Stacker Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 [quote name='4000' post='1232727' date='May 16 2011, 09:12 AM']If you've had a standard Rick 4001 or 4003 with binding and high-gains, these sound a little different. Lovely bass BTW. Oh, and I believe the necks got bigger around '97, although fellow Rick Resourcers would no doubt correct me. I had a '96 CS with a very thin neck and a '98 V63 with a very chunky neck.[/quote] True! The CS is the same 'footprint' as the V63 and, like you, I have owned both with the same features as you describe. I'll never understand why RIC did that: fatten the neck and make the 'cresting wave' shorter. This also makes the pre '96-'97 CS more sought-after than the later ones with the fatter neck. My current V63 is just like this fella, great colour. Have a Sunday bump on me.
squire Posted May 29, 2011 Author Posted May 29, 2011 (edited) Cheers mate. [size=1](As I don't have a Feedback profile here, I'll do everything to make it a trustfully transaction. Scan of my ID-card and stuff.)[/size] Edited May 29, 2011 by squire
.jpg.518c69c2d9e1581799f3c11301dc2da5.jpg)
Recommended Posts