bubinga5 Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 [quote name='Bassassin' post='951292' date='Sep 9 2010, 11:34 PM']Snoopy: [attachment=58513:snoopycut.jpg] Really can't see the point, apart from additional ugly & heavy. Jon.[/quote] im not a big SC fan either.. this is purely cosmetic though.bet there frickin solid as a rock though construction wise.... Quote
Dood Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 Headless Basses, Singlecuts, Silly multicolour paint jobs, aircraft landing strip sized fretboards and ones with too many strings Quote
thisnameistaken Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 [quote name='dood' post='951320' date='Sep 10 2010, 12:04 AM']Headless Basses, Singlecuts, Silly multicolour paint jobs, aircraft landing strip sized fretboards and ones with too many strings [/quote] You forgot fingerboard LEDs. Quote
Dood Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 [quote name='thisnameistaken' post='951335' date='Sep 10 2010, 12:14 AM']You forgot fingerboard LEDs. [/quote] He he he!!!! I did! Yup - Those too!! - and....and... swirly dot shapes... and ...umm.. nah.Can't think of anything else .. Active pickups!! and.. ramps!! [/coat] Quote
Brave Sir Robin Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 Having owned a Thumb BO 5 once, great sound, loved the looks and build, but an instrument of torture comfort wise, and soooo heavy! Quote
JTUK Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Alembics, and Status for a start. Probably Warwick as wel...they just don't look right. Anything headless.... Gibson don't make basses worth a candle and Rickenbackers, don't get me started. Funnily enough I really wanted one as a kid but as soon as I tried to play it knew it wasn't going to work. I can never look at one without laughing now.. Quote
Randy_Marsh Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Rics, Fender Jaguars, Les Paul Basses. One thing i've noticed that seems to be able to destroy a good looking bass is those bloody horrible Egg shaped Delano pickups. Quote
beardybass Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Anything with Stu Hamm, Billy Sheehan, or Jeff Berlin on the end of it. And Burnseseses. Quote
RhysP Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Fenders. Warwicks - ugliest range of basses ever IMO (with the exception of the Streamer & that's only because they "borrowed" the shape from Spector). Quote
niceguyhomer Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Danellectro basses. Anything pointy or spiky. Quote
waynepunkdude Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='Clarky' post='951211' date='Sep 9 2010, 10:25 PM']Even this Alembic, Wayne? [attachment=58509:alembic02.jpg] Yep its mine and I think its sex on legs, well with strings anyway[/quote] That's not a bad one, I hate the natural ones. Oh but those Gus basses, looks like there is 2 dildos coming out of them, ick. Quote
waynepunkdude Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='bubinga5' post='951297' date='Sep 9 2010, 11:40 PM']Would you play one for free Wayne? [/quote] Yeah, I've always said I'd be a sell out at the drop of a hat. Quote
hillbilly deluxe Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Overpriced Fender copies Anything with too many knobs and buttons Block neck Jazzes 70's Fenders Airline Map basses Quote
Clarky Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Agreed on Gus basses, they try too hard to be different in my view but end up looking like a "futuristic" guitar from a bad 1970s/80s sci fi film. And Enfield basses - what's with the fugly massive pickup? Quote
xilddx Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 (edited) Anything with more than four strings, big ugly single cuts, any Burns bass. And someone mentioned the Warwick Nobby Headless - it is indeed one of the most ridiculous looking things in the world. EDIT: I forgot Pedulla, a horrible, horrible cartoon of a bass design. Edited September 10, 2010 by silddx Quote
Fat Rich Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 (edited) Never liked the shape of Pedulla MVP / Buzz basses, looks like the horns could snap off. Probably a great sounding bass though but the one I tried had a neck like a base ball bat. Not a big fan of singlecuts, LEDs, f holes or ramps, but each to his own I guess. Didn't used to like headless basses but I'm sort of getting used to them. Edit: Great minds think alike! Although looking at the website most of their basses look OK, it's just the Buzz Edited September 10, 2010 by Fat Rich Quote
Musicman20 Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Headless/Status mainly. Some of the weirder Warwick designs. Quote
lemmywinks Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='Clarky' post='951197' date='Sep 9 2010, 10:13 PM']I am on record as saying Ritters look like Owen Wilson's nose ... and I stand by that [/quote] It's true! Rickys are horrible basses IMO, I also think Gus basses look a little silly Quote
charic Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='Fat Rich' post='951548' date='Sep 10 2010, 09:54 AM']Never liked the shape of Pedulla basses, looks like the horns could snap off. Probably a great sounding bass though but the one I tried had a neck like a base ball bat. Not a big fan of singlecuts, LEDs, f holes or ramps, but each to his own I guess. Didn't used to like headless basses but I'm sort of getting used to them. Edit: Great minds think alike![/quote] I only like the rapture but that is one beautiful bass! Quote
urb Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 Pretty much every bass that I don't own... But especially these: Quote
xilddx Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='urb' post='951597' date='Sep 10 2010, 10:37 AM']Pretty much every bass that I don't own... But especially these: [/quote] Ah, the awful Warwick Vampyre. The Entwistle Buzzard is even worse, that and the Reverso have the UGLIEST headstocks ever designed, they are truly disgusting to behold. Most Trabens look a bit daft too, with thos tribal tattoo style bridges. Quote
Chris2112 Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 [quote name='Clarky' post='951497' date='Sep 10 2010, 09:24 AM']Agreed on Gus basses, they try too hard to be different in my view but end up looking like a "futuristic" guitar from a bad 1970s/80s sci fi film.[/quote] Yeah, they definitely look absolutely dreadful. The thing is with the Warwick Vampyre, it just looks absolutely horrendous. I'm sure it'll appeal to 14 year old metal listeners though, hence why they made a Rockbass version! Quote
Truckstop Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 I hate solid colour guitars. I could never like a bass where I couldnt see the grain of the wood. Truckstop Quote
Kiwi Posted September 10, 2010 Posted September 10, 2010 My 2p: Wish basses. No amount of excuses about finishing can hide a total lack of aesthetic awareness. Burns basses. The styling is very fussy. Fenders are simpler, functional, elegant and look a load better by comparison. Any number of mutant Fender copies with musicman pickups and odd looking scratchplates made by US rednecks who can't tell the difference between weird and cool. Pretty much anything by Gibson apart from the Thunderbird Single cuts apart from the Fodera Beez Elite and the Marleaux Mbass Modulus Vertex Lodestone basses Rick Turner basses Atlansia basses Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.