Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Technical info and other ramblings


alexclaber
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm taking advantage of my current condition to get on top of not only the thrilling paperwork I generally avoid but also some R&D I've been meaning to do, and writing some more articles to address this, that and t'other that I see getting discussed on forums but rarely getting resolved.

The first one is here: [url="http://barefacedbass.com/technical-information/mythbusters1.htm"] Mythbusters #1 - Amplifiers[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1086331' date='Jan 12 2011, 02:13 AM']What is 'crest factor'?

It is probably maths, that they tried to teach me in school, but did it without context.[/quote]

[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote]Truth #3 - You will never blow woofers or mid-bass drivers, i.e. the 8"/10"/12"/15"/18" speakers found in a bass cab, because your amp isn't powerful enough.[/quote]

Heh, I misread this initially as having meaning synonymous to "no amp is powerful enough to blow woofers or mid-bass drivers". Which is clearly nonsense, but that second comma does introduce a certain ambiguity.

S.P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stylon Pilson' post='1086818' date='Jan 12 2011, 03:49 PM']Heh, I misread this initially as having meaning synonymous to "no amp is powerful enough to blow woofers or mid-bass drivers". Which is clearly nonsense, but that second comma does introduce a certain ambiguity.

S.P.[/quote]


+1, I had a double take on that! :)

Nice piece though. Probably the most informative manufacturer website out there. I feel like I actually learn something every time I read it! :)

Hope the ankle recovers soon Alex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is how I understand Crest Factor. I may be utterly misguided.

Imagine a drummer doing a constant roll on the snare drum. That establishes a sound level that is fairly constant. Now if he or she were to introduce rim shots every now and again, there will be a peak increase in sound level per rimshot. Make these rimshots louder and you are increasing the crest factor. The peak level in comparison with the 'average' level has increased.

With crest factor, it's the rms level and peak levels that are compared in the form of a ratio. I guess a compressor/limiter reduces crest factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'll write something on crest factor with respect to bass guitar. There's quite a lot to cover. But on the Claber scale of quick and dirty crest factor then:

Violently slapping a sparse bassline on my RIM with Q-Tuners (passive pickups with zero compression) through Avalon U5 (extremely high headroom preamp) = highest crest factor that's possible from a bass guitar (maybe 1000:1 or 30dB or more)
Live bass playing, no compression = typical bass guitar crest factor (between 10:1 and 20:1, 10-20dB)
Straight 8ths with the same bassist playing the same thing as below, but live instead of studio = lowest normal live crest factor (somewhere between 4:1 and 10:1, 6-10dB)
Heavily produced recorded straight 8ths with lots of compression = lowest normal crest factor (somewhere between 2:1 and 4:1, 3-6dB)
Playing constant notes, no rests or muting, through a Big Muff with all the controls cranked = lowest crest factor that's possible from bass guitar (probably almost 1:1 or 0dB)

The snare roll example is a good one - just bear in mind that the extra rimshots not only raise the peak level but also the average level - so the less frequent but louder the rimshots, the greater the crest factor.

Turning up your treble will increase the crest factor whilst turning up the bass will decrease the crest factor. Adding compression or limiting will decrease the crest factor. Adding distortion will decrease the crest factor. Plucking closer to the bridge will decrease the crest factor. Plucking harder will increase the crest factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Clipping only increases the power output at higher frequencies"

But the RMS voltage of a sine wave is about 0.7 of its peak value, whereas the RMS voltage of a square wave is the same as its peak value. So a square wave of a given peak voltage has an RMS value 1.4 times that of a sine wave of the same peak value. Surely that results in a doubling of power (I^2 x R)? At least in an ideal world with an ideal power supply.

OK, I'm talking pretty severe clipping here - bags of level into a sensitive input - and an amp running into a purely resistive load. I've only ever tested this into a dummy load as I've always had intolerant neighbours :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dincz' post='1087906' date='Jan 13 2011, 01:06 PM']"Clipping only increases the power output at higher frequencies"

But the RMS voltage of a sine wave is about 0.7 of its peak value, whereas the RMS voltage of a square wave is the same as its peak value. So a square wave of a given peak voltage has an RMS value 1.4 times that of a sine wave of the same peak value. Surely that results in a doubling of power (I^2 x R)? At least in an ideal world with an ideal power supply.

OK, I'm talking pretty severe clipping here - bags of level into a sensitive input - and an amp running into a purely resistive load. I've only ever tested this into a dummy load as I've always had intolerant neighbours :)[/quote]

But if you run a Fourier Transform on that square wave you'll see that the additional energy is entirely made up of higher frequency overtones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='alexclaber' post='1087959' date='Jan 13 2011, 02:42 PM']But if you run a Fourier Transform on that square wave you'll see that the additional energy is entirely made up of higher frequency overtones.[/quote]

OK the fog is clearing. Of course it makes sense that there's nothing below the fundamental. It's just so tempting to see "alternating DC" in a square wave.

But what about this:
"Clipping does not cause square waves"

Can't quite get my head around that.

Edited by dincz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dincz' post='1088224' date='Jan 13 2011, 04:05 PM']OK the fog is clearing. Of course it makes sense that there's nothing below the fundamental. It's just so tempting to see "alternating DC" in a square wave.

But what about this:
"Clipping does not cause square waves"

Can't quite get my head around that.[/quote]

I think that is the lack of vertical bit, like you need two lines to make a right angle, and it ain't a square without one. So it is just a flat topped wave, not a square one like you can do with synths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1088229' date='Jan 13 2011, 05:10 PM']I think that is the lack of vertical bit, like you need two lines to make a right angle, and it ain't a square without one. So it is just a flat topped wave, not a square one like you can do with synths.[/quote]

OK, not perfect square waves with infinitely short risetimes, but definitely squarISH. A synth (or anything else) won't produce a perfect square wave either but an amp with good HF response and slew rate would surely produce as good an approximation as a synth, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Alex these are very good articles, but going back to what I said to you before, I think they would be even better if it linked to (separate) graphs/figures illustrating some of the points!
Teaching scientific/technical stuff I've found some people are very visual in their understanding and will find that easier no matter how clear the prose - it also gives a great solid point of reference for otherwise interminable internet discussions :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LawrenceH' post='1092077' date='Jan 17 2011, 01:24 AM']Hi Alex these are very good articles, but going back to what I said to you before, I think they would be even better if it linked to (separate) graphs/figures illustrating some of the points!
Teaching scientific/technical stuff I've found some people are very visual in their understanding and will find that easier no matter how clear the prose - it also gives a great solid point of reference for otherwise interminable internet discussions :)[/quote]

You're quite right of course but it takes me ten times as long to do the illustrations as to write an article - so the visual learners will have to miss out for now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...