Vibrating G String Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 [quote name='Crazykiwi' post='1022089' date='Nov 12 2010, 05:40 PM']Who can say how much the sound of a specific instrument is finish and how much is wood/electronics/hardware?[/quote] Any one with an internet connection and the ability to post online. I'm more interested in someone who can demonstrate their claims without requiring faith in their abilities though. Quote
Kiwi Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 [quote name='Vibrating G String' post='1022151' date='Nov 13 2010, 07:49 AM']Any one with an internet connection and the ability to post online.[/quote] Thats not what I meant. What I meant was its not possible to isolate the contribution of so many different elements. Quote
Vibrating G String Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 [quote name='Crazykiwi' post='1022170' date='Nov 13 2010, 12:27 AM']Thats not what I meant. What I meant was its not possible to isolate the contribution of so many different elements.[/quote] That makes sense On a similar note, our eyes are our most precise sense, dig this optical illusion. [url="http://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/possibly-the-best-optical-ilusion-i-have-seen-all-year/"]http://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/2009/0...-seen-all-year/[/url] We can't even tell the difference between green and blue looking right at it. To assume we can hear the effects of a coat of paint or a wood species over a tiny wire seems ridiculous by comparison. Quote
xilddx Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 An ES-335 doesn't sound much different to a Les Paul when amplified, why would anyone think taking the paint off a Squier Strat would have any tangible effect? Quote
skankdelvar Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 (edited) [quote name='silddx' post='1021292' date='Nov 12 2010, 12:36 PM']Um I would posit that your cable makes more of a difference to your tone than paint ever could.[/quote] The very fine guitarist Mr Eric Johnson avers that he can hear the difference between different makes of battery in his effects pedals. Among the more excitable readers of certain guitar magazines this makes him a 'Tone-Meister'. Others remain to be convinced. For myself, the most noticeable tonal improvement I ever made was jacking the action up a bit. Less buzz and a tighter break angle over the bridge. Edited November 13, 2010 by skankdelvar Quote
Jean-Luc Pickguard Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 As everyone knows, the tone is in the fingers. I'm sure I can notice a subtle difference when I'm not wearing mittens. Quote
The Bass Doc Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 [quote name='skankdelvar' post='1022486' date='Nov 13 2010, 02:48 PM']jacking the action[/quote] That may well make a tonal improvement but apparently it's detrimental to the eyesight. Quote
risingson Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 Presumably this article is a joke? The effect of lacquer to the sonic properties of an instrument will be so, so minimal. Honestly, this guy would have better spent his time doing the big shop at Tesco rather than writing this article. Some people concern themselves more with the formulas on good tone rather than being a great player with a good instrument, it baffles me. Quote
skankdelvar Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 (edited) TBH, a lot of these urban myths sprang up in the 70's when people could [i]genuinely [/i]hear a difference between old electrics and new ones but - lacking the wonderful Internetz - didn't really know why. We were dim in those days and seized on any outlandish proposition in our hunt for tone. So we attributed it all to the paint. These days we know all about pot values, pick-up winds and fret material. We are so much better informed Edited November 13, 2010 by skankdelvar Quote
Mr. Foxen Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 [quote name='skankdelvar' post='1022528' date='Nov 13 2010, 03:31 PM']fret material.[/quote] No-one brought that up yet. What have you begun? Quote
northstreet Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 Anyone else noticed a difference depending on whether the electricity in the venue is supplied by nPower or Eon? Quote
MoonBassAlpha Posted November 15, 2010 Author Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='risingson' post='1022506' date='Nov 13 2010, 03:02 PM'][font="Arial Black"]Presumably this article is a joke?[/font] The effect of lacquer to the sonic properties of an instrument will be so, so minimal. Honestly, this guy would have better spent his time doing the big shop at Tesco rather than writing this article. Some people concern themselves more with the formulas on good tone rather than being a great player with a good instrument, it baffles me.[/quote] He's a German, and an audiophile. The chances of it being a joke are miniscule! Quote
xilddx Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1024588' date='Nov 15 2010, 01:29 PM']He's a German, and an audiophile. The chances of it being a joke are miniscule! [/quote] Quote
stevie Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1024588' date='Nov 15 2010, 01:29 PM']He's a German, and an audiophile. The chances of it being a joke are miniscule! [/quote] I hasten to add that the emphasis here is on audiophile and not on German. After all, we are all Europeans here, nicht wahr? Quote
stevie Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='Vibrating G String' post='1022192' date='Nov 13 2010, 09:27 AM'][url="http://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/possibly-the-best-optical-ilusion-i-have-seen-all-year/"]http://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/2009/0...-seen-all-year/[/url][/quote] Whaaaaaaah..... that is indubitably the best optical illusion I have seen - ever. I'm still debating whether to believe it. Quote
fingerz Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 Thick Poly lacquers protect the body best, it makes sense to coat a body in the stuff when mass producing. Cellulose lets the wood age easier but isn't so protective as it's thin and can go wrong easily when applying - so is not so common... I think a good sounding instrument can have either finish IME. But it does make sense to have timbers that can age and improve over time for me, if you can be careful with the finish that is! Minefield Quote
risingson Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1024588' date='Nov 15 2010, 01:29 PM']He's a German, and an audiophile. The chances of it being a joke are miniscule! [/quote] It certainly explains the protracted and fatiguing attention to detail Quote
LawrenceH Posted November 15, 2010 Posted November 15, 2010 Tapping against the alder body of my MIM jazz with and without the rather thick polyester finish on (see build diary!) I thought I could hear a difference in the top end. Since putting the new finish on took so long compared to stripping it, I can't really say whether it has changed again. And I don't know if that difference translated to the amplified output. I remain firmly on the fence. Quote
matski Posted November 16, 2010 Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='northstreet' post='1023622' date='Nov 14 2010, 06:25 PM']Anyone else noticed a difference depending on whether the electricity in the venue is supplied by nPower or Eon?[/quote] No, but I do find that if my bass is correctly lined up with the Earth's magnetic field I get better top-end clarity. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.