danweb22 Posted October 26, 2011 Posted October 26, 2011 (edited) Just wondered if anyone on here with Dingwall AB1 experience has tried the active and passive versions? Did you think it made a big difference? Were there more useful tones from the active? or is the passive good enough? Is the active worth the extra money? Thanks in advance! Edited October 26, 2011 by danweb22 Quote
PTB Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 I had a Dingwall for a few months this year. It was a passive AB1 but the previous owner had added an EMG pre-amp. This was hissy so I replaced the vol knob with a push/push to select active or passive. Once that was done, I preferred the passive sound - but not enough to keep the bass. Quote
danweb22 Posted October 27, 2011 Author Posted October 27, 2011 ok, I have heard that the passive AB1 sounds like an active output wise and I suppose an amp has a preamp so probably no need for the active! (and it would save about £200!!) Quote
swanbrook Posted October 28, 2011 Posted October 28, 2011 Don't know about the ab1 but I played a abz which was passive and it blew me away! Them pick ups are hot for a passive bass. I went for a abII in the end just because I got a killer deal. Quote
Happy Jack Posted October 28, 2011 Posted October 28, 2011 Paging Grand Wazoo! Paging Grand Wazoo! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.