they've been in contact through the "Fender era" at Kubicki. Stu has a big hand in the design stage (I could bore you with stories about details as minute as why they chose Pau Ferro over ebony for the fretboard but I won't) and ends up having his name on the first signature bass that Fender made. Production continues for several years before Fender decides it would like to make a second Urge bass, this time more suited to the mainstream (hence the 34" scale). The second Urge bass is created, and goes on selling for a number of years. Fender then discontinue it. In 2001, Stu started using Washburn basses, namely an acoustic that appears on "Outbound". Having had nearly a decade of enjoyment from this bass, he gets a signature model made by Washburn. Having contacts in Washburn, he's played their electric basses for a while before getting a signature model. Strings: Stu has used GHS Boomers since the 80's, no signature string, just one brand he likes. etc etc So it's hardly fair to call Stu an endorsement whore. He puts his name to products he develops himself, and he gives them many years of use. He is not picking companies out of the ether. It'd be more fair to say that Mark King is an endorsement whore, but then the term "whore" cheapens it. Whats wrong with having companies wanting to put your name on their stuff? If we were good enough bassists that companies were begging us to give them signature models I'm sure we'd jump too!

Sadly, I find it very uninspiring...the shape does nothing for me and it all looks a bit plain.

[quote name='Musky' post='1038695' date='Nov 27 2010, 11:59 AM']And he actually seems to believe that Rickenbacker are purveyors of consistently high quality, top flight instruments! [/quote] Ignorance is bliss, eh? I don't suppose he gets a chance to try much else, otherwise the Ric design would have surely improved!

It looks a bit tacky with those black blocks, I would have preferred a rosewood board with dots for that "classic jazz" look.