cytania Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Anyone here routinely removed paint finishes? Reason I ask is that in my highly unscientific researches I've got the impression that natural finishes cost more, presumably because cosmeticly nice wood is favoured? So when a solid paint job is stripped back do you find horrors like knot holes, mismatched woods? I'm thinking modern mass market basses not vintage Fullerton stuff here. Does any of it make a difference tonally or should that filler be laddled in? Quote
Doctor J Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 They never went out of their way to select nice looking wood in Fullerton either. Quote
Cat Burrito Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Here are two formally black 1970s Fenders that I have stripped You can be unlucky, it depends on the bass & there is no real way of telling what you will get. I'd avoid cheaper basses personally. Tonally, the difference is minimal but you really bond with the instrument doing it & I found it very satisfying. Quote
TheGreek Posted January 3, 2011 Posted January 3, 2011 Personally I prefer a natural finish - however there are many reasons why basses are painted - sometimes the bodies aren't one piece, sometimes because the grain under the paint doesn't really cut it. Found this out when we stripped my fretless Veillette Citron - because the natural finish wasn't quite good enough we ended up staining it green which is my favourite colour. Looks OK I think.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.