Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Hi(gh) Heel(ed) Sneakers - we've had a CEASE AND DISIST email


Funkmaster
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello lowdowners

The Welsh T Band have recieved the following email purporting to be from the publisher and legal representative of the late Tommy Tucker's estate.

[i]We are DELO'Music Entertainment Publishing Administration Group LLP (DEPAG, LLP), publisher for all intellectual property masters, soundrecordings, works for the Robert Higginbotham/Tommy Tucker estate. Please comply with the letter to "cease and disist" using our works without applying for a license through DEPAG, LLP. Thank you!

[u][b]CEASE & DESIST[/b][/u]

Dear Welsh T Band Members and Legap Representative

It has come to our attention that you have made an unauthorized use of our copyrighted wort entitled [b]"Hi(gh) Heel(ed) Sneakers" [/b](the "work") in the preparation of a work derived therefrom. We have reserved all rights in the Work, first published in 1963/4, and have registered copyright therein. Your work entitled [b]"High Heel Sneakers"[/b] is essentially identical the Work and clearly used the Work as its basis. (Words and music) As you neither asked for nor recieved permission to use the Work as the basis for [b]"High Heel Sneakers"[/b] nor to make or distribute copies, including electronic copies, digital copies, physical copies of same, we believe you have willfully infringed my rights under 17 U.S,C, Section 101 et seq, and could be liable for statutory damages as high as $150,000 as set forth in Section 5044©(92) therein.

We demand that the [b]Welsh T Band [/b]immediately cease the use and distribution of all infringing works derived from the Work, and all copies, including electronic copies, digital copies and physical copies of same, that you deliver to me, if applicable, all unused, undistributed copies of same, or destroy such copies immediately and that you desist from this or any other infringement of our rights in teh future. If we have not recieved a response from you by April 25 2011 indicating that you have fully complied with these requirements, we shall take further action against you.

Kind regards

Richard Higginbotham
DEPAG, LLP
220 montgomery Avenue
Suite 133
Springfield, Ohio 45506[/i]

High Heeled Sneakers is often part of our live set - I had, mistakenly perhaps always believed the venue's PRS license covered the songs played there. It was also on a live CD that we used to give to venues to try to get more work. A few fans got copies of the CD too.

The only other place I know there's a Welsh T Band version is on YouTube. it was filmed and posted by someone who was in the audience. I've no idea who and it's not something we have a hope of controling ourself. (And YouTube have license agreements too - I know that thanks to the PRS cheques I get every three months for people who use my published "works"!

A bit spooked about this. I've asked the Musician's Union for advice - but I wondered if anyone here had any experience of anything similar and how it was resolved.

Thanks for any info

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Funkmaster' post='1199116' date='Apr 14 2011, 10:18 AM']We demand that the [b]Welsh T Band [/b] ... deliver to me, if applicable, all unused, undistributed copies of same[/quote]

Download every version of High Heeled Sneakers you can find from soulseek or similar. Email the mp3s to them one at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can pretty much play what you like 'live' and put it on CDs that are given away free for 'promo'. It's only if you sell 'product' with the recording on that you will get into murky waters....
For clarification ring PRS Membership Dept or continue your contact with the MU.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Funkmaster' post='1199116' date='Apr 14 2011, 10:18 AM']High Heeled Sneakers is often part of our live set - I had, mistakenly perhaps always believed the venue's PRS license covered the songs played there.[/quote]

It [b]is[/b] covered under the PRS licence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MU will give you the best advice.

From my understanding the problem has arisen because the sender of the letter thinks that you are passing off your cover (you are doing it as a cover and not as a derivative work? - have you changed the lyrics at all?) as an original work because the title is different.

Also you're not supposed to sell CDs with cover versions on them without paying the appropriate MCPS fees. Have you done this?

Edited by BigRedX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a heart palpitating second I thought it said:

High Heeled [b]Snickers[/b]

I shall be issuing a formal denial through the usual channels. Now then.... Clifford K.... Clifford L.... Ah yes, Clifford M.....

Edit: PS - on the face of it, it doesn't look like there is anything major to worry about. Getting advice from the MU is a good idea, and it may be worth politely asking the issuers to prove ID and that they have authority to issue the notice. Hope it all turns out OK.

Edited by ShergoldSnickers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think BigRedX has nailed the point. The legal beagle obviously thinks you've ripped off the song to use it as the basis for an original.

It strikes me as rather odd that in his view your version is - "essentially identical". Has he never heard of 'cover versions'? I think that this point should be put to him in a friendly sort of way, along with refs to UK law in re Promo CD's and an assurance that yours is in no way an original nor does it claim to be.

Once he's accepted this, solicit his permission to use his observations as a testimonial - e.g.

[quote][b]"Your version ... of Hi-Heel Sneakers ... is essentially identical"[/b] - Richard Higginbotham for the Tommy Tucker Estate[/quote]

Everyone's a winner, baby!

Edited by skankdelvar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify - You are a band doing gigs and Hi Heel Sneakers is part of your setlist...that's it?

I do find the email a little strange. Half the bands in the world have played this song at sometime or other.
I certainly wouldn't "appease them verbally and carry on playing it." In my experience, it doesn't pay trying to be smart.

Edited by SteveK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the BMI website, these are the publishers: [url="http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=564186&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID"]http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWri...uerytype=WorkID[/url]

As others have said, if you are performing the song and reporting it to PRS then there should be no problem. Selling it will become an issue. The only other thing they can give you hassle about is making changes to the song - which they may feel you have by altering the title.

Not a music lawyer but worked on the licensing side in record companies for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If memory serves, High Heeled Sneakers is itself a worthless and totally derivitive song - just another reworking of a standard 12-bar blues. If I could be bothered, I bet I could find half a dozen earlier works that are indistinguishable. I wonder how much that lawyer's letter cost.

Still, I find it quite wonderful that little Tommy Tucker is threatening to sue you! :) You'll be able to tell that story to your grandchildren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='stevie' post='1199296' date='Apr 14 2011, 12:36 PM']Still, I find it quite wonderful that little Tommy Tucker is threatening to sue you! :) You'll be able to tell that story to your grandchildren.[/quote]

You shouldn't mock - he was a true pro of the old school, having to sing for his supper if the reports are to be believed. Further, his efforts would often secure him only a very modest meal of white bread and butter. Unable to afford even a knife with which to cut said meal, it is possible that his poor financial prospects were responsible for his failure to find a wife.

Edited by Earbrass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='misrule' post='1199156' date='Apr 14 2011, 10:42 AM']I reckon it's a joke -- there are too many spelling errors.[/quote]

Dunno about it being a "joke", but it certainly doesn't read like it was written by any decent (sic) lawyer.

The confusion seems to have stemmed from the (perceived) change to the title. They call it "High Heeled Sneakers", you call it "Hi Heel Sneakers". Potayto/Potarto...

Maybe they think that you are trying to rip them off by selling copies of a song that is clearly (in their eyes) bearing a title too close to theirs...

As far as what to do about it? I think you are right to seek further clarification from those "in the know".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I just note that, when you Google DEPAG LLP or "DELO'Music Entertainment Publishing Administration Group", this thread is the third highest entry.

I found two quick entries, one for a Rick Hick who was their CEO until 2008 and this Richard Higginbotham chap, who is now listed as a 'publisher' with said organisation. I have never known a professional organisation to maintain such a low profile.

Searching the address brings back the 'Grayhill Apartments', of which 'Suite 133' appears to be a number. I trust the neighbourhood looks better in the flesh, as Streetview merely dims it's glammer.

Make of it what you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gust0o' post='1199394' date='Apr 14 2011, 01:44 PM']I found two quick entries, one for a Rick Hick who was their CEO until 2008 and this Richard Higginbotham chap, who is now listed as a 'publisher' with said organisation.[/quote]
It would defy belief that Mr Rick Hick and Mr Richard Higginbotham are in any way the same person. Or that DEPAG LLP does not occupy a sizeable operating footprint within Suite 133, Grayhill Apartments.

For some reason I am reminded of 'Ozymandias' by Mr Percy Bysshe Shelley.

Edited by skankdelvar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it off the CD.. as a song you aren't missing much.

Tell them that is what you have done and it is covered by PRS.

Tell them this in as many little snippets of info as you can..as it will use up quite a few lawyers letters their side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JTUK' post='1199489' date='Apr 14 2011, 02:59 PM']Tell them this in as many little snippets of info as you can..as it will use up quite a few lawyers letters their side.[/quote]

If they were using an external lawyer, why not - it appears they're representing themselves, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JTUK' post='1199489' date='Apr 14 2011, 02:59 PM']Take it off the CD.. as a song you aren't missing much.

Tell them that is what you have done and it is covered by PRS.

Tell them this in as many little snippets of info as you can..as it will use up quite a few lawyers letters their side.[/quote]

+1

The essence seems to be that you're ok for PRS playing live, and perhaps using as a demo (as long as it's very narrowly defined distribution, ie to promoters). But, if you've recorded the song and distributed it, you need mechanical rights via MCPRS, and that you don't have.

All you need to do is deny that you ever distributed recorded versions other than for promotional purposes. You have no copies left.

Edited by fatback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...