E sharp Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Just bought a Micro Fuzz from Max . Awesome pedal (gonna do a mini review soon) . The problem I've got , isn't the pedal , but my sound . I haven't used much effects over the years , save for my G5 for Hysteria alone . I can now nail the sound with this little pedal , but when the drummer and then the band kick in , I'm completely lost in the mix . I realise that this is purely a frequency issue on my behalf , but was wondering about splitting the signal . What I'm asking is , is it possible to run it out of the unbalanced output (not the DI) from my amp , then to a channel in the PA , and just push up the volume for this song only ? Thus having my clean sound out of the amp and speaker , and the fuzz (with a mix , granted of the clean) out of the PA . This would then kick in the sound for this one song (or maybe another like say Deeper Underground) . So sort of splitting the bass sound with - normal , and then fuzz and bass into the PA , isolating the fuzz from my main sound . Is this a goer ? Or do you think that maybe DI pedal , with the bass back to the amp through the 'thru' , and an unbalanced 'out' into the fuzz , then the PA (being brought up volume wise just when needed) . This seems simple to me , but does anyone else do something like this ? Look forward for any advice , cheers Paul . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dood Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Hullo! My immediate thought wth running a fuzz straight in to the PA, is that it will sound harsh and could lack definition due to the PA's Tweeters. I'd be inclined to buy a loop pedal (or similar) that will allow you to plop the pedal in the usual place, and then blend the fuzz in with your normal bass tone. I use an MXR M80 exactly for this reason, it is designed so that you can EQ and mix dry bass with filthy dirt. You *could* try to tame it by running an EQ after the fuzz then in to the PA to round off the top end a bit and maybe boost the lower mids to simulate a speaker cabinet EQ curve. That should make it sound a bit more realistic. Though I would be inclined to go with a loop plan. It's completely normal to disappear in the mix with a guitar distortion pedal, as it removes all of your bottom end when you switch it in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil.i.stein Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 [quote name='E sharp' post='988554' date='Oct 14 2010, 10:36 PM']Just bought a Micro Fuzz from Max . Awesome pedal (gonna do a mini review soon) . The problem I've got , isn't the pedal , but my sound . I haven't used much effects over the years , save for my G5 for Hysteria alone . I can now nail the sound with this little pedal , but when the drummer and then the band kick in , I'm completely lost in the mix . I realise that this is purely a frequency issue on my behalf , but was wondering about splitting the signal . What I'm asking is , is it possible to run it out of the unbalanced output (not the DI) from my amp , then to a channel in the PA , and just push up the volume for this song only ? Thus having my clean sound out of the amp and speaker , and the fuzz (with a mix , granted of the clean) out of the PA . This would then kick in the sound for this one song (or maybe another like say Deeper Underground) . So sort of splitting the bass sound with - normal , and then fuzz and bass into the PA , isolating the fuzz from my main sound . Is this a goer ? Or do you think that maybe DI pedal , with the bass back to the amp through the 'thru' , and an unbalanced 'out' into the fuzz , then the PA (being brought up volume wise just when needed) . This seems simple to me , but does anyone else do something like this ? Look forward for any advice , cheers Paul .[/quote] not sure i get the full picture here, the G5 has two ouputs (synth only & mix), can you use these to achieve the same result ? or a boss LS-2 (cheap option) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisnameistaken Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I would rather get the mix right in the backline. All you need is a blender pedal, maybe with an active volume control on the loop return, to get the mix right between your fuzz and clean sound. A Boss LS-2 would be about the cheapest way of doing it, and it's a pretty useful swiss-army-knife pedal to have anyway, and I'm not just saying that because I have one for sale. Incidentally mine is for sale because Max replaced it with a high-quality two-channel mixer a few weeks back, but I'd been using the LS-2 for a couple of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Fly Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 [quote name='E sharp' post='988554' date='Oct 14 2010, 10:36 PM'](...) I can now nail the sound with this little pedal , but when the drummer and then the band kick in , I'm completely lost in the mix . (...)[/quote] If the problem is the position in the mix I am not sure sending the same signal to the PA will address the problem effectively. There are a few options that should help: - Use a [b]blend pedal[/b] to add some of the clean tone to the signal. E.g. with the Boss LS-2 or the [sfx] S&M. - Use a [b]cross-over[/b] to process only the high frequencies. It is the same principle of the blender but frequency-based. The [sfx] X&M should do the trick. - [b]EQ[/b] pedal after the Micro-Fuzz. I would recommend the EQ. Also because the Micro-Fuzz has already a sort of frequency-based processing and I am not sure adding a further layer would be as effective as a post-processing EQ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Jack Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I've got a similar situation, Paul. I love the sound of the sfx Micro-Fuzz but I use it when playing in a 3-piece and I lose too much of my fundamental sound. I bought the sfx S&M (see Max's suggestion, above) and it does an excellent job of blending in exactly as much fuzz as I want. Unfortunately, being a 2-loop pedal I feel as if I really should have a different effect in each loop, but that stops the "clean channel" effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisnameistaken Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 [quote name='Happy Jack' post='988851' date='Oct 15 2010, 09:16 AM']Unfortunately, being a 2-loop pedal I feel as if I really should have a different effect in each loop, but that stops the "clean channel" effect. [/quote] FWIW in the second side of my mixer I only have a Boss OC-2. So I can either mix a dry signal in or I can mix in a suboctave. It also means I can footswitch between soloed OC-2 suboctave or a mix of suboctave and clean (using the other channel of the mixer with no pedals active), or indeed a suboctave with something gnarly above it, without having to turn any knobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.