Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

[quote name='Rick's Fine '52' timestamp='1334878284' post='1623007']
That is my idea of hell!!!

Theres nothing wrong with the response and tone of old basses!!
[/quote]

It was quite fun trying to work out what your idea of hell would be to be honest... there were a few options but this got it in the end.
They probably aren't bad basses- just everyone who wants one ends up doing mark king impersonations.

Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334878714' post='1623017']
It was quite fun trying to work out what your idea of hell would be to be honest... there were a few options but this got it in the end.
They probably aren't bad basses- just everyone who wants one ends up doing mark king impersonations.
[/quote]

I'm sure they're great basses, just horrific to look at, and if its the one without a headstock, then it's even worse, snow shovel with strings. Arrrrgggghhh!!!

Don't get me started on my idea of hellish basses, we'd be here forever, and I'd probably offend everyone on here!! :lol:

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Rick's Fine '52' timestamp='1334878993' post='1623023']
I'm sure they're great basses, just horrific to look at, and if its the one without a headstock, then it's even worse, snow shovel with strings. Arrrrgggghhh!!!

Don't get me started on my idea of hellish basses, we'd be here forever, and I'd probably offend everyone on here!! :lol:
[/quote]
well to balance it out, I can't stand the look of P basses pre 1957. There I said it. :P

Edited by LukeFRC
Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334879248' post='1623030']
well to balance it out, I can't stand the look of P basses pre 1958. There I said it. :P
[/quote]

GET OUT!!

Posted

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1334879329' post='1623032']
GET OUT!!
[/quote] hey you nicked the pickup and contours off the later P design for your bass. Still have the silly small headstock though :D

Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334879474' post='1623036']
Still have the silly small headstock though :D
[/quote]

Ooooooh! You're raising the temperature of my urine to more than 100 degrees Celsius!

Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334879248' post='1623030']
I can't stand the look of P basses pre-1958. There I said it. :P
[/quote]

Hang on a minute... you've got a Precision 57 RI in your sig, you bloody hypocrite! :huh:

Posted

be careful, that's going to rise your bladder pressure too.... it could explode and make everything the same colour as one of those..... I'll stop. :D

Posted

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1334879755' post='1623041']
Hang on a minute... you've got a Precision 57 RI in your sig, you bloody hypocrite! :huh:
[/quote]

crap... I was one year out wasn't I, quick edit....

Posted

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1334879755' post='1623041']
Hang on a minute... you've got a Precision 57 RI in your sig, you bloody hypocrite! :huh:
[/quote]whattdayatalkingabout? huh?

Posted

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1334880044' post='1623049']
Too late mate, I quoted you on it! :P
[/quote]
yeah but.... trying to think of something different on my RI to the original...... yeah well I'm pretty sure mine is the later update of the P bass.... with Metric screws and hex keys! wooo

Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334880170' post='1623051']
yeah but.... trying to think of something different on my RI to the original...... yeah well I'm pretty sure mine is the later update of the P bass.... with Metric screws and hex keys! wooo
[/quote]

Thhhhpppp! :P You're struggling now, aren't you?? :lol:

Posted

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1334880296' post='1623054']
Thhhhpppp! :P You're struggling now, aren't you?? :lol:
[/quote]
ahhh it's techincally possibly not even a fender though it says fender on the headstock. There you go!

Posted

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1334880539' post='1623056']
ahhh it's techincally possibly not even a fender though it says fender on the headstock. There you go!
[/quote]

What is a Fender, really? Answers on a postcard. In another thread, preferably. :santa:

Posted (edited)

To veer back on to topic (nice though the digression is),,,
I have put both covers on my CV 50s P bass and find they are helpful.
The pup cover is exactly where I need it when playing with fingers and the bridge cover is ideal to rest my hand when using a pick.
Having a smaller gap to pound with a pick forces me to play a bit tidier too (as belting my knuckles on the cover a few times serves as a good tutor)
OK, You can't palm mute but I might give the piece of foam under the cover trick a go.
Anyway isn't that why you have more than one bass. I can palm mute fine on my P or my Westone.

Edited by Leon Transaxle
Posted (edited)

I use the neck pickup cover on my Jazz Basses. The huge bridge cover is not to my preference - doesn't allow for palm muting (as was mentioned earlier), plus the available free string area between installed covers is minimal.

Here's a pic of my Custom Shop 1961 Jazz with the neck pickup cover in place:

[IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/kevin_lindsay/1026b656.jpg[/IMG]

Edited by kevin_lindsay

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...