Bassman1974 Posted February 14, 2024 Posted February 14, 2024 26 minutes ago, AMV001 said: That bridge looks to be slightly further forward than the standard Ric bridge. Is the V2 bridge smaller? I've really no idea regarding specs for the earlier 4003's. This one is a 2023 model Quote
prowla Posted February 14, 2024 Posted February 14, 2024 4 hours ago, AMV001 said: That bridge looks to be slightly further forward than the standard Ric bridge. Is the V2 bridge smaller? I don't like that so much - it's like they've copied the Chickenbackers. I think they moved the position of the neck-body join. Quote
AMV001 Posted February 14, 2024 Posted February 14, 2024 5 hours ago, prowla said: I don't like that so much - it's like they've copied the Chickenbackers. I think they moved the position of the neck-body join. I thought it looked different, but also thought that it was maybe just the angle of the photo. Now you mention it though, the last fret looks like it doesn't hang over the body, like the earlier models, so you could be right. The 21 fret versions have a similar bridge position too. Quote
Simon C Posted February 15, 2024 Posted February 15, 2024 On 14/02/2024 at 13:39, prowla said: I don't like that so much - it's like they've copied the Chickenbackers. I think they moved the position of the neck-body join. I've done some adjustment on mine: intonation, action and string spacing. It was easy to adjust - I'd heard the older bridges were more difficult (but have never had the pleasure). I'd have liked to get the action a little lower (or at least tried with it a little lower) but can't lower the E string any further at the bridge. I think it is more to do with depth of the nut slot on the E string though, rather than just being a bridge limitation. So I'm going to play the bass for a while longer before deciding whether I want the nut slot cut a little lower or not. Mine will get its 1st outing tonight: Jam Night at McAfferty's Epsom. Quote
prowla Posted February 15, 2024 Posted February 15, 2024 4 hours ago, Simon C said: I've done some adjustment on mine: intonation, action and string spacing. It was easy to adjust - I'd heard the older bridges were more difficult (but have never had the pleasure). I'd have liked to get the action a little lower (or at least tried with it a little lower) but can't lower the E string any further at the bridge. I think it is more to do with depth of the nut slot on the E string though, rather than just being a bridge limitation. So I'm going to play the bass for a while longer before deciding whether I want the nut slot cut a little lower or not. Mine will get its 1st outing tonight: Jam Night at McAfferty's Epsom. Yep - I think they're a nice unit and may get them on a couple of my basses. The issue is with the bass itself - they've moved the end of the body out so there's a gap after the tailpiece. 1 Quote
Bassman1974 Posted February 15, 2024 Posted February 15, 2024 On 14/02/2024 at 19:39, AMV001 said: I thought it looked different, but also thought that it was maybe just the angle of the photo. Now you mention it though, the last fret looks like it doesn't hang over the body, like the earlier models, so you could be right. The 21 fret versions have a similar bridge position too. A better angle here on a '23 maybe.. Quote
King Tut Posted February 16, 2024 Posted February 16, 2024 Taking my 77 Burgundyglow to a gig tonight. Porn to follow! Quote
AMV001 Posted February 16, 2024 Posted February 16, 2024 (edited) 10 hours ago, Bassman1974 said: A better angle here on a '23 maybe.. Yep, looks like the position has been changed. Check out the neck/body joint and the fact that the scratchplate is much closer to the end of the body on the '23. Apologies for the dust, by the way, haven't had the chance to pick it up much over the past couple of weeks... Edited February 16, 2024 by AMV001 Quote
Simon C Posted February 16, 2024 Posted February 16, 2024 (edited) This was our closing song from my Ric’s 1st night out - last night’s Jam Night at McCafferty’s Epsom. I think the videographer (Mrs C) did a good job of getting it front and centre. It got plenty of attention from the other bassists, with also some “ooh a Ricky - nice” type observations from the guitarists and one of the drummers Edited February 17, 2024 by Simon C 3 Quote
King Tut Posted February 17, 2024 Posted February 17, 2024 Ricks for main and support acts last night. Me on the left hamming it up with support band ‘Thr3e’s’ Dom Rentle. Not sure what Dom’s is but mines a 77 Burgundyglo 4001. 3 Quote
Skybone Posted February 17, 2024 Posted February 17, 2024 Looks like a 4003W, like Simon C's, but with a nice mirror 'plate. Quote
AMV001 Posted February 17, 2024 Posted February 17, 2024 23 minutes ago, Skybone said: Looks like a 4003W, like Simon C's, but with a nice mirror 'plate. No skunk stripe though, and what is the deal with the TRC? Chickenbacker perhaps? Quote
prowla Posted February 17, 2024 Posted February 17, 2024 (edited) 5 hours ago, AMV001 said: No skunk stripe though, and what is the deal with the TRC? Chickenbacker perhaps? It’s not a Chickenbacker. Edited February 17, 2024 by prowla Quote
King Tut Posted February 17, 2024 Posted February 17, 2024 5 hours ago, AMV001 said: No skunk stripe though, and what is the deal with the TRC? Chickenbacker perhaps? Truss Rod Cover and scratch plate came from his band mate’s bass that his mate played in the band ‘Tobruk’ apparently! Quote
Skybone Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 The skunk stripe in the 4003 is only a very recent addition. 1 Quote
Dicey Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 My 4003 on tour yesterday. The tone through an Ampeg SVT is 🔥 🔥🔥 5 Quote
prowla Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 1 hour ago, Dicey said: My 4003 on tour yesterday. The tone through an Ampeg SVT is 🔥 🔥🔥 That'll do nicely! Quote
msb Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 On 18/02/2024 at 05:55, Skybone said: The skunk stripe in the 4003 is only a very recent addition. That’s a 77 4001 , that burgundy glo is not all that translucent. But it would be there. Quote
Skybone Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 1 hour ago, msb said: That’s a 77 4001 , that burgundy glo is not all that translucent. But it would be there. The '77 Burgundyglo will definitely have a skunk stripe, however, the 4003W does not, because it is a more recent model. Though I have noticed that it is now a feature of the 2023 on models of 4003, at least the one's that I've seen online. Quote
msb Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 You can just see it through the burgundy here Quote
Simon C Posted February 25, 2024 Posted February 25, 2024 On 24/02/2024 at 14:02, Skybone said: The '77 Burgundyglo will definitely have a skunk stripe, however, the 4003W does not, because it is a more recent model. Though I have noticed that it is now a feature of the 2023 on models of 4003, at least the one's that I've seen online. On the previous page of this thread there are some picture of my walnut 4003. If the skunk strip is the stripe running down the middle of the neck, then it does have a skunk stripe. It is a 2022 model. Quote
Skybone Posted February 25, 2024 Posted February 25, 2024 25 minutes ago, Simon C said: On the previous page of this thread there are some picture of my walnut 4003. If the skunk strip is the stripe running down the middle of the neck, then it does have a skunk stripe. It is a 2022 model. They must have reinstated them for the 2022 model. Quote
AMV001 Posted March 2, 2024 Posted March 2, 2024 Going back to the comments earlier about the new bridge position. Regardless of whether you like the colour of this instrument or not (that's another discussion) here's a good example of how it spoils the look. That gap in the binding is usually hidden by the tailpiece but with the whole assembly moved forward it just makes the guitar look unfinished IMHO. 1 Quote
prowla Posted March 2, 2024 Posted March 2, 2024 2 hours ago, AMV001 said: Going back to the comments earlier about the new bridge position. Regardless of whether you like the colour of this instrument or not (that's another discussion) here's a good example of how it spoils the look. That gap in the binding is usually hidden by the tailpiece but with the whole assembly moved forward it just makes the guitar look unfinished IMHO. Yep - I wouldn't buy a new one for that reason. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.