Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Probably to generate a bit of interest - he's got a reserve on it.
It looks remarkably well-preserved for a 1969 bass... I wonder if it's been in his uncle's loft?

Posted

[quote name='Roland Rock' timestamp='1335654766' post='1634376']
[url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1969-Fender-Precision-Bass-/120904692743?pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item1c267b3407"]http://www.ebay.co.u...=item1c267b3407[/url]

What's the deal with this one? - 99p starting bid!
[/quote]
The deal is that it's not a 1969 Fender.

Posted

[quote name='Musky' timestamp='1335680031' post='1634448']
The deal is that it's not a 1969 Fender.
[/quote]
+1

Just because it has a serial number that dates to 69 engraved/stamped on a plate, you'd have to be wrong in the head to take that as proof! :unsure:

Posted (edited)

I think I have seen that before :blink: On here a while ago. The lettering on the headstock looks wrong, offset countour body on a P bass? <_<

Edited by Hobbayne
Posted

Wasn't the Fender logo the big black one in 1969? The section of the scratchplate where the controls/output jack are looks too 'fat' - Fender scratchplates are narrower in that area, often leaving a bit of the cavity exposed on copies.

Posted

This looks like an Encore to me, with a repro '69 neckplate, and appalling decal.

This is at £225 at the moment, already £125 more than its worth.

Tuners and string tree are real cheap, and look at that sunburst....fender sunburst...errr...No.

The pickguard is also the wrong shape (Apart from the wrong colour), its too wide around the control plate, and too rounded on the top section above the fret board. Soooo wrong.

Avoid.

Someones gonna get hurt.

Posted

In the description the word "According" would be enough to put me off even if it looked the part and had a starting price worthy of a 69P.

You would think owners of such instruments would know something about the history and so be a bit confident in the sales pitch.

Posted

[quote name='Horizontalste' timestamp='1335721350' post='1635010']
In the description the word "According" would be enough to put me off even if it looked the part and had a starting price worthy of a 69P.

You would think owners of such instruments would know something about the history and so be a bit confident in the sales pitch.
[/quote]
I think the inclusion of the word "according" lets this bloke off the hook if he has any comeback from Ebay over his pathetic attempt to palm this peice of s*** off as a 69 P. One is pretty certain this seller knows all about the history of this instrument.

Posted

[quote name='Rick's Fine '52' timestamp='1335700327' post='1634670']
........This is at £225 at the moment, already £125 more than its worth.

......[/quote]

It's broken the 400 mark now. 2 and a half hours to go.

Posted

[quote name='Hobbayne' timestamp='1335723911' post='1635070']
well, Ive reported it. May save some poor sod from being fleeced.
[/quote]

Good work. It's such a shame there are so many sharks out there.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...